Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > S80 '06-'16 / V70 & XC70 '07-'16 General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

S80 '06-'16 / V70 & XC70 '07-'16 General Forum for the P3-platform S80 and 70-series models

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

XC70 always in four wheel drive?

Views : 1285

Replies : 11

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Feb 6th, 2016, 21:45   #11
Tannaton
Bungling Amateur
 
Tannaton's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 07:31
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Beverley, East Yorks
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrantA View Post
Phase 3 or Gen 3 XC70s have a Haldex drive system for AWD and, as 4candles has said the "split" is normally 90/10 until the car starts to lose grip then the Phase 3 cars respond much quicker than previous versions of the system.

Apparently the Haldex coupling on the earlier models of the XC70 were a nightmare and the drive from the gearbox to the rear coupling were forever shearing. At one stage XC drivers were advised to keep the tyre wear between axles at no more than 2mm as excessive tyre wear between front and back tyres put excessive strain on the drive from the gearbox. The problem centred around the number of splines on the gearbox output shaft and it was only when the Phase 3 cars were fitted with much improved splines that the problem went away. I understand that unless the "broken drive" became noisy it was difficult to tell when the splines had failed with the only immediate indication being an improved MPG as the car was only 2 wheel drive.

The Haldex system has been in use for a number of years on Audis and this link explains basically how the system works, if you are bored read through it although it is a bit technical..... http://www.vaglinks.com/Docs/Audi/TT...StudyGuide.pdf pages 34 and 35 explain how the power is distributed between front and back wheels depending on the conditions.
The issue you refer to with the splines failing was the splined sleeve between the gearbox and transfer box on cars with the AW55 5-speed auto gearbox - i.e. 163 BHP D5 and pre 2005 petrol models. The later cars with the 6-speed TF80SC gearbox are much less likely to have this problem. It's a £100 part but quite a bit of labour to sort, it's easy to check you turn the propshaft with at least both front wheels on the ground - if you can keep turning it then you have failed AWD.

If the AWD fails because of the splined sleeve - there is no outward indication until you get stuck, so if you have a AWD with the AW55 you should check it. There is no difference in MPG, the propshaft, rear differential and driveshafts are still rotated by engine power whether through the gearbox or by the rear wheels. You used to see a lot of Freelanders for sale with "propshaft removed for economy reasons" but it makes no measurable difference.
__________________
2011 XC90 D5 Executive
2003 C70 T5 GT
2012 Ford Ranger XL SC
1977 Triumph Spitfire 1500
1976 Massey Ferguson 135

Last edited by Tannaton; Feb 6th, 2016 at 21:49.
Tannaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 6th, 2016, 22:38   #12
Simon Jones
Premier Member
 

Last Online: May 29th, 2024 06:32
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Salisbury (ish)
Default

Bear in mind that any 4WD system adds additional weight (transfer box, prop shaft, rear diff, driveshafts etc) so there will be a negative impact on fuel consumption regardless of whether the wheels are being driven or not. The extra drag of the diff etc rotating (again even if no power is being provided to the rear wheels) will also reduce fuel economy.
Simon Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Simon Jones For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.