|
S40 / V40 '96-'04 General Forum for the Volvo S40 and V40 (Classic) Series from 1995-2004. |
Information |
|
Buying tips : would you buy with noisy VVT pulley ?Views : 1415 Replies : 18Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
May 28th, 2018, 20:44 | #11 |
Member
Last Online: Mar 26th, 2024 10:38
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Kalix
|
Hot air should NOT blow out of the dipstick tubing while the motor is running.
The PCV valve is a one way passage that allows the gases caused by blow-by (piston rings/valve stems) to escape into the open air/inlet manifold), to avoid pressure to build up in the crankcase. The engine in question has positive pressure in the crankcase, the important question is why. Most likely a defective PCV-valve clogged by sludge since I doubt that such a valve suffers from mechanical breakdown very often since it's most likely just a spring loaded steel ball inside a piece of tubing. Furthermore,-why is the PCV-valve clogged up? Worn piston rings? Worn valve stems? Both scenarios causes blow by. If this motor has been running in this condition for a long time the oil will have been diluted by the unburned gases and also been subject to the build up of sludge and not to mention the risk of damaged oil seals. |
May 28th, 2018, 21:20 | #12 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Yesterday 22:35
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: birmingham
|
Quote:
VVT , you will need to get a Proper quote for one + fitting it With the new cambelt/tensioner + aux belt and tensioner at the same time ,, saves on labour, belts = volvo say X years OR XX miles whichever is first = Change it , "oh but its only done 3miles on a 12year old belt - buy a new engine thinking PCV , read up more and learn how it works, rather than some random dummies internerds test with a glove Most important of all IF the car was worth buying , youd have bought it,, rather than wait, risk loosing it and ask random people "is it worth it",, and without a Price for the car,, no one can answer ,, VVT + belts + labour ran me about £350ish "some" years ago on mine, and it is going to cost me About the same again innabits for another set of belts + labour to fit em,, And possibly a vvt if that POS thing has failed AGAIN
__________________
940s - 2l / 92 < gone&missed s401.8 xs auto <gone >V50 2.4SE Geartronic aka "the new money pit" "skyship007 has now been successfully added to your ignore list. "." |
|
May 29th, 2018, 01:35 | #13 | |
Member
Last Online: Aug 1st, 2019 20:17
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Dorset
|
Quote:
HOWEVER, no one has yet pointed out that the 2000MY car your looking at isn't strictly a phase 1. It's more than likely a phase 1.5 which has a mix and match of phase 1 and 2 bits. Pure phase 1s finished at the end of 1998, and the phase 2 started in mid to late 2000. Is the car your looking at on a W or X reg? Is the seat height adjuster on the outer side of the seat like your 2001 car? If so then you may be in luck. If the adjuster is a thin lever on the inboard side of the seat, then these are phase 1 jobs. Also, phase 1's didn't have a VVT system, but the 1.5's did. Regarding the PCV, they will all blow oil out when the cap is removed which is a bit alarming, because it's being thrown up by the cams. You need to check whether it is actually blowing air out as well. Don't do the glove test, it's crap. And if it is actually sucking, the last thing you want is latex being wrapped round a camshaft. Just gently lay the cap back on without latching it. If, as you're placing the cap on, you feel a very slight pull, and/or if the cap stays there without it blowing oil out the sides, then it's fine. Regarding oil usage, they do seem to consume oil. My phase 1 car actually has a factory fitted sticker on the fuel filler cap saying: "Note: Check oil level after refuelling". I fitted a new PCV a couple years ago (because the old one was caked) which wasn't difficult or expensive to do, and did a compression test which was spot on, yet the car still uses about 500ml every 2000 miles or so. Edit: I just remembered VVT cars have a metal grate underneath the filler cap so you can't actually see the camshafts. Volvo probably realised that too many people were shoving gloves into their engine's valetrain so rectified the issue. It'll probably still throw oil past the grates though, so still just lay the cap on and see if oil comes out the sides.. or throws the cap off. Then you have an issue.
__________________
Current: 2003 VW Passat 1.9TDI, 1979 Saab 99 turbo, 1968 MGB GT, Last edited by martin93; May 29th, 2018 at 01:49. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to martin93 For This Useful Post: |
May 30th, 2018, 05:36 | #14 | |
Non Fragile
Last Online: Oct 13th, 2023 06:46
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Chadderton, Oldham
|
True.
Quote:
The PCV isn't complicated, and it doesn't even have a valve at all, it's simply a clear void between several bits of engine and the inlet manifold. The manifold sucks and draws the vapourous gases, where either condensate oil is returned by gravity to the sump or gets burned in the cylinders. |
|
Jun 13th, 2018, 23:29 | #15 |
Junior Member
Last Online: Feb 17th, 2024 00:50
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Brighton
|
The car was sold the next morning, I had told the seller I would come back in the afternoon to see it washed (because it was dusty) but another buyer showed up earlier.
Anyway, I never like to decide on the spot and in this case there were a few things that held me back. Namely, timing belt change was due so it doubled the actual cost of the car, dusty outside, not washed in a very long time, spotless inside and meticulously cleaned (therefore outside suspicious), it was a phase 1, I prefer the facelift models after 2001 and people here made me realize so many parts were changed, even the design of the rear lights was slightly altered I recently realized that despite having seen many cars and tons of pictures. I also got concerned after opening the oil filler cap, but I think that was a case of a litlle knowledge can be a dangerous thing. I don't think there was anything wrong, it was spewing oil, but mine which has the screen and definitely sucks in the glove makes small projections despite the screen and it makes the same noise. GOOD THING I DIDN T TRY THE SO-CALLED GLOVE TEST, THE GLOVE WOULD HAVE BEEN SUCKED IN , that's what it did on mine but the screen prevented the glove from being swallowed. I can imagine the ordeal and the face of the owner. I have my sights on another V40 now, somewhat higher mileage a little over 100k miles, very good condition, but the timing belt was changed at 100 k miles for the first time apparently, and it's not shown in the book which has no entry after 80K miles. Also last owner - who had it done - owned the car for 6 months, drove more than 10 k miles during that time and then it went to the used car dealer. Very strange. Trying to figure out who was that last user the last owner or the used car dealer who said it had been registered on a garage name, doesn't look good if someone bought it and sold it 6 months later after doing the timing belt. Last edited by V40addict; Jun 13th, 2018 at 23:43. |
Jun 14th, 2018, 21:08 | #16 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Mar 24th, 2024 19:47
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: S****horpe
|
There could indeed be dark reasons for a previous owner moving the car on after 6mths and having spent money on it-say an impending big ticket item or a perception of such.However there are many legitimate reasons for doing so also.Arrival of a company car,need of something physically bigger/smaller,needing something more economical for a longer commute to work than previously was the case to name just a few.If you're genuinely interested go have a look/test drive,if necessary take someone with you who may be slightly more objective on the matter.Then go from there,be prepared to walk away if you're unsatisfied.
|
Jun 17th, 2018, 01:43 | #17 |
Junior Member
Last Online: Feb 17th, 2024 00:50
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Brighton
|
OK I got more info from the used car dealer, good news is that the belt was changed by another car trader before resale to last owner. Bad news is the dealer forwarded me the history he got from the address of a taxi company. So it looks like the CAR WAS USED AS A TAXI (will check with the seller). I guess it's a deal breaker as such use is very taxing on just about every part of the car, and at the minimum it would be due for a visit to a garage for a big maintenance . Which would also explain the price which is about 20% lower than most V40 of simialr condition and mileage.
|
Jun 17th, 2018, 16:42 | #18 |
Ancient
Last Online: Mar 13th, 2024 21:20
Join Date: May 2012
Location: chesterfield
|
If you know the reg number, check on the mot history checker ! https://www.check-mot.service.gov.uk/
Not only can you see the mot history, but you can check that the mileage goes up steadily, if the mileage readings go down at any point, it may have been clocked ! The mileage does seem rather low if it's been used as a taxi ? A mate of mine is a taxi driver/ owner & does about 60K a year |
Jun 22nd, 2018, 09:02 | #19 |
Always listen & learn!
Last Online: Mar 13th, 2023 20:32
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Winchester + Malaga
|
My VVT has been "rattling" for nigh on 18 months, I've had a new VVT for nearly 12 months. I can't be arsed to put it on and I haven't noticed any reduction in performance or fuel consumption!
__________________
264 V8 5.0L V40 BiFuel, she's gone, she's dead......Oh well! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|