Quote:
Originally Posted by Clifford Pope
That does make obvious sense, but I think it is missing the point. One old car may perhaps be unsafe, but the majority of cars over 40 years old are exceptionally well maintained, do small mileages, and are generally not used for peak-hours commuting.
Also there are very few of them, so whatever the risk posed by one individual car, in total the risk is miniscule.
Also, the actual testing procedure is increasingly diverging as between old cars and the latest modern ones. More and more of the tests involve electronic interogation of computer systems, and the number of old-style traditional mechanics capable of testing old vehicles is diminishing. Half the testable items do not apply to old vehicles.
I've owned vehicles in the past where I have had to show the tester how to operate them. One I had to drive the car myself and apply the brakes when instructed because the tester was too nervous. Also he was very small and the seat was not adjustable.
|
I understand your points of course - and read exactly the same in the consultation document the DoT engaged in after the EU directive deemed the UK's previous arrangements non-compliant.
What I'm seeing at the moment is a number of barn find cars and bikes being advertised as MoT exempt when they have not been re-commissioned and look (from the advertisements) to be nowhere near fit for the road.
Ho hum, not my problem, I'll keep enjoying driving the Royal Barge and riding my Bloop with no MoT test between them :-)
Alan