Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > 700/900 Series General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

700/900 Series General Forum for the Volvo 740, 760, 780, 940, 960 & S/V90 cars

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

200FT Hard cold start. Pulls like a train when warm.

Views : 4287

Replies : 67

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jul 7th, 2018, 19:56   #51
Stephen Edwin
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Oct 26th, 2023 20:42
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Thurrock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laird Scooby View Post
Fuel is meant to be rich at start up on a cold engine though!
BUT. Of those three scenarios that do or should result in rich fuel, one of them does not start this car! That is when that particular CTS is fitted and connected. So. What happens if a known good CTS is fitted and connected?

Worth eliminating that point init?

Am I really missing something here ???
Stephen Edwin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Stephen Edwin For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 7th, 2018, 20:17   #52
Laird Scooby
Premier Member
 
Laird Scooby's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 00:00
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lakenheath
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Edwin View Post
BUT. Of those three scenarios that do or should result in rich fuel, one of them does not start this car! That is when that particular CTS is fitted and connected. So. What happens if a known good CTS is fitted and connected?

Worth eliminating that point init?

Am I really missing something here ???
I'm sure he has changed the CTS, can't remember where i saw it in the list of things done but i'm sure it's there somewhere.

Yes, you're right, nothing should be overlooked, like i said a long time ago in ths thread, this will either be something incredibly simple or complex, not sure which yet!
As such nothing should be overlooked!
__________________
Cheers
Dave

Next Door to Top-Gun with a Honda CR-V & S Type Jag Volvo gone but not forgotten........
Laird Scooby is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Laird Scooby For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 7th, 2018, 20:19   #53
AndyV7o
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Jun 21st, 2021 20:47
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Creswell
Default

You're seemingly having the same thoughts as me Stephen!
Disconnecting it resulted in car starting, so lets acknowledge that and look at other things...
Everything is all valid and very good stuff, but Ive personally always focussed primarily on something as cut'n'dry as that and its associated paraphernalia before moving on (and so would the others at the garage where I did a stint many moons ago). It coukd be a red-herring, but its best to establish that first.
Not that I'm criticising anyone, as I said its all good, valid stuff and Im reading this thread with interest. Ive got basically no experience of volvos until about 6 weeks ago! When at the garage we had a couple in for service, but nothing faulty...
Fords on the other hand, escorts in particular, were plentiful, broken fuse box pcb's, burnt out valves, ignition modules and coils, blocked breathers, I could go on...
AndyV7o is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AndyV7o For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 7th, 2018, 20:28   #54
Laird Scooby
Premier Member
 
Laird Scooby's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 00:00
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lakenheath
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyV7o View Post
You're seemingly having the same thoughts as me Stephen!
Disconnecting it resulted in car starting, so lets acknowledge that and look at other things...
Everything is all valid and very good stuff, but Ive personally always focussed primarily on something as cut'n'dry as that and its associated paraphernalia before moving on (and so would the others at the garage where I did a stint many moons ago). It coukd be a red-herring, but its best to establish that first.
Not that I'm criticising anyone, as I said its all good, valid stuff and Im reading this thread with interest. Ive got basically no experience of volvos until about 6 weeks ago! When at the garage we had a couple in for service, but nothing faulty...
Fords on the other hand, escorts in particular, were plentiful, broken fuse box pcb's, burnt out valves, ignition modules and coils, blocked breathers, I could go on...
I've repaired many Escort/Onion fuseboxes and later replaced them when the cost came down. It seemed like the Escrot was a particularly unreliable car, in fact it wasn't - there were just huge numbers of them on the road!
French cars on the other hand, same and worse faults but not as many of them yet more were faulty.............
__________________
Cheers
Dave

Next Door to Top-Gun with a Honda CR-V & S Type Jag Volvo gone but not forgotten........
Laird Scooby is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Laird Scooby For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 7th, 2018, 20:36   #55
AndyV7o
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Jun 21st, 2021 20:47
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Creswell
Default

The cvh and early zetec were sh1tters though! If looked after like a new born lamb theyd be ok but rather intolerant of any minor abuse, ie the majority of owners
There was a guy with a smokey xr3i, he was told it was dying due to low compression, crappy breathers and the rest, his answer was to keep adding more 'tuning' items It had cone filter with a cold-air ram feed from the bottom of the front valance (so it could suck stuff & water up) and all sorts...
AndyV7o is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AndyV7o For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 7th, 2018, 21:53   #56
Laird Scooby
Premier Member
 
Laird Scooby's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 00:00
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lakenheath
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyV7o View Post
The cvh and early zetec were sh1tters though! If looked after like a new born lamb theyd be ok but rather intolerant of any minor abuse, ie the majority of owners
There was a guy with a smokey xr3i, he was told it was dying due to low compression, crappy breathers and the rest, his answer was to keep adding more 'tuning' items It had cone filter with a cold-air ram feed from the bottom of the front valance (so it could suck stuff & water up) and all sorts...
Early Zetec was a bit after my time in an ex-Ford dealers where i saw a 17k mile Escort 1.3CVH that had an absolutely shot engine - worn out, blew more smoke rings out of the exhaust than enough!
Never driven hard, owned by an old guy who bought it new in 83 on a "Y" when he retired, used once a week to go to the Post Office for his'n'hers pensions, a bit of shopping (....and £3 of telephone stamps, a TV Licence stamp etc) in the Post Office for freshly baked bread then another 3 miles onto the nearest town and supermarket.
An hour or so later, the 3 miles home again.
Why was it shot? The choke was never pushed in!

As for putting a CAI in the front valance, the hottest air above a road is in fact about 6" from the surface..............

I do remember seeing the official Ford memo saying the CVH was ONLY to be fitted with Bosch plugs (never Motorcraft) as all others would misfire in it!

The dealership (ex-Ford) was a Suzuki and Seat (when Seat were still independent of VAG and only just launched here) so i got to drive (and fix!) a wide variety of vehicles!
__________________
Cheers
Dave

Next Door to Top-Gun with a Honda CR-V & S Type Jag Volvo gone but not forgotten........
Laird Scooby is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Laird Scooby For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 7th, 2018, 22:08   #57
AndyV7o
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Jun 21st, 2021 20:47
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Creswell
Default

The 1.3cvh was rather short-lived tbf, must've made some engineering c0ck up, had a bad rep and only made for a few years. You dont make a new engine and soon replace it with the old one for nowt!

Anyhoo, best not sidetrack the thread too much!
AndyV7o is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AndyV7o For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 10th, 2018, 18:03   #58
Danders
New Member
 

Last Online: May 23rd, 2019 12:23
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Cheshire
Default

Evening chaps. Im reading this thread with interest too!

I had some time on he car on the weekend as I said and (I’ve been here many times before so say with some hesitation) I think I (we) made a breakthrough. I’m away for a few weeks now, so will confirm when I’m back, but in short summary...

- In tank pump working fine.

- Sampled fuel from test of the tank pump had no separation.

- ...cold start with the old temp sensor strapped to the block resulted in a very happy crank-flare and content idle... and then another immediately after...

Of course I excitedly retested the resistance of the two sensors at the ECU and found that they read the same.... mostly. What I had previously put down to my cheap knock off Fluke meter causing spurious readings when measuring resistance, looks like actually the new (fitted) sensor was giving spurious readings. By spurious I mean open circuit, then a second of recognisable resistance, then open circuit then various other resiatcnes in between. I guess I read what i wanted to see-the good reading and doubted my tool instead. Bad workmen eh?

I get a solid reading from the ‘old’ sensor.

I wrote on my phone so apologies for the typos, but wanted to keep you helpful people in the loop whilst away.


Now the reason I started the whole shenanigans was for poor start. First hit was the sensor. Second hit was replacing the dizzy. What I thinkbI actually did was fit a bad sensor. Then fix the dizzy, then the world of pain opened up.

Like I say though, I won’t hold my breath until a few more days running.

Thanks all so much for your help and encouragement - will Update again soon so future probalems may be more easily resolved for fellow owners.
Danders is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Danders For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 10th, 2018, 18:09   #59
AndyV7o
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Jun 21st, 2021 20:47
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Creswell
Default

Updates are always good 👍 I hate unfinished stories, of which forums have many!
AndyV7o is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AndyV7o For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 10th, 2018, 18:12   #60
Danders
New Member
 

Last Online: May 23rd, 2019 12:23
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Cheshire
Default

And the dodgy resistance readings are only on one pin of the ‘ new’ sensor. So I suspect the thermistor(?) on the pin, rather than the ground.
Danders is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
cold, rough, start


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:45.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.