Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > 200 Series General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

200 Series General Forum for the Volvo 240 and 260 cars

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

K-jet

Views : 605

Replies : 6

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jul 27th, 2018, 12:34   #1
speedyG50
Member
 

Last Online: Mar 4th, 2024 23:52
Join Date: May 2007
Location: JERSEY
Default K-jet

Recently had some fuel pump issues on my 240 with K-jet.

Is it possible to install a "high flow" pump in the tank (with sender) .... and then feed direct to the filter, bypassing the current main pump and accumulator.

This mod was suggested elsewhere, but I suspect the accumulator is a very necessary part of the K-jet system and is only relevant for LH systems
speedyG50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27th, 2018, 13:28   #2
Clan
Experienced Member
 
Clan's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 11:26
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by speedyG50 View Post
Recently had some fuel pump issues on my 240 with K-jet.

Is it possible to install a "high flow" pump in the tank (with sender) .... and then feed direct to the filter, bypassing the current main pump and accumulator.

This mod was suggested elsewhere, but I suspect the accumulator is a very necessary part of the K-jet system and is only relevant for LH systems
well they did it with the later 940 but that runs at a fairly low 35 psi pressure . K Jetronic is a much higher pressure of about 75 psi so you might be hard pressed to find one as a main in-tank pump..
The accumulator has 2 functions , It compensates for any slight loss of fuel pressure when turned off , it keeps the full pressure up for at least 20 minutes afterwards , this prevents vapour locks and long cranking to start in hot weather .
The Accumulator also holds a small reserve of fuel to compensate for cornering with a near empty tank , it will keep the engine going if small amounts of air are picked up by the tank pump and circulated around the system .

Best keep it standard I think !
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience .
Clan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Clan For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 27th, 2018, 20:30   #3
Stephen Edwin
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Oct 26th, 2023 20:42
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Thurrock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clan View Post
well they did it with the later 940 but that runs at a fairly low 35 psi pressure . K Jetronic is a much higher pressure of about 75 psi so you might be hard pressed to find one as a main in-tank pump..
The accumulator has 2 functions , It compensates for any slight loss of fuel pressure when turned off , it keeps the full pressure up for at least 20 minutes afterwards , this prevents vapour locks and long cranking to start in hot weather .
The Accumulator also holds a small reserve of fuel to compensate for cornering with a near empty tank , it will keep the engine going if small amounts of air are picked up by the tank pump and circulated around the system .

Best keep it standard I think !
How about the proposal that has been reputably made in the forum to replace both pumps with one in tank pump.

Would that be something one could connect to the accumulator so as to retain the benefits of the accumulator?

Does the answer vary between K jet and LH?
Stephen Edwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27th, 2018, 20:51   #4
Clan
Experienced Member
 
Clan's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 11:26
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Edwin View Post
How about the proposal that has been reputably made in the forum to replace both pumps with one in tank pump.

Would that be something one could connect to the accumulator so as to retain the benefits of the accumulator?

Does the answer vary between K jet and LH?
K Jetronic is completely different in all ways to the electronic LH …

Yes you could use a HP pump in the tank as long as you get one which can deliver over 100 psi at full load , not that common I would think , then the line from the pump in the tank to the accumulator needs to cope with 100 + psi rather than the 25 psi of the low pressure feed pump for LH
A new LP pump in the tank would be more simple and probably more reliable than a modification .
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience .
Clan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Clan For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 27th, 2018, 21:26   #5
Stephen Edwin
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Oct 26th, 2023 20:42
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Thurrock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clan View Post
K Jetronic is completely different in all ways to the electronic LH …

Yes you could use a HP pump in the tank as long as you get one which can deliver over 100 psi at full load , not that common I would think , then the line from the pump in the tank to the accumulator needs to cope with 100 + psi rather than the 25 psi of the low pressure feed pump for LH
A new LP pump in the tank would be more simple and probably more reliable than a modification .
Thanks Clan.

My 240 doesn't have a fuel pump issue so far. I do think it important to keep the remnants of my mind (NOT a joke) prepared.

Thanks again.
Stephen Edwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27th, 2018, 22:54   #6
speedyG50
Member
 

Last Online: Mar 4th, 2024 23:52
Join Date: May 2007
Location: JERSEY
Default

Clan...
thank you for taking the time to give a comprehensive and understandable answer to my query. I knew it was to maintain pressure, but had no idea about it's other functions.... so appreciate the education and I hope others benefit from it too.
You're right of course, best not to meddle at all.... standard it is
Thanks ... and all the best
speedyG50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27th, 2018, 23:17   #7
Clan
Experienced Member
 
Clan's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 11:26
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by speedyG50 View Post
Clan...
thank you for taking the time to give a comprehensive and understandable answer to my query. I knew it was to maintain pressure, but had no idea about it's other functions.... so appreciate the education and I hope others benefit from it too.
You're right of course, best not to meddle at all.... standard it is
Thanks ... and all the best
you are welcome its a very reliable and simple system self calibrating , I used it on a 1 litre turbo engine in the 1980s and it ran well . They used it on ford escorts and VW Golfs , and the german cars in the 80's , I think volvo developed it for the 1974 140 ! I cant think of anything else that used it back then .
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience .
Clan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Clan For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:43.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.