Jun 16th, 2020, 14:11
|
#8
|
Bungling Amateur
Last Online: Today 16:37
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Beverley, East Yorks
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonefishblues
I think it's a slightly higher burden of proof IIRC, as above.
If car was good and the 'box went pop in 10 miles use, tough.
If seller was silent on known faults in advert, or didn't voluntarily disclose them (i.e. they weren't asked as part of the buying process) tough.
If seller knew faults, but misdescribed the car e.g. "no faults" in the advert, or when asked said, knowing the truth to be otherwise, the same thing, then there's a possibility.
|
Yep my feeling is you're spot on... hence the phrase "caveat emptor..."
__________________
2011 XC90 D5 Executive
2003 C70 T5 GT
2012 Ford Ranger XL SC
1977 Triumph Spitfire 1500
1976 Massey Ferguson 135
|
|
|