|
Information |
|
S60 Diesel 163 AutoViews : 1641 Replies : 19Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Jun 20th, 2016, 20:54 | #11 |
Junior Member
|
Had it on eBay a couple of weeks ago and it only hit 1300 quid.. Just ridiculous. I'd consider it a good and worthy alternative to a similar aged merc or audi etc. I guess volvo of this era don't hold the same residual values as those German marque's though.
If it doesn't sell for a sensible price I'd rather part ex or give it away to a family member. |
Jun 20th, 2016, 20:58 | #12 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 07:49
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Near Bicester, Oxon
|
Quote:
|
|
Jun 20th, 2016, 22:07 | #13 |
Monster Raving Loony
Last Online: Nov 12th, 2018 20:03
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: hitchin
|
If its a decent car, low hassle, low bills, and worth very little, why sell at all ? Just keep it, wont be worth much less in a year or two
__________________
1994 850 2.0 bought at 32,000 miles used daily now 45,000. Still like a nearly-new car 2004 filthy polluting diesel VW |
Jun 20th, 2016, 23:02 | #14 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Dec 26th, 2021 13:42
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Crewe
|
Quote:
I paid £1600 for mine 4 years ago when it was 10 years old so you wanting £1900 for an 11 year old car is probably a little optimistic. We know that if looked after, they're great cars that will run forever but buyers don't always see that. £1300 is probably harsh though.
__________________
2002 S60 SE D5 Manual 209000 miles |
|
Jul 2nd, 2016, 15:10 | #15 |
VOC Member
Last Online: May 31st, 2024 12:46
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South Lakes
|
SOLD! To me, today
Happy with the car, drives very nicely, and won't take much to get it very nice indeed! Driving it back up to Cumbria tomorrow so will get a good chance to settle into my new comfy seat. What's more it does seem to be averaging 50-60mpg quite happily! It got 59.8 on the 50 or so mile run back into East London this morning, without really trying, and with the climate control on. Thanks, Mark!
__________________
2008 XC70 SE Lux D5 - 1966 Amazon - 1979 C202 Laplander Past: 1997 S70 TDi, 1997 C70 T5 GT, 2003 V70 Bi-Fuel, 2000 Ph2 V70 2.5D, 1997 V70R Auto FWD, 1998 V70R Manual AWD, 2004 XC90 D5 G/T, 2005 S60 D5 |
Jul 2nd, 2016, 16:06 | #16 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 07:49
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Near Bicester, Oxon
|
Measured or indicated mpg? The two are sometimes very different on this gen (as in mine shows in excess of 60 mpg which translates to just over 50 measured)
|
Jul 2nd, 2016, 16:09 | #17 |
VOC Member
Last Online: May 31st, 2024 12:46
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South Lakes
|
I'll know once I've had a full tank through it, how well it matches up.
Having a nice big number on the dash gives a warm fuzzy feeling anyway, even without the heated seat on!
__________________
2008 XC70 SE Lux D5 - 1966 Amazon - 1979 C202 Laplander Past: 1997 S70 TDi, 1997 C70 T5 GT, 2003 V70 Bi-Fuel, 2000 Ph2 V70 2.5D, 1997 V70R Auto FWD, 1998 V70R Manual AWD, 2004 XC90 D5 G/T, 2005 S60 D5 |
Jul 2nd, 2016, 16:14 | #18 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 07:49
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Near Bicester, Oxon
|
|
Jul 3rd, 2016, 08:55 | #19 |
Senior Member
Last Online: May 20th, 2024 07:34
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Birmingham
|
My 02 S60 manual tells lies.
My 55 V70 Auto is much more accurate - still a little high but 3 mpg not 10! |
Jul 8th, 2016, 09:33 | #20 |
VOC Member
Last Online: May 31st, 2024 12:46
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South Lakes
|
As you guys reckoned it's quite a liar!
At the end of my first full tank the car claimed 50.50mpg average. Hand calcs told me it was nearer 39.5... Had a couple of mountain bikes on the roof for a bit of that, but it's a bit disappointing that the D5 can't really match the old tdi for economy.
__________________
2008 XC70 SE Lux D5 - 1966 Amazon - 1979 C202 Laplander Past: 1997 S70 TDi, 1997 C70 T5 GT, 2003 V70 Bi-Fuel, 2000 Ph2 V70 2.5D, 1997 V70R Auto FWD, 1998 V70R Manual AWD, 2004 XC90 D5 G/T, 2005 S60 D5 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|