|
PV, 120 (Amazon), 1800 General Forum for the Volvo PV, 120 and 1800 cars |
Information |
|
Paul & Stephanie Rowlands 64 P1800 (Project Saint Marie)Views : 13642 Replies : 63Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Aug 24th, 2011, 03:29 | #21 |
Master Member
Last Online: Nov 29th, 2021 23:46
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dunedin
|
I am pretty much straddling the line with respect to this. My current toy car is a Ruddspeed Jensen built P1800, and I would never consider going the route you have here with that. I would look at buying a late 1800S or (providing you could get rid of the horrible ‘wooden’ dash) a 1800E to bring up to modern standards. I also wouldn’t be looking at starting with a show quality one, but one that was in need of work anyway.
I have recently been thinking of going the MkII Jag route from here: http://www.beacham-jaguar.co.nz so this thread is coming at a good time for me, as I love my P1800. I do drive it almost every day, and I agree with 940 that they are a very capable car. I just want a little bit more. I wouldn’t do any body mods at all except fit cow-horns and hock-stick chrome, as the thing I love most about the 1800 is the looks. I don’t see any benefit in changing that at all. I live in a nice harbour side village (in UK speak), which is 25 minutes down a good quality winding road with a speed limit that’s hard to reach. It’s a lovely drive, but the B18 just doesn’t have the get up and go to make it an exciting drive. My wife’s 7-seater makes more of a go at it (although, that does have a modified VR6 in it). Anyway, I’ve rambled off topic. I was trying to sa y that I agree with 940 when it’s a rare or special car. If it’s just one of several tens of thousand off the production line, then I think it’s a good thing to keep it on the road by whatever means necessary. |
Aug 24th, 2011, 04:24 | #22 |
Trader
Last Online: Aug 1st, 2014 05:07
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Madill
|
Oh, I would be the first to agree about not altering historical cars or rare models.. I wouldnt have done the Camaro build pictured ealier, if it was a rare DZ 302 Z28.. But, that isnt really what he was stating at all, or that isnt what I read.
As far as the common, non historical or sought after models, I really dont see what the problem is with bringing them up to modern efficiencies.. It actually brings more awareness to the fact the P1800 and Amazon exist.. My Project Changling build yeilds numerous emails a week from people that didnt know the P1800 existed, and now are looking for one.. If we can get the awareness and appreciation up on these models, then there will be more support for the parts necessary to keep even the original car on the road. I think it is a silly debate when it comes to the fact about possible improvement on the P1800/Amazons performance and driving habits. Fact is, there can be improvement, but it is subjective to the type of car you are wanting.. It just seems that the purist tend to be less respectful to the other styles.. I dont really see to many threads where people have to chime on on original build, and say that is just horrible.. How dare you not fix the deficiencies? There just seems to be an intentional disrespectful tone and lack tolerance to anothers likes, while they are trying to communicate their counter views.. All these items are direct bolt on, and the customer can save all their original parts that can be installed again at anytime.. Swedish Skunk Werks goes out of their way to offer products that involve NO BODY ALTERATIONS, you unbolt the original parts, and bolt our parts in.. I dont think that is blastphomy at all, it is far far better that the Race Car alterations done to these cars.
__________________
Robert Jackson Classic Auto Glass Innovations Flush Mount Glass Classicautoglassinnovations.com Last edited by Iamtheonlyreal1; Aug 24th, 2011 at 04:31. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Iamtheonlyreal1 For This Useful Post: |
Aug 24th, 2011, 04:28 | #23 |
Senior Member
Last Online: Jan 10th, 2024 20:21
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
|
I think the main point Peter (940 Turbo) is trying to make is that the Amazon in its normal configuration has won plenty of races without these new extra components. John Parker has plenty of experience and he holds the Historic A track record at Watkins Glen. That was 20 years ago and no one has beat it yet! The front suspension doesn't need to be updated to make this car better. Some mods are allowed but this doesn't mean completely changing the car.
As with old American cars, they were only good for racing the 1/4 mile. These kinds of upgrades would be needed for American cars, but no really for Volvos. The cars in the videos look cool, but they don't handle nearly are well as AC "Shelby" Cobras and Sunbeam Tigers. Those cars were made for racing and actually I could buy one for about the same price as your build. In the future though, I probably still buy your AC unit and the rear axle. The biggest thing I see with the car, is the price. When the car is finished, the only true part that is still Volvo, is the body. Just wondering how much lighter is the Amazon going to be when it is finished? The thing I like about the Amazon is simplicity. There is more room in the engine bay and less electronics to mess with. Will your new Amazon have OBDII support? Also, how easy is it to tune the engine? If performance is your goal and you want something special, the Zcars Mini Cooper Hayabusa kit is a great deal. For $25K american, you could build a turbo hayabusa car with over 400HP and 0-60 acceleration in under 3 sec. This car is a beast and it will be my next build: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnvxP...ayer_embedded#! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZb9h...el_video_title He goes on to win.
__________________
1959 Volvo Amazon. Chassis #17048 |
Aug 24th, 2011, 04:47 | #24 | |
Trader
Last Online: Aug 1st, 2014 05:07
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Madill
|
Quote:
2nd Point.. Yes, there are alot of fun modded cars to drive, like the Hyabusa Mini. But with those type builds, we are not talking daily drivers with all the modern conveniences and driver friendly characteristics. Cars that can be driven cross country, with dependability, comfort, and effiency.. 3rd point.. People are afraid of modern technology, but the OBDII system is highly supported and very easy to tune.. Infact, there is plenty of programming, knowledge, and support available to get exactly what you want the first time.. It is way easier that messing with Dual Carbs, Timing Advance Curves, and finicky air/fuel mixture setting that seem to change all the time. Set it once with an OBDII and it is there.. You can hit the key, it starts the first with no warm ups, chokes, tempermental carb issues, etc... Now I am not bashing the original car, in its day it has done quite well.. It has a very devoted following, and a great group of people that have been supporting them over the years. Everyone has their driving needs and preference, and I am not saying I dont enjoy a nice original classic car, because I do.. I have had original MGA's, Triumph TR250's and TR6's, Early Porsche's, Ferrari Testarossa, etc, and there is a time when they are fun to drive, and that was exactly what I was looking for at the time.. I have also had new cars, that I had done the Aftermarket add on's and performance mods, so there is always room for improvement in the New or Old, just depends on Owner preference..
__________________
Robert Jackson Classic Auto Glass Innovations Flush Mount Glass Classicautoglassinnovations.com Last edited by Iamtheonlyreal1; Aug 24th, 2011 at 05:33. |
|
Aug 24th, 2011, 10:10 | #25 | |
.
Last Online: Jul 14th, 2013 14:28
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MK
|
Quote:
Other traders are required to ask permission from the moderators of the site before peddling their wares, something you appear to have decided doesn't apply to you. Right now all we have is a load of boasts, some completely untried products and some cars that have been taken apart but not put together again. You simply can't compare something like a Camaro with an 1800 or 120. The Volvo is a proper monocoque, the Camaro is not. I’m not against modification per se; I’ve built enough rally cars not to want to beat that particular drum. However I think your approach is crude and insensitive. Why impose a whole load of modern components on an old car? Look at cars that were modified in the past. Engines that were then new and interesting are now old and obsolete. By and large those cars are just not interesting to modern eyes. A few years from now an LS1 will be just another old and obsolete engine and these cars will be an anachronism. No one now wants a Stag with a Rover V8, an NSU RO 80 with a Ford V4 engine, or MG TC with a Volvo B18. These cars won’t be as good as an MX5, Lotus Elise, Porsche 944, Mercedes E55, Volvo T5R etc etc etc. If someone wants an 1800 style car with rack and pinion it makes far more financial sense to go out and buy a Porsche 944 than to hack and 1800 around. As I said before it is the owner’s car. But the idea that by simply bolting a load of modern stuff to an old car you’ll somehow per definition create something vastly better should be challenged. History tends to suggest these efforts won’t have enduring appeal. Experience tells us that the original engineers were highly competent and that when the cars are in good condition they work exceptionally well. It’ll be far more cost effective to rebuild what there is, and I’d suggest the end result will have more enduring appeal, more historic significance and greater commercial value |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 940_Turbo For This Useful Post: |
Aug 24th, 2011, 11:05 | #26 | |
Junior Member
Last Online: Jun 1st, 2016 14:42
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dublin
|
Quote:
The 1800list has already had to endure a stream of product promotion from the same source, and any criticism of the same is met with nonsense about anal 'purists' and a 'silent majority' emailing through their support for his venture. I've no problem with people transplanting whatever they like onto their old cars, nor with anyone fabricating new bits for old cars, but pitching the same in the manner that's happened here is just irritating. The corvette/mustang/grab-bag with a 1800 body might be a great thing altogether, but it'll be undoubtedly inferior to what you can buy for the same money - if prepared to forego the veneer of 60's styling. The pretence that a well-sorted, broadly original 1800 or Amazon can't really cut the mustard in contemporary driving lies at the heart of the pitch here - and that's patently guff. So spare me the 'purist' evasion when people (real people - not a 'silent majority') voice concern at a wall of product placement, or comically large wheels, or the suggestion that existing Volvo specialist suppliers aren't really up to the job, or that some sort of product/stress testing for a suite of new components in the context of these cars might be a good idea, or indeed that those who disagree with your approach are 'unintelligent'. Respect runs both ways. |
|
Aug 24th, 2011, 15:17 | #27 | |
Trader
Last Online: Aug 1st, 2014 05:07
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Madill
|
Quote:
I dont discount anyone's opinion, but you dont have to read between the lines to see dis-respect in these statements.. What you are not considering is, you are completely dis-respecting people that have the alternative build view, and they are fellow members on here.. If your intent is to insult me, why not make a personal post, instead of disrespecting other members on here that have some of the same ideas.
__________________
Robert Jackson Classic Auto Glass Innovations Flush Mount Glass Classicautoglassinnovations.com Last edited by Iamtheonlyreal1; Aug 24th, 2011 at 15:20. |
|
Aug 24th, 2011, 15:36 | #28 |
Trader
Last Online: Aug 1st, 2014 05:07
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Madill
|
[QUOTE=alastair;971676]+1
The 1800list has already had to endure a stream of product promotion from the same source, and any criticism of the same is met with nonsense about anal 'purists' and a 'silent majority' emailing through their support for his venture. Again, No need to read the post if it isnt something you are interested in. Why do you think all these products are coming out? Could it be because they are requested by the (Silent Majority) or interested members? Business is business in the end, and if the interest and dialogue from Volvo owners and members of these groups werent there, none of it would happen. I've no problem with people transplanting whatever they like onto their old cars, nor with anyone fabricating new bits for old cars, but pitching the same in the manner that's happened here is just irritating. The corvette/mustang/grab-bag with a 1800 body might be a great thing altogether, but it'll be undoubtedly inferior to what you can buy for the same money - if prepared to forego the veneer of 60's styling. The pretence that a well-sorted, broadly original 1800 or Amazon can't really cut the mustard in contemporary driving lies at the heart of the pitch here - and that's patently guff. So spare me the 'purist' evasion when people (real people - not a 'silent majority') voice concern at a wall of product placement, or comically large wheels, or the suggestion that existing Volvo specialist suppliers aren't really up to the job, or that some sort of product/stress testing for a suite of new components in the context of these cars might be a good idea, or indeed that those who disagree with your approach are 'unintelligent'. Respect runs both ways Not saying that anyone lacks intelligence because they disagree with me or others.. Just saying the lack of intelligence kicks in, when it is in the form of the statements above by 940. Not saying the original Volvo isnt capable, and you can get a bit more out of the original configuration. Just saying that there is more out there after that, so I am sorry if that statment is offensive.. I dont know what I said that is an insult, just the facts that there is always room for improvement. And if you are comparing apples to apples, and apple will always win when being compared.. I am taking the Volvo out of the Apple category, where it can compete somewhere else on a higher level.
__________________
Robert Jackson Classic Auto Glass Innovations Flush Mount Glass Classicautoglassinnovations.com |
Aug 24th, 2011, 15:57 | #29 | |
Trader
Last Online: Aug 1st, 2014 05:07
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Madill
|
Quote:
__________________
Robert Jackson Classic Auto Glass Innovations Flush Mount Glass Classicautoglassinnovations.com Last edited by Iamtheonlyreal1; Aug 24th, 2011 at 16:00. |
|
Aug 24th, 2011, 16:09 | #30 |
Trader
Last Online: Aug 1st, 2014 05:07
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Madill
|
Now here is the real point I was trying to make, when it came to the lack of class.. This is a build thread of Paul Rowlands build for his wife, and is a documentation of what is going on. Mr. Rowlands thought enough of this type build, has sought out this type build, had came and visited our facility and process before he decided to commit.
I have had several people drive from cross country to take a look at our products, and we have a waiting list for P1800's and Amazon's. I have an even larger waiting list for parts as they come available, and these people I have met personally or have had lengthy conversations via phone, email, etc, so perhaps their decisions are a bit more informed than you give credit... If you want to bash products, or start a run away discussion, why not leave to the other post I have about said products? Why insult a fellow Volvo Owner for his decision, and taint his build record, by insensitive statements? I am not saying questions or constructive critism isnt welcome, but I think the Tone and Insult of a couple of statements posted are very loud and clear.
__________________
Robert Jackson Classic Auto Glass Innovations Flush Mount Glass Classicautoglassinnovations.com Last edited by Iamtheonlyreal1; Aug 24th, 2011 at 16:12. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|