|
General Volvo and Motoring Discussions This forum is for messages of a general nature about Volvos that are not covered by other forums and other motoring related matters of interest. Users will need to register to post/reply. |
Information |
|
V50 and V60. 1.6 or 2.0 dieselViews : 4858 Replies : 11Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Apr 17th, 2012, 19:54 | #1 |
New Member
Last Online: Apr 17th, 2012 19:54
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: gloucester
|
V50 and V60. 1.6 or 2.0 diesel
Hi all
I am thinking of getting the Volvo V50 or the V60 (if I can afford it) now im looking at the 1,6 nad the 2.0 diesel se versions. The guy at the dealership reccomended the 1.6ltr. I usually go for 2ltr options as i do around 150 miles per day. Any comments or reccomendations would be great on the engines and the cars |
Apr 17th, 2012, 19:59 | #2 |
Probably Akita's Toyboy..
Last Online: Dec 27th, 2023 22:24
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: A House.
|
it depends you will get a much better deal on a v50 as it is a run out car. the 1.6 has less go but better tax a lot lower not as much grunt as the 2.0 which is a five cylinder (D3 or D4) but you pay for it in tax really.
|
Apr 17th, 2012, 20:37 | #3 | |
VOC Member
Last Online: Feb 26th, 2016 19:58
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Exmouth
|
Quote:
If economy is your main driving factor then definitely go for the 1.6 but if it is all round usability then go for a 2.0. I think with a 150 daily trip then you would enjoy the 2.0d better, of course best thing is to have a good test drive with both engines. I found with the 1.6d that I was forever doing excess gearchanges hunting, searching and chasing the fuel economy of the annoying economy indicator on the info display. In the end I gave up and drove normally and of course the fuel economy suffers. The 2.0 is just far better all round to me, good gear changes at the right point and speed to allow me to drive normal (easy going) without the excess gear changes and chasing the economy factor. It really did suit the car perfectly. Last edited by SonyVaio; Apr 17th, 2012 at 20:47. |
|
Apr 17th, 2012, 21:14 | #4 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Jul 24th, 2015 16:09
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: oxford
|
Bigger is always best. Forget the road tax savings, its your right foot doing the buying! Go for a 2 litre at the very least.Try both, but I imagine you will find the 2 litre better unless you are a tree hugger!
|
Apr 17th, 2012, 23:38 | #5 |
Premier Member
Last Online: May 30th, 2020 21:59
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Aberdeen/Huddersfield
|
Buy the 1.6d and remap it for a bit of extra poke, you'll maintain the efficiency (unless you boot it all the time, :P) and cheaper tax but should still have enough power for day to day driving.
If modifying isn't your thing, I'd go for the 2.0d, it's gutsy enough for just about any situation and still returns well at the pumps, where as a standard 1.6d is a bit weedy for a car this size. |
Apr 18th, 2012, 09:51 | #6 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Jul 24th, 2015 16:09
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: oxford
|
Dont see the point in buying a smaller engined car, remapping the electronics and expecting miracles. Start off with a good base, 2.0 ; and then if you must remap. Better result in the end. Not saying the 1.6 is a turd, but you cant polish a turd!
|
Apr 18th, 2012, 09:57 | #7 | ||||
VOC Member
Last Online: Feb 26th, 2016 19:58
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Exmouth
|
Quote:
|
||||
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|