|
General Volvo and Motoring Discussions This forum is for messages of a general nature about Volvos that are not covered by other forums and other motoring related matters of interest. Users will need to register to post/reply. |
Information |
|
Geely againViews : 3230 Replies : 33Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Apr 27th, 2010, 09:36 | #1 |
arcturus
Last Online: Apr 10th, 2024 08:21
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sagres Portugal
|
Geely again
__________________
life's too short to drink bad wine |
Apr 27th, 2010, 09:46 | #2 |
VOC Member
Last Online: May 4th, 2023 20:38
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: West Sussex
|
In the video, did you see the production worker hitting the bonnet with a mallet?
__________________
William 745 GL - 1986, B230K 745 GLE - 1987, B230E |
Apr 27th, 2010, 10:54 | #3 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Mar 21st, 2016 21:21
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Exeter Devon
|
Yes. Somehow, as I've said before, I don't think there are going to ever, be any PROPER Volvo's again!!
Lovely video clip that, the reporter standing next to a lovely 'old' REAL Volvo in black, and then the Chinese approach to advanced engineering. "If it doesn't fit, smack it with the Birmingham Screwdriver!!" GOD help us!! They should re-brand the new Chinese built Non-Volvos.... B B C Built by Cowboys! Thank God for my 940!!
__________________
Are We Nearly There Yet! No longer a VOLVO owner, not by choice, but 'cause they don't make proper Volvos any more! Last edited by Oilydad; Apr 27th, 2010 at 11:02. |
Apr 27th, 2010, 15:03 | #4 |
Master Member
Last Online: Aug 9th, 2013 23:07
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: hastings
|
Volvo was most profitable when it had a limited range that sold on its reputation for bombproof, reliable, safe and reasonably fast cars. (the '50s-70s.) The Chinese market is where the US market was post-war. Car hungry. A 'new amazon' would offer something genuinely different to the majority of production there.
Volvo recognised that they were not a high volume car maker, but medium volume. Cars had a long (perhaps too long) lifespan in terms of number of years for each body design, but this gave them time to develop a customer base, iron out defects, and spread development costs over a longer period. The majority of cost to a manufacutrer in producing a car is the design and tooling for a new model. The more models a car company has, the more it has invested before it can see a dime in return. By the time the old 240 retired, it was a very high profit car, in spite of its labour intensive nature to build. If Geely wants to make Volvo profitable, they need to research what market sector Volvos would be most profitable in, produce a car to fit it, limit the number of variations and 'toys' on it, and focus on Volvo's core value of solidity. This means using high quality components, testing them for longevity, rectifying, and then not changing the body design to follow fashion. I disagree with the BBC report stating that high volume is the way forward. This has never reaped rewards for luxury car makers in the long run- look at Mercedes when they tried to increase production in the '90s. The backlash against the fall in quality hurt the marque in a way that people don't really think of Mercedes as good cars anymore. If 'new' Volvo could once again become known as cars for a lifetime, they would find that they have a ready market, not only the West, but also in the developing economies. A luxury car purchase is a much higher percentage of income to the 'wealthy' in developing countries than here. If ChinaVolvo wants to make inroads in the developing luxury car market, they need to recognise that there are already lots of manufacturers there making poorly made 'luxury' cars, but few that are able to make 'iconic' cars- those whose cachet outlives the fashions of the day. Likewise, most European 'luxury' cars aren't that well made either. As the quality declines, they enter a more level playing field with the Chinese domestics. I swore off modern cars long ago, as the quality kept going down just as the number of gizmos went up. Geely has a unique opportunity to de-ford Volvo, if they so choose. However, if they just use the Volvo badge as extra cachet for their luxury Geely 'BountifulHappiness 2300' they will quickly find the investment in the company to be worthless. |
Apr 27th, 2010, 15:53 | #5 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Jan 27th, 2024 21:36
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cranfield
|
|
Apr 27th, 2010, 16:53 | #6 |
VOC Member
Last Online: Aug 12th, 2015 14:44
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: sunderland
|
volvo have made profit
volvo have made 49 million dollars in the first quater of this year, read below
http://www.swedishwire.com/component...ings-to-profit |
Apr 27th, 2010, 17:48 | #8 |
XC90 Exec in Grey Pearl
Last Online: Aug 26th, 2014 21:46
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Norwich
|
Just how stupid are the directors of Ford?!
I couldn't help notice how awkward the Ford guy looked at the press conference - check it out on the Volvo Cars Corporate website if it is still there. |
Apr 27th, 2010, 18:22 | #9 | |
Experienced Member
Last Online: Today 14:22
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
|
Quote:
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience . |
|
Apr 27th, 2010, 18:28 | #10 |
Master Member
Last Online: Nov 13th, 2020 06:29
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Land of Ice & Snow
|
I've sat here and wrote 5 different things about China and how the world is heading into a catastophic recession because of them. But I just kept deleting them, because at the end of day, whats the point; it wont change anything. China is making the rest of the worlds industry redundant because no-one can compete with them financially. The 80's will feel like a happy memory compared to the recession we are heading for if this keeps up. Doom-mongering over.
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|