Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "General Topics" > General Volvo and Motoring Discussions
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

General Volvo and Motoring Discussions This forum is for messages of a general nature about Volvos that are not covered by other forums and other motoring related matters of interest. Users will need to register to post/reply.

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Horrible solution for intake manifold/EGR soot recall "fix"

Views : 1416

Replies : 5

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jul 1st, 2023, 22:17   #1
mattjeu
New Member
 

Last Online: Dec 6th, 2023 11:30
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: london
Default Horrible solution for intake manifold/EGR soot recall "fix"

Hi All,

In 2019, we had 2 (even 3 or 4) recalls for the 2014 V60 D4 cars, the one's I am most angry about are the EGR / intake manifold carbon buildup recalls. Volvo delivered the 4-cil D4202T5 and other diesel engines in the V60 diesels in 2014 and later. So much gunk could build up in the EGR system including the air intake manifold, that it could actually catch fire.
Instead of really fixing the issue, they decided to do a "software update" that warns users when your car is about to catch fire. (simply said)

This is what I learned from reading about it on several posts and the recall descriptions itself.

So, if you have an engine with this EGR circuit, it's supposed to be Euro-6. however since this and last year, several european countries started with particle filter measuring of diesels, causing thousands of diesels to fail and not pass the yearly check.
Some of those have removed the DPF filter but many are unsuspecting customers like me, who paid thousands of euro's over the lifespan of the car on maintenance and parts.

Looking with wide open eyes at the youtube video's on cleaning this EGR system and the intake manifold, I am wondering how a company like Volvo would willingly allow their customers to destroy their engines with carbon buildup where "clean" air should be.
Of course the emission is affected by this carbon and soot on the intake. and of course your oil will get dirty and clog the piston rings. It will also destroy your DPF filter much sooner then needed. Why not do the right thing and periodically clean this gunk off?

I am paying 80 euro for a crappy interior filter but my engine is destroying itself with crap from the exhaust and nothing is cleaned?

Is anybody suing Volvo for this? can they really get away with a crappy fix for this serious recall? I will ask for Volvo to do the right thing and not let me pay full price for cleaning something that they designed..
No Volvo diesel with EGR like this will reach 300.000 without falling apart I think..

Sorry its my first post but after my car failing the emissions test I started reading and my love and respect for Volvo has plummeted. I could say goodbye forever and spread the story about how a "quality" brand like Volvo destroys the environment not by emissions but by destroying their own product prematurely causing more cars needing to be build and sold. great...
mattjeu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1st, 2023, 22:23   #2
Familyman 90
The Brit Brick
 
Familyman 90's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 13th, 2023 09:39
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Warwickshire
Default

What about the engines that have reached 300k miles and didn't fall apart?
__________________
2005 C70 2.4T Collection convertible. 40,000 mile sunny day toy.
Familyman 90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1st, 2023, 22:36   #3
mattjeu
New Member
 

Last Online: Dec 6th, 2023 11:30
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: london
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Familyman 90 View Post
What about the engines that have reached 300k miles and didn't fall apart?
I guess betting red or black in a casino makes a good comparison.. At least looking at some of the news articles;

https://dieselnet.com/news/2023/01npti.php
https://lenews.ch/2023/03/24/new-pol...f-swiss-roads/

(many more in Dutch/Belgian/German language)

At least the parts needed (sometimes a new DPF filter is all you need) are also not available.. many have severe shortages in demand vs supply.
mattjeu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1st, 2023, 23:03   #4
Familyman 90
The Brit Brick
 
Familyman 90's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 13th, 2023 09:39
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Warwickshire
Default

I think you missed my point.

Exaggeration and misrepresentation is pointless, no matter how unhappy you may be.

Your 300,000 mile comment served no purpose and is apocryphal, so why bother?

And the other issue is that EGR reduces NOx, quite considerably when working properly. Particulate filters are exactly as the name describes. You could disconnect the EGR or even blank it off entirely and it will not cause a car to fail a particulate or smoke opacity test. In terms of function and effect they are unrelated systems.

And the mechanism behind piston ring gumming is a third matter entirely.

I do not doubt that you have problems, but you're attributing cause and effect in the wrong places.
__________________
2005 C70 2.4T Collection convertible. 40,000 mile sunny day toy.

Last edited by Familyman 90; Jul 1st, 2023 at 23:05.
Familyman 90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2nd, 2023, 11:02   #5
Sotosound
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Yesterday 22:53
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Aylesbury
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Familyman 90 View Post
I think you missed my point.

Exaggeration and misrepresentation is pointless, no matter how unhappy you may be.

Your 300,000 mile comment served no purpose and is apocryphal, so why bother?

And the other issue is that EGR reduces NOx, quite considerably when working properly. Particulate filters are exactly as the name describes. You could disconnect the EGR or even blank it off entirely and it will not cause a car to fail a particulate or smoke opacity test. In terms of function and effect they are unrelated systems.

And the mechanism behind piston ring gumming is a third matter entirely.

I do not doubt that you have problems, but you're attributing cause and effect in the wrong places.
What would be your attributions?
__________________
2014 Volvo V70 D4 (VEA) SE Lux Geartronic
Sotosound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2nd, 2023, 23:22   #6
Chris1Roll
Senior Member
 
Chris1Roll's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 07:00
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cannington
Default

Doesn't strike me as something specific to Volvo - Manufacturers had to fit this tech to meet the standards, and anything with EGR is going to fill itself up with soot, thats just the way it is.


If you are going to clean it out, make sure you wear some nitrile gloves. Some of the particles are so small, trans-dermal absorption is a possibility
Chris1Roll is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chris1Roll For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
air intake, dpf, egr, lawsuit, recall


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:04.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.