View Single Post
Old Sep 12th, 2019, 19:57   #26
Quacker
Premier Member
 
Quacker's Avatar
 

Last Online: Nov 22nd, 2021 00:53
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: West of Carmarthen
Default

The type of work an engine does has a big impact on miles per gallon. Nothing better illustrates this than my 2.2 litre Ford Ranger 6 speed automatic. This is a fairly thirsty engine by today's standards.

On long solo unladen journeys, which it seldom does, it is easily capable of 30mpg. However, my combination of short hard journeys and towing means that it averages between 17gallon tankfuls, how much do you think? 25? 20? No, it varies between 17 and 19mpg.

In isolation that sounds terrible, but it does have 150hp and 350Nm torque and an automatic. It also slightly betters the consumption I got for 22 years from a manual Land Rover 110 pickup with a 2.5 non-turbo engine developing all of 67hp doing the same work but m..u..c..h s..l..o..w..e..r. which would only do 25 at best solo unladen long distance.
__________________
XC90 D5, 2017 Inscription. Dark Grey. Xenium pack. Winter Plus with HUD. Black leather interior with alloy trim inserts. Ownership ended June 2020, Happy motoring times!
Quacker is offline   Reply With Quote