Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "General Topics" > General Volvo and Motoring Discussions
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

General Volvo and Motoring Discussions This forum is for messages of a general nature about Volvos that are not covered by other forums and other motoring related matters of interest. Users will need to register to post/reply.

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

MOT Procedural Question

Views : 1613

Replies : 26

Users Viewing This Thread :  

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old Feb 27th, 2019, 10:44   #1
Spike56
Master Member
 

Last Online: Today 01:54
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Orpington
Default MOT Procedural Question

Took my car in for the MOT test (Volvo dealership). Had the 'phone call that it was passed with only comment that windscreen wiper blades were leaving smears. Had those changed. Received the pass certificate, paid the bill and left. Got home checked the paperwork, all the items were 'green' except the wipers. All good so far.

Went online to the DVLA MOT webpage and it shows MOT failed for 'major defects'. It also shows the pass thereafter.

According to the fail the headlamp beams were too high!

Given that the headlamps are electrically 'lowerable' and a simple twist of the dial would have lowered said beam, does it not seem churlish to fail it. Or is the 'beam' different to the focal point? Also should there not be a failure certificate issued also? And lastly how does the angle of a light constitute a 'major defect' ??

I don't NEED an answer, but this has set off the grumpy old man in me once again!

Thoughts?
Spike56 is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.