Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > 200 Series General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

200 Series General Forum for the Volvo 240 and 260 cars

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

MOT fail for CO2 - adjusting a Stromberg 175 CDUS

Views : 1498

Replies : 16

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Aug 13th, 2018, 10:23   #1
Bugjam1999
Master Member
 

Last Online: Apr 26th, 2024 12:00
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: London and Cambridge
Default MOT fail for CO2 - adjusting a Stromberg 175 CDUS

Hi all,

I have a 1978 245 fitted with a Stromberg 175 CDUS which has failed the MOT as CO2 levels were too high. I haven't done anything to the carb yet, so a starting point is to strip it down, clean it and put it back together.

I can see from receipts from the previous owner that a new jet and needle were fitted in 2011, which equates to about 55,000 miles ago based on MOT mileages. I guess they're due for replacement then - although I'll look at them first to see if there's any obvious damage.

I also have a complete carb from another car which had 90k on it, but I have no idea how good it is or whether the jet and needle in that were ever replaced etc.

My question then - how do I/the garage go about adjusting the carb? I don't have a co2 meter so it'll have to be the garage realistically. I've seen a few threads online, most usefully this one:

https://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=100472

But I'm not sure if my carb is an earlier or later type, as referred to in that thread.

It looks like this:



Any comments/help/advice? From the thread above I think if the dashpot is removed the needle can be raised up and down to adjust the mixture via a special tool, is that correct?

Thanks
Bugjam1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 13th, 2018, 11:10   #2
Clan
Experienced Member
 
Clan's Avatar
 

Last Online: Yesterday 22:51
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bugjam1999 View Post
Hi all,

I have a 1978 245 fitted with a Stromberg 175 CDUS which has failed the MOT as CO2 levels were too high. I haven't done anything to the carb yet, so a starting point is to strip it down, clean it and put it back together.

I can see from receipts from the previous owner that a new jet and needle were fitted in 2011, which equates to about 55,000 miles ago based on MOT mileages. I guess they're due for replacement then - although I'll look at them first to see if there's any obvious damage.

I also have a complete carb from another car which had 90k on it, but I have no idea how good it is or whether the jet and needle in that were ever replaced etc.

My question then - how do I/the garage go about adjusting the carb? I don't have a co2 meter so it'll have to be the garage realistically. I've seen a few threads online, most usefully this one:

https://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=100472

But I'm not sure if my carb is an earlier or later type, as referred to in that thread.

It looks like this:



Any comments/help/advice? From the thread above I think if the dashpot is removed the needle can be raised up and down to adjust the mixture via a special tool, is that correct?

Thanks
There is a brass 8mm nut on the underside to adjust the needle , what was the measured CO at idle ? These carbs were notorious for going rich due to several reasons , The needle and jet wore after about 25000 miles , unleaded fuel is unkind to them , the float
level would rise due to the plastic bridge piece holding the float hinge weakening , also there is a silver valve on the side with a U shaped rubber pipe on , these fail and you get massive richness on choke … they were like this way back when 240's were current , let alone now some 25 years later !

You need to replace at least the above parts and a float chamber gasket and diaphragm for good luck
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience .
Clan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 13th, 2018, 11:36   #3
Bugjam1999
Master Member
 

Last Online: Apr 26th, 2024 12:00
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: London and Cambridge
Default

Hi,

Thanks - hmmm, doesn't sounds like it'll be much fun messing about with that carb then. I don't know what the measured co2 at idle was, the wording on the failure sheet is:

Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (8.2.1.2 (b))

Which I believe refers to the fast idle test.

I wonder if the other carb is any better. Unfortunately without an emissions tester it's hard to tell without frequent trips to the garage.

Thanks
Bugjam1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 13th, 2018, 11:40   #4
Clan
Experienced Member
 
Clan's Avatar
 

Last Online: Yesterday 22:51
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bugjam1999 View Post
Hi,

Thanks - hmmm, doesn't sounds like it'll be much fun messing about with that carb then. I don't know what the measured co2 at idle was, the wording on the failure sheet is:

Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (8.2.1.2 (b))

Which I believe refers to the fast idle test.

I wonder if the other carb is any better. Unfortunately without an emissions tester it's hard to tell without frequent trips to the garage.

Thanks
you are going to have to spend Money what ever you do , best get the current carb overhauled and set up just the once to pass . It should make a big difference to fuel consumption too and sweeter running ..
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience .
Clan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Clan For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 14th, 2018, 08:29   #5
Clifford Pope
Not an expert but ...
 

Last Online: Apr 26th, 2024 12:45
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boncath
Default

It would be worth asking the garage for the detailed emission readings, at idle and at fast test. Normally they give you a separate print out, apart from the certificate or failure notification.

(By the way, it's carbon monoxide CO, not dioxide CO2. CO2 is the complete combustion product if the settings are correct, taking the CO down to the acceptable level)
Clifford Pope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 14th, 2018, 23:34   #6
Bugjam1999
Master Member
 

Last Online: Apr 26th, 2024 12:00
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: London and Cambridge
Default

Ok, I’ve dug out the paperwork and there is a specific figure given- the co (not co2, thank you) reading was 6.09% and the limit is 4.5%. There was only one set of figures given, I presume for a car this old it’s only tested at fast idle?

Anyway, since that’s significantly over the limit I imagine anything short of sending the carb away to someone who knows what they’re doing with it would be fairly futile...

So I’m going to swap it completely. I’ve got a manifold fitted with a Weber 22/34 dmtl that I bought from a forum member a little while back, it was on his b21 equipped car and was set up properly on a rolling road so hopefully it’ll bolt on and work with minimal fuss.

If I didn’t have the weber sitting there I’d put more effort into fixing the Stromberg, but in the interests of time - optimistically booked mot on Friday, car show Saturday - I’ll swap the Weber in and hope that works.

Also- from the looks of this thread others have been happy with Weber conversions to redblock engines...

https://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=155444

Cheers
Bugjam1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:45.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.