|
General Volvo and Motoring Discussions This forum is for messages of a general nature about Volvos that are not covered by other forums and other motoring related matters of interest. Users will need to register to post/reply. |
Information |
|
Road Signs: Time to change to Metric?Views : 33118 Replies : 358Users Viewing This Thread : |
View Poll Results: Should road signs be update to metric units? | |||
Yes | 75 | 27.37% | |
No | 199 | 72.63% | |
Voters: 274. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Sep 25th, 2020, 13:16 | #291 |
Non VOC Member
Last Online: Today 09:36
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Milton Keynes
|
Except you'd have to buy a 5.1m length, which would still be 3.5 inches short of 17ft (but I'm not sure there's wood yard near here that sell timber as long as that anyway ) one of the bizarre experiences I've had in a DIY place was to try to get the spotty youth to cut a piece of timber to 3.03m, he insisted it didn't need cutting as it came in that length already - 3.3m
__________________
David V70 2.5 10v Torslanda Manual 98 Sreg |
Sep 25th, 2020, 13:36 | #292 |
How Old?
Last Online: May 31st, 2021 13:28
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: redhill
|
Wrong Dash300 (at least round here). 4" x 2" is no longer offered unless if planed all round (PAR) and you purchase the next size up in metric standard sizes when sawn and machine down to your size. They went partial metric (which I loathe) ages ago, as did the brick industry (which I used to work for). Try finding housebricks to match those on your 25+ years old house for that extension unless you buy from an architectural salvage company as I did.
My current pet hate: car fuel economy facts listed (and respected by every user) in miles per gallon where schools teach more and more in metric units. Try converting mpg to km per litre? P |
Sep 25th, 2020, 14:20 | #293 |
Non VOC Member
Last Online: Today 09:36
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Milton Keynes
|
Multiply by 0.354, or divide by 3 for a quicker rough figure
I prefer litres per 100km, it's more obvious when you're using more or less fuel, working out how much fuel you've used is easier just look at how many hundred km you've done* and multiply l/100km by that, and mpg x l/100km = 282 (well almost but that's as close as any other metric/imperial conversion) *of course you need an odometer set to kms for that **Yes I drive a truck for a living and a bit of mental arithmetic whiles away the long miles/kilometres on the motorway.
__________________
David V70 2.5 10v Torslanda Manual 98 Sreg |
Sep 26th, 2020, 03:41 | #294 |
Aged Member
Last Online: Feb 20th, 2024 10:47
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Weeting
|
I would never want to change to km, be it fuel or distance.
I own a pro weather station and as such i also have my own server and a weather website etc. The station and site data is setup like this... Temp = C Wind speed = MPH Rain = mm Pressure = MB Visibility distance = Miles I also prefer snow in inches, but ever since our winters turned to into little PC Snowflakes meaning we dont get snow like we used to, ive started to use CM for snow depth Many of the apps I use recognise that the UK has its own set of data sets, means that we can use the above, ie, emp in C and wind in MPH, that's what the media uses anyway, really it should be temp = F when using MPH or C when using KPH and thankfully, many places recognise the UK uses this system, some apps still do not, but that's by the by, i prefer the UK system as it is, keep MPH and Miles
__________________
Regards, Bashy MY07 (56 plate) V70 Geartronic 2.4 D5 185bhp 173k, 17", full leather, an auto-dimming mirror and auto wipers are the best it can do - I have added (poorly) limo black, rear camera and parking sensors |
Sep 26th, 2020, 09:04 | #295 |
Junior Member
Last Online: Feb 11th, 2022 10:29
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Presteigne
|
I can sympathise with the idea - and it’s actually more like 40 years since we should have all be working in metric units (you can blame Margaret T for the confusion, she was secretary for education and said that both systems should be taught!) The cost of changing all the road signs is not justified at a time when we should be focusing on keeping jobs and the NHS going. My XC90 will tell me how fast I am going in mph or kmph anyway.
|
Sep 26th, 2020, 10:15 | #296 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 10:05
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
|
I've just stumbled upon this thread, skimmed through and found it quite interesting.
The original premise: that it might be time to change the road signs to metric ones, is a nonsense of course. We are a big enough country and economy to have our own way of doing things and there is nothing whatsoever wrong with the one we have in miles and yards. In a wider sense, of course schools, colleges and universities should teach both imperial and metric systems, everyone should be able to work with both (neither is very complicated) and switch between them (Mrs Thatcher was absolutely right in this respect). The world (not just the USA) will continue to use bits of the imperial system here and there, tyre diameters will continue to be mostly in inches, aircraft fuel will be mostly in pounds, big things will be in tons (and no one will bother to say whether they mean an imperial ton (2280lbs) or tonne - because in that context the difference won't matter). The screw that hold your camera onto the tripod will continue to have an imperial (actually Whitworth) thread for ever (if not longer). The metric system isn't always all that decimal anyway. Take the PS (Pferdestärke) - it is (from memory, so apologies if I don't have it exactly right) the power required to lift 75kgf at 1m per second. 75kgf isn't a very round number, but the figure at the end makes it about the same as a James Watt type horsepower (from memory 33,000 lbf.ft per minute). The units we use for time (hours/minutes/seconds) and for measuring angles (degrees/minutes/seconds) will probably never change, so the association between decimal making the metric system superior isn't all that strong as everyone (and particularly engineers and scientists) needs to be able to calculate in 60s, 24s and 360s... The case for changing would have been a stronger one prior to the 1980s when electronic computers started becoming part of our everyday lives, but today it is immaterial since the computer (the one in our phone, watch, car, cash register, vacuum cleaner...) can quickly do the linear conversion for us. Just my view on this interesting subject... but it would seem the overwhelming voice if the body of the kirk agrees: Good thread. Alan Last edited by Othen; Sep 26th, 2020 at 11:09. Reason: Spelling error. |
Sep 26th, 2020, 11:09 | #297 |
Old Rocker
Last Online: Today 06:13
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Tring
|
Good post, Alan, except for the typo (I’m assuming it’s a typo, anyway), an Imperial ton is 2240 lbs, hence 112 lbs is a hundredweight (cwt), or 1/20th of a ton. Intriguing that metrication seems to appear even here, though.
__________________
Just my opinion, please don't shoot me if it doesn't match yours! 2011 C70 D3 (now sold)and JZR 3 wheeler |
The Following User Says Thank You to Baxlin For This Useful Post: |
Sep 26th, 2020, 13:16 | #299 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 10:05
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
|
... just my fat fingers: 20 cwt x 8st x 14 lbs... easy isn't it :-)
|
Sep 26th, 2020, 13:22 | #300 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 10:05
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|