Thread: Car rejected
View Single Post
Old Apr 1st, 2024, 19:20   #4
sk546
Master Member
 

Last Online: Today 08:24
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Norwich
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexman8 View Post
The next door neighbour of a friend of mine has rejected his XC40 on the basis that it was unsafe due to problems with AAOS. Whilst the rejection was initially refused by Volvo, the ombudsman has upheld the complaint and Volvo has accepted the ombudsman's decision.

The guy now has another (non-Volvo) car.
So was the problem with AAOS in general being dangerous (unlikely) or just that particular car and how AAOS operated on that car?

Each car integrates to the software differently which is why some people have very few issues encountered (like myself) while others seem to have issue after issue after issue.

I'm assuming the person had legitimate issues with their car (possibly a braking or safety system hardware/software integration issue) that caused safety concerns that the Ombudsman agreed with but you sound like you are trying to say ALL AAOS cars are dangerous because of one bad integration experience.

As Sandys says, without detail, your post has little merit.
__________________
MY22.5 XC60 Polestar Engineered (455) - Thunder Grey - AAOS
[360 Camera|Tow Bar|Ohlins|Akebono]

Previous - MY20 XC60 T8 Polestar Engineered - Onyx Black - Sensus
sk546 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sk546 For This Useful Post: