Confused on Engine Variants

[carlh]

Hi,

avid reader, but still a newbie - so sorry for long winded questions. I'm looking to cash + PX in a V50 2.0D Powershift for an XC60. In my budget, it's looking like a 2009 model (say 30k on clock) - would love a D5, but may not be able to afford it.

SO, have been reading about all engine variants (including FWD and AWD) and looking to see what would be next best.

I must say I'm pretty confused, even after reading lots of posts. I'm trying to work out what variant matches each other and for what year to get some idea of what a good engine is. So far, I'm at this stage (am I completely confused!!)

2009
2.4D AWD (163hp) (2 x turbo)
2.4D FWD (175hp) (1 x turbo)

2009-2011
D3 FWD (163hp) (1 x turbo)
D5 AWD (163hp) (2 x turbo)
D5 AWD (185hp) (2 x turbo)
D5 AWD (205hp) (2 x turbo)

2011-2012
D4 FWD (163hp) - latest 2.0L (1 x turbo)
D4 AWD (163hp) - latest 2.4L (2 x turbo)
D5 AWD (215hp) - latest 2.4L (2 x turbo)

Ultimately, most of the cars I've seen that fall into my price range seem to be "2.4D SE 5DR GEARTRONIC". I presume these are the 175hp variant and are just FWD.

If this is correct, then is it going to feel comparable to my 2.0D V50 Powershift - I'm hoping this FWD XC60 handles well and is still quite pokey, if I can't get a D5.

The engine aspect that concerns me, is that an XC60 on a single turbo won't have the push for the safe overtaking in that 70-80mph range. I'm not a speed merchant, but do want the comfort of the push when you need it to get out of trouble.

Any advice, much appreciated - volvo have changed their nomenclature so much, it's baffling!! Thanks