|
700/900 Series General Forum for the Volvo 740, 760, 780, 940, 960 & S/V90 cars |
Information |
|
960 180/204 bhpViews : 3194 Replies : 34Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Mar 9th, 2011, 21:54 | #1 |
Pure is Beautiful
Last Online: Apr 13th, 2021 19:44
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/
|
960 180/204 bhp
Never thought about this before, but as I was thinking about buying a spare engine for mods, it came up>
What is the physical difference between the two versions of the S90 motor? As far as I am aware, they share the same capacity, compression ratio, and Motronic 1.8 fuelling. So is it an ecu thing that reduces the power on one of them? Cheers, T
__________________
I Think. I Think I Am; Therefore I Am - I Think . . . . |
Mar 9th, 2011, 21:58 | #2 |
Experienced Member
Last Online: Today 08:45
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
|
They are all 204 bhp in UK probably some federal emission equipment and different software dropping the power . Our UK V70 2.4 petrol has two power outputs from the same engine 140 bhp or 175 bhp with just software altering the torque characteristics ... surprisingly the 140 is ideal for towing ..
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience . |
Mar 9th, 2011, 22:08 | #3 | |
Pure is Beautiful
Last Online: Apr 13th, 2021 19:44
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/
|
Quote:
I understood they introduced the 180 when they dropped the 2.5 as the S90 came in for the UK, and offered the manual trans with the lower output engine. It's mentioned here: www.volvoclub.org.uk/s90v90.shtml Sounds like an ecu mod to me. What do you think? Cheers, T p.s. What is a 3 litre white block engine worth? Given whole cars with MOT are going for peanuts, I said about £200/250 for a decent one, is that fair?
__________________
I Think. I Think I Am; Therefore I Am - I Think . . . . Last edited by T240; Mar 9th, 2011 at 22:12. |
|
Mar 9th, 2011, 22:32 | #4 |
Experienced Member
Last Online: Today 08:45
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
|
I have never come across the B6304B 180 bhp has anyone else ?
there is also a B6304B with 184 bhp and a B6244F with 163 bhp UK usualy only takes the most powerful versions . i expect our dismantlers here would want a healthy profit on one of these engines , £500?? they now are fully aware of the value of them .. unlike the days when i went into a scrap yard and came to the desk with a pair of weber 40 DCOE carburettors in my hands , he said " Two carbs mate thats £5 each" :-)
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience . |
Mar 10th, 2011, 11:48 | #5 |
Aye - him again
Last Online: Today 16:23
Join Date: May 2001
Location: HAWICK
|
I have always believed that the power difference was that the higher output (204) was from the '3 litre' unit and the lower output (180) was from the '2.5 litre' unit. I have not come across a '3 litre' unit outputting 180.
__________________
(Ouch - that's another knuckle ...) VOC 11817 |
Mar 10th, 2011, 12:24 | #6 |
VOC Member
Last Online: May 28th, 2024 16:30
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Köln, Germany
|
I have driven the 2.5 180bhp version in Sweden back in the early 90's with a manual transmission.
Nice engine, especially as it was a 6-cyl one! The manual gearbox did not suit the car however. Brisk too. Not much to say as it was a looong time ago, but I do remember that the engine was near silent, just like the 3.0 litre version.
__________________
2019 XC60 T6 R-Design 2017 S6 Avant 1996 850R 1987 780 Bertone Lots of previous Volvo's |
Mar 10th, 2011, 12:29 | #7 |
VOC Member
Last Online: May 1st, 2013 15:10
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dewsbury
|
Dont think there is any difference power wise in the S90 whether they are manual or auto. I think they are the same engine as the 960, maybe just different ECU for better emission/economy. Doubt they did anything to the engine itself to dock the power
Bas |
Mar 10th, 2011, 13:28 | #8 |
Brit in Germany
Last Online: Yesterday 17:54
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Bremen
|
The difference consists of different camshafts (different lifter profile) and a different engine management system.
It produces (iirc) more torque than the 204 hp 3.0 at a different rev-area. As the 204 hp engine has a too higher end power output, the M90 gearbox (fitted to the 2.5l with 170 hp and the 3.0l with 180 hp) couldn't cope with the power... Reduce hp, add a bit of torque and it works...
__________________
The Best Nation Is Imagination 2010 V70 (Type 135) D5 (D5244T10) Automatic (TF-80SC) |
The Following User Says Thank You to Daim For This Useful Post: |
Mar 10th, 2011, 13:50 | #9 |
Junior Member
Last Online: Mar 20th, 2011 10:30
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cheshire
|
|
Mar 10th, 2011, 19:22 | #10 |
N.F.I
|
The 180 bhp 3.0 engine was first unveiled in 1993 for the US market in response to a lack of low down torque from the 204bhp version. The Uk still only had the higher power version available up until 1995MY when a 2.5 version was launched with 170bhp. The 3.0 204's were only ever available with auto gearboxes, whereas the 2.5's could be had with the M90 manual 'box. For the Uk market Volvo decided to drop the 2.5 litre engine for the change from the 960 to the S/V90 and offer the 'US spec' 180bhp version of the 3.0 instead, also available with auto or manual gearboxes.
The only difference between a 180 and a 204 are the camshafts. There are ECU differences between auto and manual cars (the engine limits torque momentarily during a gearshift to make a smoother change with an auto), but that's it. An auto 180 has the same ECU as a 204 (204's all being auto as mentioned above). |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|