View Single Post
Old Jul 27th, 2018, 00:28   #11
andy_d
Premier Member
 
andy_d's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 17:55
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: birmingham
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkyMelon View Post


I never understood why Volvo released the 2.4i (no offence). It just seems completely pointless, slow, just as thirsty and expensive to run as the T5.....There's just no good logical reason for it IMO.
its an oddity ,,it Is volvo after all ,
not everyone wants a turbo for lots of reasons, turbo repair costs As well as the rest, and with an autobox your going to need autobox work on a turbo before a n/a engine,, add in insurance costs ,,etc etc,

2.4 V 2.5t ,, about the same mpg,, both get to 70 "fairly speedy" or "bloody speedy",, one comes with less repair bills / aggro with all the turbo pipework , etc


for me, i wanted
a volvo
auto box
petrol
estate shape If possible
anything else was "see whats there" S60 2.0Ts were looked at,
but the low seat height + parents in there 70s - nah
this V50 popped up @ a price that was Very reasonable / cheap,, and auto/petrol And estate,, And parents can get in/out of the front or rear without issue
other folk choose cars for different reasons
__________________
940s - 2l / 92 < gone&missed s401.8 xs auto <gone >V50 2.4SE Geartronic aka "the new money pit"
"skyship007 has now been successfully added to your ignore list. "."
andy_d is offline   Reply With Quote