View Single Post
Old Oct 9th, 2019, 08:15   #22
morsing
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Apr 22nd, 2024 07:56
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Aylesbury
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LankyTim View Post
I had a 2.0 240 not long ago. Compared to modern cars they're cramped, under powered, thirsty and have poor handling.
O_o Really?

Cramped, no-way. Don't know what car you're comparing to, maybe compared to an XC90, but that's not really a fair comparison. Compared to a reasonably priced modern car, the 240 a far more spacious.

We have a 2014 V70 as well, and I'd give my 240 the edge over the V70 when it comes to space.

Under powered... Not a chance. Your 2.0, maybe, my 2.3, certainly not! And again, it's quicker than most modern reasonably priced cars.

And I get 30+ mpg, that's not thirsty. My wife's Subary Legacy 2.0 got 18mpg on a steady 60mpg run down the motorway. That's thirsty!

Poor handling, for what? I know I did upgrade my suspension 12 years ago, but I don't remember it being poor handling even before that. Even so, just spend a bit of money upgrading it. It's certainly comfortable to drive, but I don't know what your poor handling comment is trying to compare it to.
__________________
---
'89 Volvo 240GLT B230E/AW70
'14 Volvo V70 SE D4/M66 FWD
'70 Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu
'95 Saab 9000 CSE 2.0 Turbo Auto
morsing is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to morsing For This Useful Post: