Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > 700/900 Series General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

700/900 Series General Forum for the Volvo 740, 760, 780, 940, 960 & S/V90 cars

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Experiences with rear Bilstein HD shocks

Views : 8007

Replies : 39

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Apr 12th, 2013, 13:40   #11
Pete940
Ideal Volvo
 
Pete940's Avatar
 

Last Online: Jun 11th, 2024 23:35
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Haydock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ton246 View Post
Is that for a set of 4 or just the rears ? Price ?
that was just the rears. I was quoted £55 per rear excluding vat and carriage, £80 for front.
Pete940 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12th, 2013, 13:58   #12
ian2000t
Premier Member
 
ian2000t's Avatar
 

Last Online: Oct 21st, 2023 20:25
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Halesowen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete940 View Post
that was just the rears. I was quoted £55 per rear excluding vat and carriage, £80 for front.
That's bloody good compared to the £140/160 per shock for Koni adjustables!!
__________________

1990 Volvo 760 GLE D24TIC ZF22 - 16psi, more fuel, Monark 293 nozzles, 40mm lower, Bilstein TCs, 24/19 ARBs, full Polybushed front, H&R spacers, 17" Titans. Running Veg oil/petrol mix.
Past: 1988 Volvo 740 B230E M46, 1991 Volvo 940 B230FB M47
ian2000t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 3rd, 2014, 14:04   #13
ian2000t
Premier Member
 
ian2000t's Avatar
 

Last Online: Oct 21st, 2023 20:25
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Halesowen
Default

Sorry to drag this up again - but did you get anywhere with the Gaz adjustable shocks? I may be interested in an upgrade as I'm not sure the Bilstein TC's are up to the job!
__________________

1990 Volvo 760 GLE D24TIC ZF22 - 16psi, more fuel, Monark 293 nozzles, 40mm lower, Bilstein TCs, 24/19 ARBs, full Polybushed front, H&R spacers, 17" Titans. Running Veg oil/petrol mix.
Past: 1988 Volvo 740 B230E M46, 1991 Volvo 940 B230FB M47
ian2000t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 3rd, 2014, 15:57   #14
Pete940
Ideal Volvo
 
Pete940's Avatar
 

Last Online: Jun 11th, 2024 23:35
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Haydock
Default

Been running the gaz shocks for almost a year now. The adjustability is great, they go all the way from super soft to rock solid (ideal for any drifters out there). The ride is not comfortable though, something about the way they are setup doesn't seem ideal. They just feel rather bouncy on mine.
The adjustability can be useful, especially if the car sees track use, but personally I want to try something else next time.
Low cost, comfort, adjustability. I guess you can only have two of those three things.
Pete940 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5th, 2014, 14:46   #15
ian2000t
Premier Member
 
ian2000t's Avatar
 

Last Online: Oct 21st, 2023 20:25
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Halesowen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete940 View Post
Been running the gaz shocks for almost a year now. The adjustability is great, they go all the way from super soft to rock solid (ideal for any drifters out there). The ride is not comfortable though, something about the way they are setup doesn't seem ideal. They just feel rather bouncy on mine.
The adjustability can be useful, especially if the car sees track use, but personally I want to try something else next time.
Low cost, comfort, adjustability. I guess you can only have two of those three things.
Are you running them front and rear? What springs do you have? And what condition are all of your bushes in?

When you say bouncy do you mean they are stiff and bumpy, or that they "overreact" to bumps as if they aren't damping quite enough?

I have them on my mini and they damp very well but I have to have them set high as my springs are too stiff. If I wind them down more they just overreact to every bump, allowing the springs to almost launch the car - kind of like the front of the Volvo feels at the moment.

I'm sure I've heard people say Bilstein HD are too stiff, and my TC's seem too soft so maybe the super expensive Konis are the way to go?
__________________

1990 Volvo 760 GLE D24TIC ZF22 - 16psi, more fuel, Monark 293 nozzles, 40mm lower, Bilstein TCs, 24/19 ARBs, full Polybushed front, H&R spacers, 17" Titans. Running Veg oil/petrol mix.
Past: 1988 Volvo 740 B230E M46, 1991 Volvo 940 B230FB M47
ian2000t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5th, 2014, 16:43   #16
Pete940
Ideal Volvo
 
Pete940's Avatar
 

Last Online: Jun 11th, 2024 23:35
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Haydock
Default

Just rear. HD's on the front, which are indeed pretty stiff but not unpleasant. Using Lesjofors springs, and my bushes are mostly ancient to be honest.

Yes they don't seem to damp enough over small sharp bumps at lower speeds. However, they do move a fair bit over larger progressive bumps. If I soften them up to reduce the bounciness then they compress too much over the large progressive type bumps, therefore the compromise is not ideal.

Shame we can't get a second opinion on them, although someone else in the country did get Gaz shocks for a 7 series (according to Gaz).
Pete940 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5th, 2014, 17:24   #17
ian2000t
Premier Member
 
ian2000t's Avatar
 

Last Online: Oct 21st, 2023 20:25
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Halesowen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete940 View Post
Just rear. HD's on the front, which are indeed pretty stiff but not unpleasant. Using Lesjofors springs, and my bushes are mostly ancient to be honest.

Yes they don't seem to damp enough over small sharp bumps at lower speeds. However, they do move a fair bit over larger progressive bumps. If I soften them up to reduce the bounciness then they compress too much over the large progressive type bumps, therefore the compromise is not ideal.

Shame we can't get a second opinion on them, although someone else in the country did get Gaz shocks for a 7 series (according to Gaz).
Oh OK, I think I could so with a set of Gaz adjustable for the front of mine, as that's where the TC's feel like they are under damping! The TC's on the rear are strange, they feel too harsh sometimes but then too soft others depending on the road surface.

I think the rear is hard to get right on these. Mine still rolls too much at the rear. If I add a second AR bar or stiffer shocks then the handling will be more responsive but the rear will lose grip easier (can be trail happy already!). I think there is too much unsprung weight at the back with the kart axle, especially with the weight distribution towards the front (especially diesel). In planning to poly bush everything as my axle bushes are awful and then see where that leaves me. I have a theory that the bouncy handling is actually not the shocks but too much movement in all of the bushes (before the shock moves).

We'll see! Won't be for a while though as the Mini is having a rebuild+turbo this year and the Volvo is getting converted to M90 manual.
__________________

1990 Volvo 760 GLE D24TIC ZF22 - 16psi, more fuel, Monark 293 nozzles, 40mm lower, Bilstein TCs, 24/19 ARBs, full Polybushed front, H&R spacers, 17" Titans. Running Veg oil/petrol mix.
Past: 1988 Volvo 740 B230E M46, 1991 Volvo 940 B230FB M47
ian2000t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5th, 2014, 18:08   #18
davebslater(uk)
redbollock guru
 
davebslater(uk)'s Avatar
 

Last Online: Jun 30th, 2016 23:54
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: lincoln
Default

Problem with gaz is the damper rod size. Billy hd's are thick rod .

You can re valve any damper altho that can be expensive.
__________________
www.dbsmotorsport.co.uk
davebslater(uk) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 5th, 2014, 18:25   #19
Pete940
Ideal Volvo
 
Pete940's Avatar
 

Last Online: Jun 11th, 2024 23:35
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Haydock
Default

I can't think what bushes at the rear could play a part in the bounciness? I hope you're right though because then there's a cure.
Pete940 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7th, 2014, 17:30   #20
Chesh740R
Turbobricker
 
Chesh740R's Avatar
 

Last Online: May 10th, 2024 21:36
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wellingborough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete940 View Post

Shame we can't get a second opinion on them, although someone else in the country did get Gaz shocks for a 7 series (according to Gaz).
That's me, but I must admit they have sat on the shelf for couple of years now as I haven't had the time to get them on. Plus I'm also awaiting for a few other suspension components to be made so I can fit my front gaz coil overs I had made.
Chesh740R is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bilstein, gaz, heavy duty


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:34.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.