Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > S80 '98-'06 / S60 '00-'09 / V70 & XC70 '00-'07 General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

S80 '98-'06 / S60 '00-'09 / V70 & XC70 '00-'07 General Forum for the P2-platform S60 / V70 / XC70 / S80 models

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

2.0T to 2.4 T5 - How difficult?

Views : 1363

Replies : 7

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Oct 11th, 2017, 21:03   #1
T5R92011
FCW Auto Service
 
T5R92011's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 22nd, 2024 19:40
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Gloucester
Default 2.0T to 2.4 T5 - How difficult?

Please do not suggest "easier to by a T5" because I wouldn't find a T5 with the same spec/colour/age as my 2.0T... I really like my car and want to run it into the ground, but I need that 2.4 T5 engine in my life. I could buy a 2.5T with a matching spec, but they split their liners when tuned.

I have the newer 'revised' 2.0T engine with both Exhaust and Intake VVT Cams, which I believe is the same setup as the later 2.4 T5.

Has anybody been successful with engine swaps on these cars? Over on Swedespeed, some say the engine will actually run on the original ECU (although very rough) so will need a custom T5 map.. Others say you have to swap literally everything over including the ECU and "its not worth it" etc.

Thoughts?
__________________
FCW Auto Service (Gloucester)
https://www.fcw-autoservice.com

Last edited by T5R92011; Oct 11th, 2017 at 21:05.
T5R92011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12th, 2017, 00:14   #2
cheshired5
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Dec 26th, 2021 13:42
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Crewe
Default

The mechanical hardware should all be easily doable by comparison but I would say that it's an
ECM/software/electronic minefield.
I would begin by finding someone who really knows their stuff in that area and get guarantees from them if they're confident but I honestly can't see a happy or cost effective ending.
I couldn't fit an SRS module on a potential purchase without massive expense so an ECM will be worse.
__________________
2002 S60 SE D5 Manual
209000 miles
cheshired5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12th, 2017, 16:12   #3
DT19
Master Member
 

Last Online: Yesterday 18:48
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: York
Default

I've thought about this as well. The route I'd considered to get around the ecu issue was to swap just the engine block, crankshaft, pistons etc. I think I saw somewhere that the stroke is the same as the 2.0T just the bore is bigger.

It'll only work if the heads are the same, including valve diameters and lift but it might work.

I'll stand back and watch, you do it and if it works I might do mine
DT19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 14th, 2017, 14:48   #4
DT19
Master Member
 

Last Online: Yesterday 18:48
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: York
Default

Have you tried putting in some blue injectors getting your car remapped. It made quite a difference to mine.
DT19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2018, 16:50   #5
T5R92011
FCW Auto Service
 
T5R92011's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 22nd, 2024 19:40
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Gloucester
Default

Just comparing the stats on the two engines:

B5244T5 (2.4 T5)
The B5244T5 is a 2.4 L (2,401 cc) straight-five. Bore is 81 mm (3.2 in) and stroke is 93.2 mm (3.7 in) with a compression ratio of 9.0:1. It is turbocharged and intercooled with a power output of 260 PS (191 kW; 256 hp) at 5500 rpm with 350 N⋅m (260 lb⋅ft) of torque at 2100 rpm. It features VVT for both intake and exhaust cam. It is equipped with a BorgWarner K24 turbocharger.

B5204T5 (2.0T)
The B5204T5 is a 2.0 L (1,984 cc) straight-five. Bore is 81 mm (3.2 in) and stroke is 77 mm (3.0 in) with a compression ratio of 9.5:1. It is turbocharged and intercooled with a power output of 180 PS (132 kW; 178 hp) at 5300 rpm, and produces 240 N⋅m (180 lb⋅ft) of torque at 2000–5300 rpm.

I know that my late 2.0T has VVT for both intake and exhaust like the 2.4 T5... Perhaps a block swap etc is the way to go to avoid computer trouble.

You know where it gets to the point that you've spent so much on maintaining your car anyway, that you might as well just keep it and do something stupid with it?!
__________________
FCW Auto Service (Gloucester)
https://www.fcw-autoservice.com
T5R92011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2018, 17:08   #6
100K+
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Yesterday 16:40
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Newcastle
Default

Daft question but .... do you have to change anything but the crank??? In the 70's the 1485cc Austin Maxi was stroked out to 1748cc with no more than a crank change. Ok times change, but would Volvo make a dedicated 2.0 litre block/pistons etc. if they did not have to, that's a lot of needless expense don't you think?

Additionally Austin then added two extra cylinders to the 1485cc to make the 2227cc engine for the Landcrab and Princess models.

Cheers
Bob
100K+ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2018, 18:21   #7
Sojournermike
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Jan 10th, 2020 13:18
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Harrogate
Default

I think you might need new rods and pistons to avoid clashes and the compression ratio being too high
Sojournermike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2018, 18:23   #8
jgjones095
Master Member
 

Last Online: Feb 28th, 2024 22:04
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: South wales
Default

Why not buy a T5 then do a bare shell swap?

Back in the hot hatch 90s it was possible with a citroen ax/ saxo VTS.... granted before the CAN bus days!
__________________
Who said Volvos were build to last?

2.4t V70XC Auto 2001 165k
D5 185 XC70 M66 2006 202k
jgjones095 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:28.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.