|
XC90 '02–'15 General Forum for the P2-platform XC90 model |
Information |
|
2009 xc90 parking brake MOTViews : 653 Replies : 6Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Apr 14th, 2018, 22:12 | #1 |
minstrelblue
Last Online: Apr 1st, 2023 21:26
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: upminster
|
2009 xc90 parking brake MOT
hi, i understand they don't use rollers for 4x4 on MOT's but use a decelerometer, but last year the MOT tester did a rolling road test for my parking brake and then promptly failed it. i said that was bonkers cos that's not designed for that, it's a heavy vehicle and the parking brake on the drum is small and only designed as a parking brake not to slow it down at 30mph!!!, nevertheless it cost me a hundred quid to strip them down despite them working well when parking as it is designed for. so my question is.. is it right for an mot to test a xc90 parking brake on the move
|
Apr 14th, 2018, 22:21 | #2 |
Volvo Driver
Last Online: Today 21:30
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Basingstoke
|
As usual, Google is your friend (or not...)
http://www.ukmot.com/manual/3.1/Parking-Brake-Control Cheers Dave |
Apr 14th, 2018, 22:34 | #3 |
Master Member
Last Online: Feb 28th, 2023 20:25
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Wirral
|
So, reading this, with a foot operated parking brake, it doesn't require testing on a rolling road.
That's interesting. Another question: With these being "permanent" 4wd, can the brakes be tested on rolling road, or do they have to use a decelerometer? My last 4wg (Toyota Estima) had to use the decelerometer, but that was a more primitive 4wd system.
__________________
2003 V70 2.4SE Auto. Gone now. 2003 XC90 D5. Auto. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Father Ted For This Useful Post: |
Apr 14th, 2018, 23:00 | #4 |
Bungling Amateur
Last Online: Today 16:37
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Beverley, East Yorks
|
Any post 2003 AWD Volvo model should be tested on a rolling road at MOT, there is no reason for it not to be. For some reason many MOT testers don’t seem to understand how to determine the drivetrain type.
I had my 08 XC70 tested last weekend and I almost had to beg the tester to put it on the rollers - my wife drives that car and I wanted to know that all four corners were braking as they should. The only cars that can’t be tested on the rollers are thermo viscous coupling AWD cars which include Freelander Mk1 and pre-2003 model year Volvo. To the OP yes it is correct that the parking brake is tested on the move. It’s is a big, heavy car all the more reason it needs a good parking brake. The pass level for the decelerometer test is way below what a good, working XC90 parking brake should achieve.
__________________
2011 XC90 D5 Executive 2003 C70 T5 GT 2012 Ford Ranger XL SC 1977 Triumph Spitfire 1500 1976 Massey Ferguson 135 Last edited by Tannaton; Apr 14th, 2018 at 23:06. |
Apr 14th, 2018, 23:09 | #5 | |
Experienced Member
Last Online: Today 23:09
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
|
Quote:
which ever method is used they are testing for an efficiency of at least 16% which isn't that good , older cars with single circuit brakes are tested to 25% for the parking brake ...
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience . |
|
Apr 15th, 2018, 07:49 | #6 | |
Bungling Amateur
Last Online: Today 16:37
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Beverley, East Yorks
|
Quote:
**EDIT: Mine is a early P3 XC70 with Gen3 Haldex (they changed to Gen4 in MY 2009 for the P3) but I believe that was the generation when "instant traction" was introduced?
__________________
2011 XC90 D5 Executive 2003 C70 T5 GT 2012 Ford Ranger XL SC 1977 Triumph Spitfire 1500 1976 Massey Ferguson 135 Last edited by Tannaton; Apr 15th, 2018 at 09:49. |
|
Apr 15th, 2018, 10:00 | #7 |
Junior Member
Last Online: Dec 15th, 2023 17:11
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Wetherby
|
All you could possibly want to know courtesy of SwissXC90
https://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=279043 |
The Following User Says Thank You to Barnacle58 For This Useful Post: |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|