|
PV, 120 (Amazon), 1800 General Forum for the Volvo PV, 120 and 1800 cars |
Information |
|
Paul & Stephanie Rowlands 64 P1800 (Project Saint Marie)Views : 13718 Replies : 63Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Aug 23rd, 2011, 00:39 | #11 |
VOC Member
Last Online: Today 12:43
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chatham
|
I could certainly never afford anything remotely close to the budget for this car. $90k could put several dream cars in my garage. Having a suitable garage would have to be a first priority!
If I was thinking about it I'd want to know that the changes to it would allow it to be driven hard for a few hundred miles in a day across some pretty rugged roads, something that a well maintained standard 1800 can take in its stride. The rear suspension rods and Panhard look neat but the bushings looked as if the compliance factors would be pretty uncompromising. NVH was a very inexact science when the 1800 and Amazon came out but the rubber bushings were adequate for fast touring on poor roads. Even standard sized modern poly bushings have negatives in the NVH department. Perhaps the owner of this car can put 20k miles on it by this time next year and report back. Notes from a fast trip to New York and back via New Orleans would make interesting reading. |
Aug 23rd, 2011, 01:41 | #12 |
Master Member
Last Online: Nov 29th, 2021 23:46
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dunedin
|
About the price. USD60K is about NZD73K at the moment. My Audi cost NZD75K, so its about the same (not counting car purchase price and shipping etc). This isn't silly money for a new premium car in my opinion.
Then again, as Mitch says, I feel confindent paying that money to Audi, not so much to 'some random guy on the internet'. I need to see all the details and read end user reviews first. Thats why this thread is so interesting to me. A question though. Are you looking at doing a right hand driver version? |
Aug 23rd, 2011, 02:11 | #13 | |
Trader
Last Online: Aug 1st, 2014 05:07
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Madill
|
Quote:
And yes, we can do right hand drive, if we are supplied a car... Our front end system is Right Hand Drive friendly, so there is no issue at all.. Here are a few pictures of one of my previous builds, that was used to develope and market product... Here is a 1968 Pro-Touring Camaro that was built to market my other company's (Classic Auto Glass Innovations) Flush Mount Glass Products.... Full Custom Suspension, 500 horsepower LS6, t56 6-speed, Multiple and subtle body mods, Flush Mount Glass Kit, etc, etc... This is a complete build from a 20 year Pasture car, in an 18 week period of time. All the work was done by me, with the exception of final paint and seat covering.. I did all the design, metal working, wiring, drivetrain, suspension, brakes, steering, accessories, etc, etc. But, I am now working out a system that will allow the quality and multi build capability of the Volvo's. The Camaro was a bit easier, due to the availability of parts, and this is what I am trying to achieve with the Volvo P1800's and Amazon's by partnering up with company's I have product experience with... I am working to offer the necessary parts to achieve a quality build in a reasonable time frame, whether it be by Swedish Skunk Werks build shop, or someone purchasing from the catalog.
__________________
Robert Jackson Classic Auto Glass Innovations Flush Mount Glass Classicautoglassinnovations.com Last edited by Iamtheonlyreal1; Aug 23rd, 2011 at 02:31. |
|
Aug 23rd, 2011, 02:17 | #14 |
Trader
Last Online: Aug 1st, 2014 05:07
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Madill
|
Here are some of the wrap up and completed pictures..
__________________
Robert Jackson Classic Auto Glass Innovations Flush Mount Glass Classicautoglassinnovations.com |
Aug 23rd, 2011, 22:02 | #15 |
foot in mouth specialist
Last Online: Sep 6th, 2016 22:55
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
|
the camaro looks pretty smart, and i for one am interested to see a complete hotrod build out of a p1800 (ala overhauling $$$). these and the amo's are prime targets for this sort of work... i think once people see the build from start to finish and the final build, confidence will be built.
good luck with your venture, Robert, i hope this turns into an enduring business, where we can call on you to help us modify our cars to our taste... PS: how are those 17" steelies coming on btw? still waiting.. |
Aug 23rd, 2011, 23:45 | #16 |
.
Last Online: Jul 14th, 2013 14:28
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MK
|
It’s interesting this, as Mitch has pointed out there is a revised supposedly better front suspension. But just what constitutes “better”. So far it is untried and untested.
The real question is why? To me an old car is about stepping back in time. Stuffing in an LS1, big modern wheels, sticky tyres and a steering rack won’t get it up to the standard of a modern car. The reality is that if that’s what you want a few grand will buy you a Mercedes E55 AMG. It’ll eat a modified old car for breakfast and you’ll step out of it fresh as a daisy for dinner in Monaco. It was built by real engineers, tried, tested and sorted. The reality is also that obeying the speed limits a well sorted 122S will arrive at about the same time. Drive your classic, see the world from the perspective of 40 years ago. A perfectly standard 122S or P1800 will cruise down to Monaco without turning a hair. People are swapping SUs for fuel injection because SUs are unreliable. In point of fact you don’t need fuel injection; you need a mechanic who isn’t brain dead. The whole resto mod thing is a form of vandalism. Do we “correct” old paintings because we can do the perspective better? Stick Formica on the Chippendale because it isn’t resistant to hot pans? Old cars are fun, too much fun to ignorantly screw them up by trying to impose arbitrary modern standards on them. |
Aug 24th, 2011, 00:15 | #17 | |
Trader
Last Online: Aug 1st, 2014 05:07
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Madill
|
Quote:
There is a big difference between Resto-Mod and Pro-Touring.. Sure you can stick a V8 in a tired old 40 year old car, along with sticking some wheels on it, but that is not even close to the same thing that is going on here.. You have to understand, here in the states, we have the 60's heavy American cars hanging on the track with the exotics in braking, cornering, acceleration, etc, and these are daily driver cars, so your analysis of the whole project is Way Off... I know this isnt the style or norm for alot of people, and I expect the critism, but please educate yourself on what Pro-Touring actually means. It is a classic shell with Modern Performance in power, braking and ride.. This type of build is not a strictly a track car, it has all the modern conveniences and comforts of the modern cars, so the are daily drivers in every respect of the word. They are very dependable and servicable and are made to be abused on the tracks or the daily commute in bumper to bumper traffic. So you do step out fresh as a daisy in what ever driving situation you are in.. As far as tested and abused.. All the components used in our product and builds have years, if not decades of track time and driver road time on them.. We are using quality and tested components from top suppliers, who do have the engineering and testing time behind them.. So please hold back on that one a bit.. This isnt re-inventing the wheel, this is bringing some of the best products out there, and giving it a home in the Volvo platform...
__________________
Robert Jackson Classic Auto Glass Innovations Flush Mount Glass Classicautoglassinnovations.com Last edited by Iamtheonlyreal1; Aug 24th, 2011 at 00:27. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Iamtheonlyreal1 For This Useful Post: |
Aug 24th, 2011, 00:57 | #18 |
.
Last Online: Jul 14th, 2013 14:28
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MK
|
I know exactly what it means. That Camaro you posted looks horrible, ugly wheels, ugly interior and a general lack of taste.
Of course it comes down to personal preference and taste, or lack thereof. Ultimately it's the owner's car and the owner's property and they're perfectly entitled to do with it as they please. However it isn't as you put it "a programmed response". It is a perfectly well reasoned point of view. As I said earlier these cars are a form of vandalism. People get all het up about cars getting destroyed in banger racing, but these monstrosities are just as irretrievably ruined as a car that get a final fling on the banger track. I guess rednecks have to drive something too, but let's drop the pretence that this has even a nodding acquaintance with competent restoration. Last edited by 940_Turbo; Aug 24th, 2011 at 01:30. |
Aug 24th, 2011, 01:47 | #19 | |
Trader
Last Online: Aug 1st, 2014 05:07
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Madill
|
Quote:
__________________
Robert Jackson Classic Auto Glass Innovations Flush Mount Glass Classicautoglassinnovations.com |
|
Aug 24th, 2011, 01:52 | #20 |
Trader
Last Online: Aug 1st, 2014 05:07
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Madill
|
Here are a couple of video's of the Redneck engineering as stated by 940Turbo. These are 1st Gen Camaro's which had no factory capability of road coursing, and were generally used for straight 1/4 mile cars. Now, some of these cars act as daily drivers, but get road hard on the weekends..
Our cars are using the same tested and abused components that these cars feature, and we are shaving about 800 pounds off the 1st gen Camaro's that were lightened up. This first 2 video is what the Pro-Touring Classic are competing against, and I believe you will see an AMG or to.. ha ha And the 4th video is of a 1st gen Camaro that beat them all in the overall scoring, set up as a daily driver.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Be72NzLgqE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvLt4cN7_9E http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOle0...eature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sAkJ6q9G8w
__________________
Robert Jackson Classic Auto Glass Innovations Flush Mount Glass Classicautoglassinnovations.com Last edited by Iamtheonlyreal1; Aug 24th, 2011 at 02:34. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|