|
PV, 120 (Amazon), 1800 General Forum for the Volvo PV, 120 and 1800 cars |
Information |
|
Sobering test P1800E vs modern Citroen BerlingoViews : 3398 Replies : 35Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Jul 18th, 2012, 10:00 | #21 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Oct 23rd, 2023 21:39
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: EXETER
|
There is no getting away from the fact that advances in technology provide evolotion and improvements. In comparison my modern thing does everything better than my oldies apart from putting a smile on my face. Oh, and depreciation
I was thinking of swapping my V70 for a more charming 240 GLT, but then I watched the crash tests on Youtube...... Enough said. That and the fact the thing stops on muddy Devon lanes much better than an oldy I know you could get run over by a bus and all that, but it's things like this that make me think hard and fast about using an old car as an everyday
__________________
2006 XC70 D5 Manual 1968 Amazon Estate, B18A + Overdrive 2019 V60 D3 Momentum Pro Manual 1970 Amazon 2-Door 1970 142DL |
Jul 18th, 2012, 20:22 | #22 |
Trader Volvo in my veins
Last Online: Today 00:27
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Anglesey
|
I suppose a 240 is probably a bit safer than a V70 but at least the V70 would be pretty close. I would not want to be in any modern small car in a crash. They might keep their shape well but that is what will cause you the damage!
|
Jul 22nd, 2012, 19:08 | #23 | |
Trader
Last Online: Aug 1st, 2014 05:07
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Madill
|
Quote:
__________________
Robert Jackson Classic Auto Glass Innovations Flush Mount Glass Classicautoglassinnovations.com |
|
Jul 22nd, 2012, 20:43 | #24 | |
Experienced Member
Last Online: Yesterday 23:26
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
|
Quote:
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience . |
|
Jul 22nd, 2012, 21:54 | #25 |
VOC Member
Last Online: Yesterday 14:25
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chatham
|
We know where you're coming from Robert and it looks as if you're producing some nice kit. Unfortunately, on this side of the pond there are few who have the readies to spend on these "updates". Until then, a line in Adam's post that you replied to will have to suffice.
"In comparison, my modern thing does everything better than my oldies apart from putting a smile on my face." Having a smile on my face and not spending $25k on mods, Priceless! |
The Following User Says Thank You to Derek UK For This Useful Post: |
Jul 23rd, 2012, 12:54 | #26 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Oct 23rd, 2023 21:39
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: EXETER
|
There's nothing on Youtube showing 240 crash testing so I'm not pointing at anything specifically concerning about a 240 - I know that compared to others from that era, a 240 is particularly good. I was referring to the fact that the V70 appears to perform extremely well in the crash tests compared to other cars and for that reason I decided to keep the boring thing
If I did change it to a more attractive 240, it would pick at me the whole time my wife and family were out in a car that didn't have as good brakes as my existing Volvo. As well as all the other advances in safety technology in the design of a car launched in 2000 rather than a car launched on 1974. When I'm talking about safety technology, I'm talking about the features that reduce injuries in a crash instead of safety in avoiding a crash Two things: Did you see Fifth Gear when they smashed a '93 Volvo 940 (complete with ALL the safety features of any massive Volvo) into a 2008 Renault Modus? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBDyeWofcLY Secondly, have you EVER seen the aftermath of a smash involving a crappety old car That's why I'm keeping my boring modern thing instead of changing it for something older
__________________
2006 XC70 D5 Manual 1968 Amazon Estate, B18A + Overdrive 2019 V60 D3 Momentum Pro Manual 1970 Amazon 2-Door 1970 142DL |
Jul 23rd, 2012, 13:20 | #27 | |
Experienced Member
Last Online: Yesterday 23:26
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
|
Quote:
Anyway the 240 wasnt just particularly good in 1974 , it was the world leader, and the americans thought as much as to base their safety regulations on it . you can drive a 240 into a brick wall at 50 mph and open the doors and step out . if a little dizzy . there is 3 feet of compression at the front which reduces the G force of the crash a huge amount . The door panels and beams do their job by being thick steel rather than the lighter but extra strength steel of current volvos . The frontal structure is done on modern volvos in a different way now with 3 grades of steel and six instead of two longitudinal beams which progressivly collapse , the front beams are boron steel which is too hard to drill . However you are nearer the point of impact in a newer volvo so g forces may be greater . This is exagerated in the SMART car which is very strong but there is nothing at the front to crush and reduce the G force so you get bad injuries from the seat belts . Dont be put off from getting a 240 .. PS there ARE 240 crash tests on You tube ...
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience . |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Clan For This Useful Post: |
Jul 23rd, 2012, 16:25 | #28 |
Master Member
Last Online: Mar 10th, 2023 13:03
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sheffield
|
I know you're right in principle, Adam, but surely if we followed that thinking through we'd never go out in our old cars at all, and certainly wouldn't take family or friends out in them. I definitely don't want to have a car crash in any vehicle, but I don't think I've ever chosen a car on the basis of my likelihood of surviving a crash in it. I don't have the financial luxury of owning more than one car, but it's the road trip adventures with the car laden down with wife and daughter, baggage (and bottles of booze on some occasions) that are the ones where having a classic becomes really fun. So I think we've already made our choice about how much of a priority safety is compared to fun.
__________________
1967 Volvo 121 Auto in everyday use and rolling restoration. 2002 Audi TT quattro. (Sorry!) |
Jul 23rd, 2012, 19:16 | #29 | |
Junior Member
Last Online: Jun 1st, 2016 14:42
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dublin
|
Quote:
|
|
Jul 23rd, 2012, 19:22 | #30 | |
Junior Member
Last Online: Jun 1st, 2016 14:42
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dublin
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|