|
C30 / S40 & V50 '04-'12 / C70 '06-'13 General Forum for the P1-platform C30 / S40 / V50 / C70 models |
Information |
|
C30 front brake disc smaller than rears?!Views : 616 Replies : 6Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Jan 17th, 2022, 11:23 | #1 |
Junior Member
Last Online: Jan 17th, 2022 11:48
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hertfordshire
|
C30 front brake disc smaller than rears?!
2011 C30 2.0 Petrol.
Need to replace the front brake discs on my C30, and knowing I fitted 280mm to the rears last year, and just before I hit the order button I thought I'd double check the size on the calliper... I was a bit thrown when I saw they are 278mm... smaller than the rears?! Is this right? If so, it's goes against everything I know (allbeit not that much) about brake discs and pads, where I thought you always had bigger discs/rotors on the front? |
Jan 17th, 2022, 14:47 | #2 |
Member
|
That's correct. Remember that the rears are solid and the front are vented.
The lower spec cars/engines have 278mm at the front, mid-range have 300 and top-spec are 320mm. All rears are standard at 280mm. I wouldn't worry too much for road use. I've driven P1 cars with all three front setups and, for me, there is only a noticeable difference when using the 320mm setup as the calipers are much larger. With the smaller two front setups the calipers are the same.
__________________
Present: 2009 Volvo V50 1.6D DRIVe SE Past: 2004 Volvo S40 T5 SE |
Jan 17th, 2022, 19:38 | #3 |
FCW Auto Service
Last Online: Today 18:14
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Gloucester
|
I personally would be chucking some of the bigger 300mm disks on given they are compatible with same caliper.
The brake setups are a bit inconsistent on these cars. For example, my S40 T5 with 230bhp from factory only got 300mm disks, but a V50 D5 with 18bhp and 18" wheels came with 320mm disks and bigger calipers, despite having 50bhp LESS than the T5. |
Jan 18th, 2022, 11:14 | #4 | |
Member
|
Quote:
What I would say is that, having had cars with both 278mm and 300mm front discs I noticed absolutely no difference between them TBH. I did notice a difference with 320mm but then I changed the hoses to braided at the same time which may alos have had an effect.
__________________
Present: 2009 Volvo V50 1.6D DRIVe SE Past: 2004 Volvo S40 T5 SE |
|
Jan 18th, 2022, 11:30 | #5 | |
Member
|
Quote:
Different part numbers: Discs (obviously), Carriers (or retainer as Volvo calls it). It looks like the carriers are indeed different and would need to be swapped to support a change from 278mm to 300mm so it's them plus discs.
__________________
Present: 2009 Volvo V50 1.6D DRIVe SE Past: 2004 Volvo S40 T5 SE Last edited by iainmd; Jan 18th, 2022 at 11:46. |
|
Jan 18th, 2022, 13:36 | #6 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 21:24
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Manchester
|
brake sizes are based on the weight aswell as bhp
|
Apr 27th, 2022, 11:55 | #7 |
Member
|
Just thought I'd update. Needed new front discs and pads so decided to change the front 278mm setup for 300mm. Not a difficult switch at all. New carriers required (bought used and refurbished them) but everything else was an easy swap. Not a massive change frankly but thought I may as well.
__________________
Present: 2009 Volvo V50 1.6D DRIVe SE Past: 2004 Volvo S40 T5 SE |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to iainmd For This Useful Post: |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|