Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > C30 / S40 & V50 '04-'12 / C70 '06-'13 General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

C30 / S40 & V50 '04-'12 / C70 '06-'13 General Forum for the P1-platform C30 / S40 / V50 / C70 models

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

V50 rear negative camber

Views : 908

Replies : 20

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Apr 12th, 2019, 19:25   #11
rowdy
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Jan 10th, 2024 06:10
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: West Sussex
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IainG View Post
Hi
Since running pressures at 38 psi all round (fairly sure it is now the reccomended pressure) the tyre wear has been very even across the whole tread.

Iain
Hi Iain, yes I understand how and why the tread wear would be more even, I was wondering if you've found upping the pressure has increased tyre life or if it just means the centre of the tread is wearing at an increased rate more inline with that of the inner tread of the tyre?
rowdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14th, 2019, 07:22   #12
IainG
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Today 05:46
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Plymouth
Default

Hi

Quote:
Hi Iain, yes I understand how and why the tread wear would be more even, I was wondering if you've found upping the pressure has increased tyre life or if it just means the centre of the tread is wearing at an increased rate more inline with that of the inner tread of the tyre?
Not sure how to know that. The tyres now wear evenly so would imagine they last longer. Previously they would have to be changed when the inner edge was worn down. The centre and outer still had pleanty of tread left. Now they wear evenly so therefore must last longer.
I am on 17" rims and the ride comfort is still good.
Iain
IainG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14th, 2019, 08:48   #13
rowdy
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Jan 10th, 2024 06:10
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: West Sussex
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IainG View Post
Hi



Not sure how to know that. The tyres now wear evenly so would imagine they last longer. Previously they would have to be changed when the inner edge was worn down. The centre and outer still had pleanty of tread left. Now they wear evenly so therefore must last longer.
I am on 17" rims and the ride comfort is still good.
Iain
I guess if you've been running those pressures for a while and weren't really interested in tyre longevity it would be difficult to know. It just interests me as I said earlier high pressure usually increases centre tread tyre wear but it's definitely something I will be trying.

As a bit of a gauge, FWD cars usually wear front tyres a lot quicker than rear tyres (at least all the ones I've had) but whenever I've had front tyres changed I've always been advised the rear tyres are close to being worn out at the same time due to the excessive inner edge wear.
I've done about 80,000mls in my car, and have so far replaced about 28 tyres. Two unnecessary due to new wheel size and a few puncture/pothole damage, but a lot of them due to high rear tyre wear rate (and I have had 4 wheel alignment checked)
rowdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14th, 2019, 11:00   #14
Cornish Expat
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Jul 5th, 2023 21:11
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Lybster
Default

That would explain why the garage always inflate new tyres way above what’s stated in the manual. Who knew national tyres were Volvo experts! Best go and put that air back in.
Cornish Expat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14th, 2019, 18:51   #15
barrybritcher
Flaccid Member
 

Last Online: Apr 15th, 2024 16:09
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norwich
Default

this is ironic. I was literally yesterday following a v50 thinking it had nutty negative camber at the rear!
__________________
2001 Volvo S60 T5 SE 2.3 Geartronic (Scrapped)
2007 Volvo S60 T5 SE 2.4 Geartronic (Sold)
2008 Volvo V70 D5 SE Sport Geartronic (Current)
barrybritcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14th, 2019, 19:04   #16
rowdy
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Jan 10th, 2024 06:10
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: West Sussex
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrybritcher View Post
this is ironic. I was literally yesterday following a v50 thinking it had nutty negative camber at the rear!
Yeh . . That's just the way we roll dude
rowdy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rowdy For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 15th, 2019, 12:36   #17
rowdy
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Jan 10th, 2024 06:10
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: West Sussex
Default

Measured the distance between ground and top of wheelarch earlier, at 675mm. I did have maybe 5kg of tools in the boot, but no dog guard or parcel shelf.quite a way off the distance measured for the t5 AWD earlier in the thread, if that helps.
rowdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15th, 2019, 14:15   #18
LizardOfBodom
WowIcanwriteAnythingHere!
 
LizardOfBodom's Avatar
 

Last Online: Mar 26th, 2024 16:05
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Dublin/Meath
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rowdy View Post
Measured the distance between ground and top of wheelarch earlier, at 675mm. I did have maybe 5kg of tools in the boot, but no dog guard or parcel shelf.quite a way off the distance measured for the t5 AWD earlier in the thread, if that helps.
I feel pointed out and probably offended, sir!....
(but jokes aside damn, thats over 50mm difference... im high, and in the wrong way :P...)
__________________
2005 V50 T5AWD M66, Stage1 Hilton tune
E-focus torque mount, E46 bi-xenon retrofit v2 , (also available in PDF form), DTSC fully-off mod, Brembo discs+ATE ceramic pads
LizardOfBodom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15th, 2019, 17:27   #19
rowdy
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Jan 10th, 2024 06:10
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: West Sussex
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LizardOfBodom View Post
I feel pointed out and probably offended, sir!....
(but jokes aside damn, thats over 50mm difference... im high, and in the wrong way :P...)
Good, you top of the range snob
I am on 120k, and thinking about changing the rear shocks for some bilsteins, so if it's dropped a bit I don't know, but not by 2"

It's not unusual for your car to be higher off the ground than lower spec, 2wd model. Different car I know, but I have an Impreza WRX, and know for sure they are 25mm higher than the sport/GX model.
rowdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15th, 2019, 19:56   #20
volvopilot
Member
 

Last Online: Feb 5th, 2024 21:38
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: north
Default

my rear end has a 2 degree camber angle.

I run them on 38-40 PSI and I have very even wear on the tyres. Running on low pressure will result in uneven wear. So recommended to run them on quite high pressure, depending on the tyres too.
volvopilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:48.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.