|
General Volvo and Motoring Discussions This forum is for messages of a general nature about Volvos that are not covered by other forums and other motoring related matters of interest. Users will need to register to post/reply. |
Information |
|
Review: '06 Volvo V50 2.0D SEViews : 733 Replies : 3Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Jul 27th, 2006, 20:43 | #1 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Sep 19th, 2009 21:23
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hove, Actually.
|
Review: '06 Volvo V50 2.0D SE
After dropping my S60 off at the main dealer for its service, I was pleasantly surprised to get a Volvo V50 2.0D for a courtesy car; I was expecting a base model 1.6 petrol S40! When I change my S60 (who knows when, probably in May/June 2007 when I finish Uni) I am considering a new or nearly new Volvo, and the V50 is right at the top of the list. I want a manual (which currently rules out the D5 as it is only available in Geartronic) - the sensible option is this 136hp 2.0D, the heart says to go for the 220hp T5!
On to the review... The car is very handsome, I personally prefer it with the Sport kit (lower spoiler, subtle side skirts, rear spoiler and bigger wheels) making it look a tad more aggressive and 'hip', but even in the SE trim it looks very good and well proportioned. It's completely up to date and has all its curves in the right places. The car is actually slightly bigger inside than it looks on the outside. It's certainly not a load-lugger - if you need this, try the V70; but it certainly would have enough space for a family of 4 and holiday luggage. I can see why Volvo call it a "Sportswagon". I think most buyers will be young couples and small families. At only £1,000 to £1,500 more than the equivalent S40 it's great value for money. It'll hold its value a lot better than the S40 and it looks much better too. Prices are around the £19k mark for the 2.0D and about £24k for the D5 and T5 models. The engine is a gem. It's only 136bhp, but I didn't notice much difference compared to my D5 thanks to its superb and precise 6 speed manual 'box and lower weight of the V50. The acceleration and top speed figures are very similar to the 163bhp S60 D5. It has plenty of go when you want it to and hurries up to motorway cruising speeds very smartly indeed. It sounds dieselier than my D5 on acceleration due to only having 4 cylinders but it really is very smooth. I believe the engine is the same unit Ford use in the Focus (2.0 TDCi) and Peugeot use in their 407 HDi 136. The interior is very modern and probably not to all tastes. I wasn't keen at all on the faux wood trim (so obviously false) and would advise anyone to get the aluminium trim! The seats are very supportive although not quite as good as the S60's. One thing I noticed was that the buttons on the centre console are very small and close together meaning you have to look at the console if you want to use the buttons - not really safe and a bit of a downer after the excellent ergonomics of the S60's dash. One thing that confused me was the positioning of the ignition - rather than being to the right of the steering column as you would expect, it is on the left up on the dash - despite having the car for two days and many trips every time I attempted to insert the key where the ignition would usually be found. I'm sure any new owner would get used to this eventually but its a bit of an odd decision to place it where it is located behind the indicator stalk? The hi-fi was good, but not stunning and I would recommend the upgrade to the premium (4x70w) sound system if you like your music. I averaged 46.2mpg with a mixture of driving including plenty of traffic, town work and fast motorway around Sussex and the Isle of Wight. This is very similar to what my more powerful D5 would achieve in the same circumstances, but the car only had a couple of thousand miles on it so has yet to reach its optimum economy. Would I buy one? I would certainly buy the V50, as a car it is great, I think I would be VERY tempted by the T5 version and I have a test drive sorted for my return from my holiday towards the end of August. Definitely a case of whether the head or the heart rules the purse strings! Good Points Great looking, comfortable seats, modern interior, value for money, perfect engine/gearbox matching. Bad Points Fake wood dash, ignition position on dash, small buttons on centre console, tiny glovebox.
__________________
MY97 S70 T5 CD - Now with added Milltek! |
Jul 28th, 2006, 11:31 | #2 |
Junior Member
Last Online: Sep 7th, 2023 00:37
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NW Leicestershire
|
When did they start doing the S40/V50 with the D5 and geartronic?
When I was looking for a car at the end of last year I dismissed them as there wasn't a diesel automatic available. (Still glad I got the S60 though ) Alistair |
Jul 28th, 2006, 13:47 | #3 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Sep 19th, 2009 21:23
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hove, Actually.
|
Quote:
The S60 is more comfortable and has a better designed interior.
__________________
MY97 S70 T5 CD - Now with added Milltek! |
|
Jul 30th, 2006, 11:27 | #4 |
Member
Last Online: Sep 26th, 2014 03:40
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: forfar
|
I agree with everything you say about the V50 as my wife has a 2.0d SE and it's great. BTW the the ignition is in that position so that in an accident the hard lock mechanism doesn't get rammed into the driver's knee - quite a few new model cars are like this now, Audi A6 etc.
Jon |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|