|
200 Series General Forum for the Volvo 240 and 260 cars |
Information |
|
Ailing Nirvomats?Views : 656 Replies : 8Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
May 14th, 2018, 12:00 | #1 |
Not an expert but ...
Last Online: Today 09:55
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boncath
|
Ailing Nirvomats?
I'm pretty certain my car must have Nirvomats at the back, or something similar. The kind that have an external spring for part of their length?
I noticed today when fetching 5 heavy bags of compost that the back end seemed rather low. Even after driving for a bit it had only pumped itself up a bit, and still looked sagged. I'm sure in the past it would indeed self-level virtually to normal ride height. When I unloaded the bags and rocked the suspension a bit the level rose by about 1 1/2 ". Presumably this indicates the shock absorbers are ailing? They still pass the bounce test, and the recent MOT, but don't seem to self-level any more. Also they have developed a squeak when standing still. I'm aware that Nirvomats go with special softer springs, so can't just be changed for ordinary shock absorbers, but are they really worthwhile? I've several spare ordinary springs so wondered about using those and just getting standard (much cheaper?) shocks? |
May 14th, 2018, 12:15 | #2 |
Monster Raving Loony
Last Online: Nov 12th, 2018 20:03
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: hitchin
|
As far as I can tell, when nivomats fail its ££££, unless you can find a used pair at sensible dosh you are far better off with standard shocks.
Of course, if you do heavy towing or use the car as a builders van then the nivos are the better choice. Break open the piggy bank.
__________________
1994 850 2.0 bought at 32,000 miles used daily now 45,000. Still like a nearly-new car 2004 filthy polluting diesel VW |
May 14th, 2018, 13:16 | #3 |
Trader Volvo in my veins
Last Online: Today 21:48
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Anglesey
|
It sounds like you have extra load shocks like these https://www.classicswede.co.uk/200_s..._18244872.aspx
rather than Nivo's. They don't self level, they just take more to compress |
May 14th, 2018, 16:00 | #4 |
No I'm not the redhead
Last Online: Nov 25th, 2022 09:49
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Yorkshire Coast
|
If you remove them and go for normal springs and shocks, you'll also probably not have a rear anti roll bar fitted.
I have a rear ARB with brackets in my stash of stuff if you need one. |
May 14th, 2018, 19:03 | #5 |
Not an expert but ...
Last Online: Today 09:55
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boncath
|
Until very recently the car could take a heavy load without sagging, or rather it did but pumped itself up the moment it got under way. Now it only levels with ordinary loads. So I presume that means it must have Nirvomats, or something that serves the same function. Does that mean I can assume the springs are the softer kind, so will need changing if I swap to ordinary shocks? How could I tell - do they look different?
It's got an ARB, thanks Antz, I fitted it a few years ago. |
May 14th, 2018, 19:28 | #6 |
Trader Volvo in my veins
Last Online: Today 21:48
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Anglesey
|
Nivo's have large body and are upside down with the body at the top and piston at the bottom.
The extra load shocks have the coil spring around them as per link. If there was no rear ARB that does suggest Nivo's in which case you need to replace springs and shocks |
May 15th, 2018, 08:29 | #7 |
Not an expert but ...
Last Online: Today 09:55
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boncath
|
OK, got it now, I've had a closer look. They are the ordinary thickness but are upside down. What I'd remembered as a small spring is actually convoluted rubber disintegrated into separate rings.
So they do seem to be self-levelling type of some kind, so presumably do have the softer springs. If they are not then either way it needs new springs, because they sag under heavy load either from weakened springs or from failed "Nivos" which deliberately use weaker springs. I don't commonly carry heavy loads so don't think need the extra-load shocks, I'll just get standard and fit my spare springs which I know to be good. Many thanks. |
May 26th, 2018, 08:15 | #8 |
Not an expert but ...
Last Online: Today 09:55
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boncath
|
Checking on my stock of springs removed from previously dismantled vehicles, I find a choice of 3 different pairs:
42 cm long, 8 free coil turns, blue splash of paint, 12.5 mm wire 43 cm long, 8 free turns, no markings, 13.0 mm wire 43 cm long, 8 free turns, no markings, 14.0 mm wire. All have come off estate versions, but I can't remember which. Am I correct that the first are saloon, used in a light-load estate, second are normal estate, and the third are heavy-duty estate? Which should I fit? I don't normally carry heavy loads, only occasionaly. Would the thicker ones be too hard for normal use? |
Jun 8th, 2018, 17:22 | #9 |
Not an expert but ...
Last Online: Today 09:55
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boncath
|
I've fitted the medium-wire pair, with standard shocks. The ride height unloaded is an inch higher, and they don't sag if I sit on the boot lip.
It's interesting that the old springs have both thinner wire and only 7 free turns of coil instead of 8. Uncompressed they are the same length as the new. So it's obvious how much depends on the shock absorbers themselves providing suspension lift. Mine had none at all - the plunger just pulls in and out easily and does nothing. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|