Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > 850 / S70 & V70 '96-'99 / C70 '97-'05 General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

850 / S70 & V70 '96-'99 / C70 '97-'05 General Forum for the 850 and P80-platform 70-series models

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

850 Owners Engine of choice

Views : 11519

Replies : 70

Users Viewing This Thread :  

View Poll Results: Owners engine of choice
2.0 10v 6 1.86%
2.0 20v 19 5.88%
2.3 T5 157 48.61%
2.5 10V 42 13.00%
2.5 20V 55 17.03%
2.5 LPT 14 4.33%
2.5 tdi 30 9.29%
Voters: 323. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 25th, 2009, 09:10   #11
Paul240480
Ovlovnut
 
Paul240480's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 25th, 2024 08:58
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nivillac
Default

Mmm, difficult one really. Had a T5 manual for 4 years - fab car. Recently came back to '850 world' with a 2.5 20v GLT. Performance wise the T5 obviously leaves 2.5 standing. But the question is for a ' good all rounder'. With not at all bad performance, slighlty better fuel consumption, a little less complicated to work on, a little cheaper on insurance...........IMHO the 850 2.5GLT just takes it
__________________
2004 V70 2.4SE Auto 'The Welshmobile’
2002 Laika Ecovip 400i ( Motorhome on an Iveco 2.8TD)
http://www.gitessouthbrittany.com/
http://moncopainmonchien.jimdo.com/
Paul240480 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2009, 18:00   #12
martybelfastt5
Premier Member
 
martybelfastt5's Avatar
 

Last Online: Jul 4th, 2022 16:48
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: belfast
Default

t5 for me,,started with the 2.0,20v then had the 2.5 20v,have drove the 2.5 10v quite a few times relative owns one now drive the 2.3 20v t5 and completly love it my next will be the R/t5R i will add all of the above where great cars to me at the time but turbocharged every time here!!
martybelfastt5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2009, 21:08   #13
NewVolvo
VOC Member
 
NewVolvo's Avatar
 

Last Online: Oct 23rd, 2022 19:52
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Köln, Germany
Default

I have driven all of these engines (owned a 2.5 20v 1998-2001) and of course, T5 is fantastic (the police also thought so!!). But the best blend of performance and economy is the 2.5 20v that still lives on, albeit in a modified version in today's S40/V50 in other markets than the UK (Sweden for example).
__________________
2019 XC60 T6 R-Design
2017 S6 Avant
1996 850R
1987 780 Bertone
Lots of previous Volvo's
NewVolvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2009, 23:49   #14
s.hammond
VOC Member
 
s.hammond's Avatar
 

Last Online: Nov 23rd, 2016 06:28
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Whitehall, Bristol
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewVolvo View Post
I have driven all of these engines (owned a 2.5 20v 1998-2001) and of course, T5 is fantastic (the police also thought so!!). But the best blend of performance and economy is the 2.5 20v that still lives on, albeit in a modified version in today's S40/V50 in other markets than the UK (Sweden for example).
and the ford focus st!!!
__________________
VOC 22292
96 855 2.5 10v auto.
08 VW Golf 1.9 TDi DSG
00 Peugeot 306 1.4i LX
s.hammond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 17:58   #15
RSF
Master Member
 
RSF's Avatar
 

Last Online: May 15th, 2011 03:44
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: WALSALL/STECHFORD/BIRMINGHAM
Default

Voted for t5 as I have had a few volvo's and considering there bigger 2.3 and 20v turbos there more efficient on petrol then the other sister's.
RSF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 18:52   #16
Blue 8
Premier Member
 
Blue 8's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 13th, 2015 17:06
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Medway Towns
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by j.stuart View Post
Voted for t5 as I have had a few volvo's and considering there bigger 2.3 and 20v turbos there more efficient on petrol then the other sister's.
They are
__________________
Stay away from negative people they have a problem for every solution.

Ruby-red pearl 854 GLT 2.5 20v 62k.....Andy
Blue 8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 19:16   #17
alv70d1999
I've Been Banned
 

Last Online: Sep 28th, 2010 12:05
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: button moon
Default

id vote for the v70tdi......38+ mpg.....decent 0-60.....and who the hell wants to do over 100 mph??
alv70d1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27th, 2009, 20:35   #18
AndysR
VOC Member
 

Last Online: Nov 13th, 2023 22:12
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Essex
Default

As an all rounder which imo includes the odd occasion where you need to accelerate with some urgency then the T5 engine pips it by a galatic mile. You can drive it as quickly or as slowly as you like and it performs as smoothly as silk without hesitation. Last year I had occassion to use an n/a 2.0 20v manual for a few weeks and was quite shocked to see the petrol consumption in the same range of consumption as my Rica'd auto R. As for the lag issue compared to my last turbo'd car you would be forgiven for thinking the T5 didn't suffer from lag but I think that is more thanks to the torque of the engine when at lower engine revs than the spooling characteristics of the turbo.

Blue if your debating a T5, which I know you were at one stage recently, and you have come as far as to ask what they are like the best thing I can advise you to do is go for it whilst you can, find a good one and I am sure you won't be disappointed If your ever in the Essex area drop me a PM you can come for a ride in mine
__________________
Volvo V40 T5 R-Design Lux Nav Geartronic owner

Last edited by AndysR; May 27th, 2009 at 20:37.
AndysR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28th, 2009, 14:42   #19
Blue 8
Premier Member
 
Blue 8's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 13th, 2015 17:06
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Medway Towns
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndysR View Post
As an all rounder which imo includes the odd occasion where you need to accelerate with some urgency then the T5 engine pips it by a galatic mile. You can drive it as quickly or as slowly as you like and it performs as smoothly as silk without hesitation. Last year I had occassion to use an n/a 2.0 20v manual for a few weeks and was quite shocked to see the petrol consumption in the same range of consumption as my Rica'd auto R. As for the lag issue compared to my last turbo'd car you would be forgiven for thinking the T5 didn't suffer from lag but I think that is more thanks to the torque of the engine when at lower engine revs than the spooling characteristics of the turbo.

Blue if your debating a T5, which I know you were at one stage recently, and you have come as far as to ask what they are like the best thing I can advise you to do is go for it whilst you can, find a good one and I am sure you won't be disappointed If your ever in the Essex area drop me a PM you can come for a ride in mine
Cheers Andy

Yes im still thinking about it, well more than thinking really, im half heatedly looking for a 854 CDt5 or a S70 CD t5, ive had a few turbos before, inc a escort and a couple of Saabs which i liked very much but then both had low mileage , its the fear of a 160k+ Turbo that worries me.
__________________
Stay away from negative people they have a problem for every solution.

Ruby-red pearl 854 GLT 2.5 20v 62k.....Andy
Blue 8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28th, 2009, 17:10   #20
Cazzzooom
New Member
 

Last Online: Aug 20th, 2009 21:29
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Treharris
Default

Surely getting around turbo lag is easy, dip the clutch, up the revs and ease the clutch back in?
That's what I do anyway
Cazzzooom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:43.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.