|
PV, 120 (Amazon), 1800 General Forum for the Volvo PV, 120 and 1800 cars |
Information |
|
Amazon estate brake valveViews : 433 Replies : 3Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Mar 8th, 2018, 15:28 | #1 |
New Member
Last Online: Mar 8th, 2018 17:45
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Edinburgh
|
Amazon estate brake valve
Hello
I'm going through the single circuit brakes on a '68/'69 Amazon estate. I've come to the proportioner/accumulator valve on the line going to the rear. The brakes haven't been used for years and a the car has a non-standard engine, wheels and tyres, so I'm dubious about using the standard valve. Has anyone used a manual brake proportioning valve with success? |
Mar 8th, 2018, 16:00 | #2 | |
marches on his stomach
Last Online: Feb 11th, 2022 03:15
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
|
Quote:
With the single circuit you should also have the three piston calipers on the front: One big piston on the inner side and two smaller pistons on the outer side of the casting.
__________________
1961 Volvo PV544 the quick and easy in between project(!) 1981 Mercedes 300D <=> 230 diesel to petrol conversion project 1965 Series 2a Station Wagon mega build 1992 Mercedes 190E The car that works! |
|
Mar 8th, 2018, 16:04 | #3 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Yesterday 23:59
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Connecticut, USA
|
Bolbo;
Welcome to this Forum! That is not a proportioning valve per se...it is a pressure reducing and limiting valve whose purpose is to prevent rear wheel lockup during quick and maximum Brake applications, resulting in spinning. It has nothing to do with "non-standard engine, wheels and tyres" only Brakes, so I recommend leaving it in place, and performing some Brake tests in a safe place, to assure it is working as expected, or asking to see relative Brake proportioning report for each the corners at your next MOT. Cheers from Connecticut |
The Following User Says Thank You to Ron Kwas For This Useful Post: |
Mar 8th, 2018, 17:45 | #4 |
New Member
Last Online: Mar 8th, 2018 17:45
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Edinburgh
|
Hi Ron
I'd read a couple of your other thread posts about the valve. My concern is that the engine and box that are fitted are heavier than standard, so the weight distribution between front and rear has been changed. With more weight over and in front of the front wheels the F-R ratio may need to be more front-biased than standard. You're probably right about leaving it for now and seeing how noticeable it is. Thanks. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|