|
Information |
|
S40 T4 SE - 2001 for saleViews : 2201 Replies : 24Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Sep 20th, 2011, 23:54 | #21 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Apr 24th, 2024 21:26
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: birmingham
|
its getting better mpg on a steady run than my 1.8/auto !
__________________
940s - 2l / 92 < gone&missed s401.8 xs auto <gone >V50 2.4SE Geartronic aka "the new money pit" "skyship007 has now been successfully added to your ignore list. "." |
Sep 20th, 2011, 23:59 | #22 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Nov 15th, 2022 21:34
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London / Essex
|
Shockingly yes. Much better than my P1 1783cc one. We were lucky to get anything near 40 and that was down the hill
__________________
Current car: 2002 S40 1.9D, 1992 240SE Nullius in Verba
|
Sep 21st, 2011, 00:10 | #23 | |
Senior Member
Last Online: Mar 24th, 2015 13:53
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Farnborough
|
Quote:
__________________
Current: 07/57 C30 T5 SE Geartronic with toys Past: 01/X S40 T4 SE@162k, 94/M 460 1.8Si |
|
Sep 21st, 2011, 00:29 | #24 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 21:18
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Co. Limerick, Ireland
|
Nice and economical on a long run, especially so for a such a powerful mid sized car, but around town the mpg will drop off dramatically so try not to use the turbo unnecessarily and stay clear of congestion areas...if you can that is.
__________________
Liam... '96 854 TDI SE, '99 V70 2.5D S, '05 C70 2.0T Collection, '05 S80 2.0T SE, '15 V70 D4 SE Lux Nav. |
Sep 21st, 2011, 14:57 | #25 | |
Master Member
Last Online: Oct 26th, 2013 01:33
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
|
Quote:
Just last week I conducted a test of driving at higher RPM, in lower gear to see if it turns out more economical. You may think I'm mad but on the INSTANT readout, my MPG was always pretty decent (i.e 32mpg+ in gear 2, 2,800rpm.) So anyways, I tanked up as always but this time with just a little over 14 litres (or just over 3 gallons) The light had JUST come on, so it was the perfect test. So there I am poddling along on the second day, and surprisingly my AVERAGE MPG is showing 23-24MPG and I thought "GREAT!" Come the next day the fuel light reappears, suprised, I check my miles covered (56 miles?) and did some math as I was a little confused. I averaged 23.5mpg so 23.5 x 3.1 gallons = 72.85 miles. ?? I then worked out: 56 miles divided by 14.10 litres x 4.34 = 18mpg dead! What really ****ed me off is my average MPG readout has always been dead on accurate, I was over the moon when my average was showing 23-24mpg+ in the city but the moment I changed my driving habit, the car was some what half confused. (even though I did reset the trip computer.) Even @ 65-70 it may actually be miles off because of the change of driving style...? Who knows.
__________________
1999 S40 Silver XS 1.6 16V - SOLD! 1997 S40 Blue CD 2.0 140BHP - SOLD! 1998 S40 Black CD 2.0 140BHP - SOLD! 2002 S40 Titanium Grey 2.0T 165BHP, Sport Lux - SOLD! 2003 V40 Blue SE 1.8 122BHP - Current! |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jabe For This Useful Post: |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|