Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > 850 / S70 & V70 '96-'99 / C70 '97-'05 General

Notices

850 / S70 & V70 '96-'99 / C70 '97-'05 General Forum for the 850 and P80-platform 70-series models

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

RICA 280 vs. 304

Views : 9608

Replies : 150

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Sep 10th, 2005, 19:32   #1
bobcat
Premier Member
 
bobcat's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 20th, 2024 11:59
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

i say rica 280, dont think you will notice much between the 2. you can allways put a few turns on the gate if you want and extra psi or 2.

i say give both a test drive and see what you like. i wonder if vt have changed things like spool up and throttle response to make customers choose the 304 program which makes em more money.

considering that i doubt your car or others for that fact will record 304 on a dyno i say get the 280.

or see whether they will do a deal on a custom map that is matched to your car.

__________________
Volvo 850R Auto,173K,Bobcat\SW Autos Ecu,18T,Reverse IC,13 Row Engine Oil Cooler,39 Row ATF Cooler,20psi VDO Boost Gauge,6000k HID's (low), Osram 50% Silverstars (High),ITG Filter,OEM Strutbrace,Aerial Down Switch,302mm Front Discs,Ferodo DS2500 Front/Rear,Goodridge SS Hoses,Koni Adjustable Dampers,Eibach Pro Kit, Powerflex Control Arm Bushes, Clear Side Repeaters.
http://www.swautos.co.uk
SW Auto's Ebay Shop
http://www.volvo-tech.co.uk
bobcat is offline  
Old Sep 10th, 2005, 20:35   #2
sholtby
Premier Member
 
sholtby's Avatar
 

Last Online: May 26th, 2010 20:17
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: north east
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

I'm sure Adam could let you try both. I've got the 305 and it transformed the car, cant comment on the 280 version as I've never experienced it. Its definately a must do though.

Simon
sholtby is offline  
Old Sep 10th, 2005, 20:40   #3
volvotuning
Guest
 

Location:
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

You definately notice the difference between the two. However...

On the 850 models we now tend to recommend the 280 upgrade for the simple reason that you often need to spend money on other items to get the car up to scratch so that you can make the most of the 304. For the 850 models with high mileage and owners not wanting to spend a fortune on them, the 280 upgrade is for that purpose.

By opting for the 280, not only does it cost you less to buy, it lets you run on 95 all day long and is not so picky about things like plugs etc, so overall it costs less to run too.

Price for the 280 is £290 + VAT and includes diagnostics and testing.

Price for the 304 is £400 + VAT and includes diagnostics, actuator adjustment, and other post upgrade checks to ensure maximum performance.

Adam.
 
Old Sep 10th, 2005, 21:09   #4
imac
Premier Member
 
imac's Avatar
 

Last Online: Sep 19th, 2009 21:23
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hove, Actually.
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

>You definately notice the difference between the two.
>However...
>
>On the 850 models we now tend to recommend the 280 upgrade for
>the simple reason that you often need to spend money on other
>items to get the car up to scratch so that you can make the
>most of the 304. For the 850 models with high mileage and
>owners not wanting to spend a fortune on them, the 280 upgrade
>is for that purpose.

Hi Adam, can you go into more detail about the "other items" ? The engine in my car has done 65k (as has turbo) but the g/box and rest of the car has done 122k? Maybe I could bring my car up to you so you can see if it is "up to scratch" for the 304?


>By opting for the 280, not only does it cost you less to buy,
>it lets you run on 95 all day long and is not so picky about
>things like plugs etc, so overall it costs less to run too.

I'm not too worried about running costs, my mileage is mega low so I'm happy to put Optimax in all the time if needs be, it doesn't make a huge difference to my fuel bill at less than 5k miles a year :)


>Price for the 304 is £400 + VAT and includes diagnostics,
>actuator adjustment, and other post upgrade checks to ensure
>maximum performance.

Thats cheaper than I thought it was...


Darren

__________________
MY97 S70 T5 CD - Now with added Milltek!
imac is offline  
Old Sep 10th, 2005, 21:19   #5
sholtby
Premier Member
 
sholtby's Avatar
 

Last Online: May 26th, 2010 20:17
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: north east
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

Fuel economy didnt vary much with my car after the upgrade. I still get on average 26/27 mpg driving quite hard.


Simon
sholtby is offline  
Old Sep 10th, 2005, 21:34   #6
IC
S60R/V70R
 
IC's Avatar
 

Last Online: Yesterday 12:36
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Brumbeldore
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

Hi Adam, can you include the VAT inclusive price when quoting your prices as per the new rules as it makes it easier for people to see what the total price is. It would be also very useful to list the expected performance increases in bhp and torque or have a link to data showing the expected performance increases after chipping that forum members can expect if they invest in your products.

__________________
2003 S60R
2003 V70R

VOC Speed Challenge Champion 2007/08/Joint Winner 2009
Motor Sport Challenge Winner 2008/Joint Winner 2009

<font size=2><font color=RoyalBlue>
</font></font>






IC is offline  
Old Sep 10th, 2005, 21:54   #7
imac
Premier Member
 
imac's Avatar
 

Last Online: Sep 19th, 2009 21:23
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hove, Actually.
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

>Hi Adam, can you include the VAT inclusive price when quoting
>your prices as per the new rules as it makes it easier for
>people to see what the total price is. It would be also very
>useful to list the expected performance increases in bhp and
>torque or have a link to data showing the expected performance
>increases after chipping that forum members can expect if they
>invest in your products.
>
>

£340.75 & £470

But yes, Adam - what is the torque figure for the 280 version?
__________________
MY97 S70 T5 CD - Now with added Milltek!
imac is offline  
Old Sep 11th, 2005, 16:29   #8
volvotuning
Guest
 

Location:
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

I will check on Monday for you.

Adam.
 
Old Oct 6th, 2005, 23:08   #9
Richieb
Guest
 

Location:
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

Why did everyone stop posting? Just about nearly convinced myself that this was an essential 'item' for my T5.
Just incase anyone reads this, the 280 would be best if no more mods were going to be made yes???

Richie.
 
Old Oct 7th, 2005, 10:28   #10
don kalmar union
Trader
 
don kalmar union's Avatar
 

Last Online: Yesterday 22:32
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chesham, buckinghamshire
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

Good day Richard,

Just to restate the case once again....

With the earlier 850 T5 or T5R you will never, ever see a figure in excess of 280bhp for just a software rewrite on one of these cars.

They are limited in this respect by any number of mechanical shortcomings, to say nothing of increased wear and tear on these ageing vehicles. To take the matter further you would be hard pressed to see 285bhp with minimum expenditure of £1500 or so more than a software rewrite on an engine in first class order on one of these older cars.

There is now a large and still growing body of evidence that this is the true position on these earlier cars.

It is just a plain lack of honesty..maybe stupidity or gullibility for any party, be they a supplier or user to make exagerated and/or unachievable claims for a product and its effect in this respect.


Don.Norchi.

www.kalmar-union.com

TME software for serious Volvo Tuning.
don kalmar union is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:58.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.