Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "General Topics" > General Volvo and Motoring Discussions
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

General Volvo and Motoring Discussions This forum is for messages of a general nature about Volvos that are not covered by other forums and other motoring related matters of interest. Users will need to register to post/reply.

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

"Official" fuel consumption figures

Views : 943

Replies : 8

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Sep 29th, 2008, 15:03   #1
John_C
Allons-y!
 
John_C's Avatar
 

Last Online: Jun 8th, 2020 15:32
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Winchester
Default "Official" fuel consumption figures

I'm car hunting at the moment and over and over again on owner's reviews, forums and from talking to people I hear the same thing over and over again - how annoyed they are that the fuel economy doesn't match the manufacturer's claimed figures.

There seems to be a very common misconception about these fuel figures. The "manufacturer figures" are in fact EU standard fuel consumption tests.

The authorities themselves acknowledge they are not representative of real life driving:

http://www.vcacarfueldata.org.uk/inf...dard-Tests.asp

There is a link to how the tests are run here:

http://www.vcacarfueldata.org.uk/inf...ing-scheme.asp

You might also want to take a look at this article from The Times which goes into far more detail than I can be bothered with

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/dri...cle2214542.ece

So if you can't achieve the "manufacturer MPG figures" don't be surprised.

Your best bet is to ask for real world MPG figures from owners, as many people already do on this forum and others.

Cheers,
John
John_C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29th, 2008, 16:50   #2
222s
Amazoniste
 
222s's Avatar
 

Last Online: Sep 19th, 2016 21:52
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Emsworth
Default

Those explanation links were very interesting. Given that the tests are entirely on a rolling road, can we presume that crucial factors like the vehicle weight and aerodynamics aren't part of the equation? If so, then imho the 'official' figures are about as useful as that piece of paper which Mr Chamberlain brought back from Munich 70 years ago.....
__________________

Paul - 1967 Amazon 222S B20 o/d Estate & 1961 A-H Sprite Mk2 948cc

WANTED - For '67 Amazon estate - offside rear quarter, preferably new old stock.
222s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29th, 2008, 19:03   #3
Seeker_UK
Member
 

Last Online: Dec 16th, 2022 22:06
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wellingborough
Default

Interesting links.

In my experience though, always be pessimistic and base your fuel consumption on being no better than the 'urban' figure.

If that depresses you too much, I usually estimate at fuel consumption which is about 80% of the Parkers combined figure.
Seeker_UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29th, 2008, 19:28   #4
Clan
Experienced Member
 
Clan's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 11:31
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
Default

These "manufacturer-Figures" are for one purpose only , and that is comparing one car/make/model against another as the equipment is standard so takes out all the variables you find on the road . They may or may not give an indication of what you are likely to achieve on the road in any particular car . In any case the same car on the same journey could get wildly different figures . eg i have seen C70 D5 's showing an average of 19 mpg ( ave speed 25 mph) the lowest i remember to 45 mpg ( ave speed 45 mph ) The average speed is the critical factor as well .
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience .
Clan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29th, 2008, 21:02   #5
Seeker_UK
Member
 

Last Online: Dec 16th, 2022 22:06
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wellingborough
Default

Manufacturers figures are always uber-optimistic because they are usually not derived from real driving - ie taking the car on the road. The usual way is by using a rolling road, indoors, so free from stop-start and acceleration / braking.

One effect of this is that quoted CO2 emission figures are also lower than what they actually put out.
Seeker_UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 1st, 2008, 11:01   #6
GSS
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Today 12:36
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Now further south and west
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 222s View Post
....the 'official' figures are about as useful as that piece of paper which Mr Chamberlain brought back from Munich 70 years ago.....
LOL I like the analogy!
GSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 1st, 2008, 11:46   #7
ovlov25
Premier Member
 
ovlov25's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 1st, 2022 23:02
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Antrim
Default

What cars are you looking at John?
__________________
I want I want I want!!!
ovlov25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 1st, 2008, 12:11   #8
John_C
Allons-y!
 
John_C's Avatar
 

Last Online: Jun 8th, 2020 15:32
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Winchester
Default

Everything and anything mate With the market as it is at the moment there are some blinding lease deals around at the moment, nearly picked up a brand new 58-plate Merc SLK for £350 a month but I was too tall for it. Also found a blinding deal on a Civic Type-R but the seat was just too uncomfortable for my.... ahhhh.... how to put this..... "ample frame" (fat arse ).

Lexus IS220d is a possible at the moment, just looking for confirmation of the deal at the moment as the offer may have finished.

Not discounting Volvos at all, I very much like the new C70 and the S80 plus the C30 D5 is nice too, but the deals just aren't there on them at the moment.

The sort of leasing deals I've been seeing mean you can lease the car over two years for less than the depreciation on a used one. Talking to a few separate leasing agents they all say the same thing - it's down to stock being cleared at the end of financial years/reporting periods and there being excess stock in the supply chain due to the downturn.

All good fun.....

Cheers,
John
John_C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 1st, 2008, 12:28   #9
ovlov25
Premier Member
 
ovlov25's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 1st, 2022 23:02
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Antrim
Default

Sounds fun, I must be in the wrong line of work!!

I take it then its not really a company car scheme? surely you would get hammered with tax etc if it was.

The lexus is a nice car, would be my choice
__________________
I want I want I want!!!
ovlov25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:54.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.