|
S60 & V60 '11-'18 / XC60 '09-'17 General Forum for the P3-platform 60-series models |
Information |
|
OT: Are Volvo trying too hard?Views : 1196 Replies : 7Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Jun 1st, 2010, 17:20 | #1 |
1st time Volvo Owner
|
OT: Are Volvo trying too hard?
I know everyone wants a USP, but are Volvo simply trying too hard?
__________________
MY10 XC60 2.4D SE Lux Geartronic Savile Grey c/w soft beige leather interior Bluetooth, Dark tinted windows, Family Pack + Park Assist |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 155mph For This Useful Post: |
Jun 1st, 2010, 17:35 | #2 |
Member
Last Online: Apr 3rd, 2024 19:28
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bury
|
Bet the mechanic felt a complete plumb!!
Wonder if he still works for Volvo? |
Jun 1st, 2010, 18:53 | #3 |
Experienced Member
Last Online: Yesterday 22:49
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
|
Apparantly the message in the instrument panel said "Crash system disabled" or words to that effect , but the dummy driving cant read of course ...
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience . |
Jun 1st, 2010, 19:14 | #4 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 00:05
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: birmingham
|
since when did volvo use b*w drivers as test drivers (gets coat,,but i couldnt resist)
__________________
940s - 2l / 92 < gone&missed s401.8 xs auto <gone >V50 2.4SE Geartronic aka "the new money pit" "skyship007 has now been successfully added to your ignore list. "." |
Jun 1st, 2010, 22:06 | #5 |
Master Member
Last Online: Jun 24th, 2023 21:53
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tyne and Wear
|
They're not the only one's that forget to switch it on!! I wonder if this guy moved to Volvo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5p4G_-zf2w |
Jun 2nd, 2010, 07:55 | #6 |
1st time Volvo Owner
|
Why have a safety system which can be disabled? I mean, it is not like a driver's aid or anything.
|
Jun 2nd, 2010, 17:19 | #7 |
Experienced Member
Last Online: Yesterday 22:49
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
|
It was only disabled by the system because there was a fault code due to a flat battery the previous night ... apparantly ...
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience . |
Jun 2nd, 2010, 18:54 | #8 |
VOC Member
|
Thinking about it more, I'm not sure the explanation - even if true - justifies the accident. Would the presence of a warning light to show system failure make any difference?
My logic is this: if a particular driver actually needs the system (and would otherwise have hit the truck) he or she is incapable of:
Therefore, it's surely unrealiastic to assume that the same driver could or would:
So, my thinking is, you either don't need the system - or you would hit the truck anyway. (Unless of course, you did notice the warning light and the sight of it made you stay at home. In which case, should you have a licence?) John |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|