|
|||||||
Information
|
|
Stainless ExhaustViews : 1775 Replies : 26Users Viewing This Thread : |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Mar 22nd, 2018, 20:59
|
#11 |
|
Trader Volvo in my veins
Last Online: Yesterday 21:47
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Anglesey
|
the IRS exhaust is nothing like the 940 exhaust due to the axle
|
|
|
|
Mar 22nd, 2018, 21:08
|
#12 |
|
VOC Member
Last Online: Apr 24th, 2022 15:52
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Portsmouth
|
Dai, thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 23rd, 2018, 19:58
|
#13 |
|
New Member
Last Online: Aug 15th, 2018 00:31
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Cumbria
|
Looks like a no go then, appreciate you sending the photos though
Cheers |
|
|
|
|
Apr 8th, 2018, 15:31
|
#14 |
|
New Member
Last Online: Aug 15th, 2018 00:31
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Cumbria
|
Still looking...
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 8th, 2018, 17:30
|
#15 |
|
Premier Member
Last Online: Nov 23rd, 2023 14:26
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Haltwhistle
|
I have a 2-and-a-quarter-inch one for non-cat (or cut it), not including downpipe. Fits my 940 Estate, goes over the back axle nicely.
Originally bought on this forum from Martin, solved that year's annoying exhaust problems, now sitting in storage. I'll find the link. (Found it! https://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=230599 ) Whereabouts in Cumbria are you?
__________________
1993 2.0 Turbo SE with 1991 2.0 Turbo engine. Older is better! Last edited by Dirty Rooster; Apr 8th, 2018 at 17:44. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 8th, 2018, 20:01
|
#16 |
|
New Member
Last Online: Aug 15th, 2018 00:31
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Cumbria
|
That looks like it would do the job, direct fit to the standard downpipe ?
What sort of money are you wanting for it ? Kendal... so not to far away really, just not sure when I could get up that way Cheers Last edited by CLH92; Apr 8th, 2018 at 20:48. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 9th, 2018, 17:12
|
#17 |
|
Premier Member
Last Online: Nov 23rd, 2023 14:26
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Haltwhistle
|
I will dust it off and post a current photo, gimme a couple of days.
__________________
1993 2.0 Turbo SE with 1991 2.0 Turbo engine. Older is better! |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dirty Rooster For This Useful Post: |
|
Apr 11th, 2018, 18:35
|
#18 |
|
Premier Member
Last Online: Nov 23rd, 2023 14:26
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Haltwhistle
|
I've not got the exhaust out for photos yet because I'm still doing work for my MOT.
Track rods, handbrake, battery clamp all done and now ... ball joint.
__________________
1993 2.0 Turbo SE with 1991 2.0 Turbo engine. Older is better! |
|
|
|
|
Apr 12th, 2018, 17:40
|
#19 |
|
New Member
Last Online: Aug 15th, 2018 00:31
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Cumbria
|
That's fine... if it's still in similar condition to when you bought it ... im interested
Have you got a price in mind ? |
|
|
|
|
Apr 12th, 2018, 19:04
|
#20 | |
|
Premier Member
Last Online: Nov 23rd, 2023 14:26
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Haltwhistle
|
Quote:
Anyway, tie rods in, track rod ends on, ball joint in, Bingo! MOT passed. I can now devote myself to all the stuff that's had to wait three days. Oh wait, chicken dinner's arrived.
__________________
1993 2.0 Turbo SE with 1991 2.0 Turbo engine. Older is better! |
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
