View Single Post
Old Dec 13th, 2017, 08:16   #13
domhart10
Volvo S40
 
domhart10's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 10:55
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Chichester
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Volvo2002 View Post
Definitely.

What I'd like to know is how reliable are these MK2s in comparison to the MK1? I used to have a 2002 S40 which was pretty solid! Reliability is important for me.

Love the floating console in these cars as well

I am on my second mk2 s40 here, prevoius one was a 2.0d and was a bag of problems and went it was fine I just loved the car. Love the car so much when I saw a T5 appear in the colour / condition / mileage an service / manual that I wanted, I snapped it up in a heart beat without even looking at the car and just put a deposit down.

With my current one it has to be the most reliable car I have had not requiring much work to look after, which I guess has allow me to mod him. very solid car and doing absolutely tonnes of driving with him.

I bought mine at 45k and its now 115k in 3 years and it is still going strong, just requiring a timing belt change but it does go for services regularly.

Just to add I have had a small list of things from the dealer on my car post, but even so these arent really a big deal at all at the moment.
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Current: 2009 Volvo S40 T5
Progress Thread: https://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=271945

Previous Volvo: 2008 S40 SE Lux R Design 2.0D
domhart10 is offline   Reply With Quote