Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > C30 / S40 & V50 '04-'12 / C70 '06-'13 General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

C30 / S40 & V50 '04-'12 / C70 '06-'13 General Forum for the P1-platform C30 / S40 / V50 / C70 models

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

2013 V40 Pricelist

Views : 1961

Replies : 29

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Apr 12th, 2012, 01:36   #21
volvorocks
Rodney
 
volvorocks's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 4th, 2016 05:02
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On The Street
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thom12 View Post
Will they bring out a saloon version? i.e. a new S40?

I think it would be sad for this to be the end of the S40 ...

I plan on changing my car by the end of the year and right now it's between a C-Class and the S80. I know they are completely different cars but i like both.

I think the V40 looks great but it has a striking similarity to the Focus and one of the new Hyudais, not sure which one it is though.
i30?...and the i30 is half the price and probably more reliable and better built?...along with a better warranty



Regards

Last edited by volvorocks; Apr 12th, 2012 at 01:39.
volvorocks is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to volvorocks For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 12th, 2012, 02:35   #22
SonyVaio
VOC Member
 
SonyVaio's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 26th, 2016 19:58
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Exmouth
Default

The i30 certainly doesn't boast the features that the V40 has but they do look like they they could have come from the same drawing board. Although they do sit on completely different platforms.



Attached Images
File Type: jpg NewV40-i30.JPG (54.9 KB, 12 views)
SonyVaio is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SonyVaio For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 12th, 2012, 04:19   #23
volvorocks
Rodney
 
volvorocks's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 4th, 2016 05:02
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On The Street
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SonyVaio View Post
The i30 certainly doesn't boast the features that the V40 has but they do look like they they could have come from the same drawing board. Although they do sit on completely different platforms.



Agree....although.....

16k i30
26k v40


....??????????????????

Regards
volvorocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12th, 2012, 12:13   #24
tayandre
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Jun 25th, 2013 21:37
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kilmarnock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SonyVaio View Post
Theoretically with the way the PowerShift box works with its dual wet clutches and smooth constant power delivery it should be every bit as economical as the manual.

With one clutch working 1,3,5 and revese and the other working gears 2,4 and 6, as the car accelerates in 1stgear, second is already at the ready and as clutch one disengages clutch two engages with the new gear. This offers the seamless transfer from one gear to the next and you have not got the excess revving/changes thus saving in on fuel that a normal auto box would waste.

They reckon you loose about 6% in efficiency with wet clutches vs manual. They slip by design so will always be less efficient than a dry clutch. If you look at VW/Audi DSG it's the same, wet clutch version is thirstier/slower/dirtier and 7-speed dry clutch is faster/more economical/ cleaner than a manual.

I can see that on my car, if you do 80ish on the m-way economy will be high 30s/low 40s. Slowing down by 5 mph results in a 5-10 MPG improvement, the cause is the wet clutch that's slipping away power the higher the speed goes.
__________________
2009 C30 2.0D Powershift
tayandre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12th, 2012, 12:20   #25
tayandre
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Jun 25th, 2013 21:37
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kilmarnock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by volvorocks View Post
i30?...and the i30 is half the price and probably more reliable and better built?...along with a better warranty


Yeah it does look kinda similar, agree with you on warranty, build, etc. However, desirability is the big deciding factor and no, a Hyundai doesn't do it for me. Certainly I agree it's the logical choice and probably a better product pound for pound but I just couldn't.

A very good example of quality vs grade.
__________________
2009 C30 2.0D Powershift
tayandre is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tayandre For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 12th, 2012, 12:45   #26
SonyVaio
VOC Member
 
SonyVaio's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 26th, 2016 19:58
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Exmouth
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by volvorocks View Post
Agree....although.....

16k i30
26k v40


....??????????????????

Regards
It is just the same as you can get a Skoda to look like an VW/Audi (Octavia) but it will never actually be a VW/Audi - although Skoda is a cracking car these days - even classed as luxury cars in China.

You get what you pay for, do you really think you'll be 10k happier in the i30 with build, feel and toys?? My money would still be on the Volvo in this particular instance.

SonyVaio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12th, 2012, 12:50   #27
SonyVaio
VOC Member
 
SonyVaio's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 26th, 2016 19:58
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Exmouth
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tayandre View Post
They reckon you loose about 6% in efficiency with wet clutches vs manual. They slip by design so will always be less efficient than a dry clutch. If you look at VW/Audi DSG it's the same, wet clutch version is thirstier/slower/dirtier and 7-speed dry clutch is faster/more economical/ cleaner than a manual.

I can see that on my car, if you do 80ish on the m-way economy will be high 30s/low 40s. Slowing down by 5 mph results in a 5-10 MPG improvement, the cause is the wet clutch that's slipping away power the higher the speed goes.
I agree.

Although Volvo have put ina a great deal of time, money and effort to increase the efficiency of its PowerShift and it is not just a clone. An article I read just the other day was all about the Volvo powershift being similar to the early powershift types of other manufacturers but with far better efficency and performance.

SonyVaio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12th, 2012, 13:05   #28
Volvorforlife
Master Member
 

Last Online: Mar 18th, 2013 19:20
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Midlands
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SonyVaio View Post
It is just the same as you can get a Skoda to look like an VW/Audi (Octavia) but it will never actually be a VW/Audi - although Skoda is a cracking car these days - even classed as luxury cars in China.

You get what you pay for, do you really think you'll be 10k happier in the i30 with build, feel and toys?? My money would still be on the Volvo in this particular instance.

The Seat Toledo is an old Audi A4 Same quality as the Audi was 7 years ago but behind what they are like now.

I have driven a Scoda Superb and it was a lovely car to drive with great build. Just not a fan of the interior but that's because I love Volvo interiors even if the C30 lacks in build quality.
__________________
11reg C30 2.0 R-design
12reg VW Touareg 3.0Tdi Escape
62reg C30 T5 R-design
62reg Land Rover Discovery 4 HSE
Volvorforlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12th, 2012, 14:00   #29
tayandre
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Jun 25th, 2013 21:37
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kilmarnock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SonyVaio View Post
Volvo powershift being similar to the early powershift types of other manufacturers but with far better efficency and performance.

If you look at the S/V60 yeah they have kept MPG and CO2 the same as the manual but at the expense of performance, 0-62 takes almost two seconds more. All the other Powershift Volvo's, mine included, are slower/thirstier/dirtier than a manual and by quite a bit.

An example of effieciency gains are VWs 7-speed DSG and BMW and Merc 7 and 8 speed conventional autos. Those acheive improvments in economy, CO2 and performance over a 6-speed manual rather than being the expense of one of them.

I'm sure I could make my car more ecomical and lower CO2 if I go slower, that's all Volvo have done on the S/V60 D2.
__________________
2009 C30 2.0D Powershift
tayandre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14th, 2012, 17:02   #30
colinstone
New Member
 

Last Online: May 2nd, 2012 14:26
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oxford
Default

Luggage space is pretty small - 335/1032 - which less than 2011 BMW 1 series at 360/1200. D2 SE vs 116d ED to same spec is marginally cheaper - £24295/£24685 (but good BMW military discount of £3.5k to come off) but will be stung by exorbitant servicing costs - at least BMW do 5yrs for £300, so that all dealer s/h cars have a full history. At £60 a year it is not worth getting DIY fingers dirty!!
Blond leather interior has gone the cheap route of just seats and door cards - carpets/dash remain dark.

Runout V50 with 20% off was a steal!!

Ho hum.
colinstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:20.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.