Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > XC40 '18> General

Notices

XC40 '18> General Forum for vehicles post 2018 on the Compact Modular Architecture or CMA Platform

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

T5 Hybrid Longevity?

Views : 687

Replies : 5

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Nov 11th, 2021, 09:47   #1
mercuryrev
New Member
 

Last Online: Nov 11th, 2021 18:08
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Auch
Default T5 Hybrid Longevity?

Having had an XC60 in the past, we are now thinking of returning to the fold and are looking at an XC40 and a hybrid in particular.

All our recent cars have been diesels and I'm wondering how well a 3 cylinder 1500cc petrol engine will last with higher mileages.

Or is the point of this particular model, that you shouldn't be making long distance trips?

Has anyone built up any serious miles with this engine yet?
mercuryrev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11th, 2021, 11:20   #2
jamei305
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Jan 11th, 2023 09:07
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Ely
Default

The 3-cyclinder 1500c engine has been fitted to the T3 without any hybrid tech. There's no reason whatsoever to suspect it might last any less longer than Volvo's 4-cylinder engines.
jamei305 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11th, 2021, 12:24   #3
mercuryrev
New Member
 

Last Online: Nov 11th, 2021 18:08
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Auch
Default

Thanks for the reply, my suspicion is not based on anything that I have read but not being sure how long these engines have been in existence, it made me wonder if anyone has done big miles with one.

I have been caught before with a huge cost to replace a DPF on a supposedly reliable VW after 75-80k. Equally I have bought, or driven, diesels since I can''t remember when, so spending a lot of money on a 3 cylinder petrol engine producing 180bhp makes me a little nervous.

After my VW experience I don't have much faith in a manufacturer admitting they have sold me a vehicle that wasn't fit for purpose.

In the old days (a couple of years ago) I would automatically just go for a 2 litre diesel for it's power, torque and ability to soak up the miles. Maybe I'm just being an old f*rt....
mercuryrev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11th, 2021, 13:11   #4
Clan
Experienced Member
 
Clan's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 09:37
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamei305 View Post
The 3-cyclinder 1500c engine has been fitted to the T3 without any hybrid tech. There's no reason whatsoever to suspect it might last any less longer than Volvo's 4-cylinder engines.
It IS the familiar volvo 2.0 vea engine we have had for the last 7 years , just one cylinder missing . up to 180 bhp from it too .
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience .
Clan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11th, 2021, 13:35   #5
jamei305
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Jan 11th, 2023 09:07
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Ely
Default

Well there we are, I knew I should have googled the exact engine before replying...
jamei305 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11th, 2021, 14:55   #6
Familyman 90
The Brit Brick
 
Familyman 90's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 13th, 2023 09:39
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Warwickshire
Default

Speaking as an engine builder of over 4 decades experience...

As a general rule of thumb, smaller capacity engines are, like for like, more robust. The simple physics is that s smaller, lighter piston and recipricating assembly "weighs" less at the top of the stroke than a large, heavier one. In simple terms this means thinks are less likely to break,

Now I say like for like, as along with less inertial stresses to accommodate designers will use lighter blocks, cranks, crank journals, etc, but the point holds true that a smaller capacity motor is no more inherently liable to have a shorter life than a large one. Unless Volvo have dropped a major clanger and designed in some kind of fault it should be competitive with any other well designed unit.

Neither being small capacity, a triple, or having a high specific output, make an engine automativally or inherently less durable, the same way being huge, multi cylinder and a lazy, output does not make engines inherently more reliable. Transmissions that handle that power are a different matter entirely...

Quote:
Originally Posted by mercuryrev View Post
Thanks for the reply, my suspicion is not based on anything that I have read but not being sure how long these engines have been in existence, it made me wonder if anyone has done big miles with one.

I have been caught before with a huge cost to replace a DPF on a supposedly reliable VW after 75-80k. Equally I have bought, or driven, diesels since I can''t remember when, so spending a lot of money on a 3 cylinder petrol engine producing 180bhp makes me a little nervous.

After my VW experience I don't have much faith in a manufacturer admitting they have sold me a vehicle that wasn't fit for purpose.

In the old days (a couple of years ago) I would automatically just go for a 2 litre diesel for it's power, torque and ability to soak up the miles. Maybe I'm just being an old f*rt....
The only people that reckon VW are reliable are VW. If you dig down and look at sources such as the Warranty Direct Reliabilty Index (which measure actual breakdows, and not simply customers impressions and opinions) you'll see they're nothing special, and some of their models actually perform quite poorly compared to rival products.
__________________
2005 C70 2.4T Collection convertible. 40,000 mile sunny day toy.

Last edited by Familyman 90; Nov 11th, 2021 at 15:16.
Familyman 90 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Familyman 90 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:40.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.