Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > AWD Discussion
Register Members CarsBlogs Help Calendar Mark Forums Read


AWD Discussion A forum dedicated to the AWD systems fitted to Volvo cars.

  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

XC60 Belt + possible engine issue - 50k miles-5 yrs old

Views : 1337

Replies : 1

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Dec 17th, 2016, 12:24   #1
Jan Grzyb
New Member

Last Online: Jan 11th, 2017 18:08
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: beaconsfield
Default XC60 Belt + possible engine issue - 50k miles-5 yrs old

Hi All

I took my car to a garage after a warning light came on due to a damaged serpentine belt. I was charged 2 hrs labour, total bill cost 193.00.

After payment, I drove down the road and within 50 metres the engine compression failed.

I then took the car to a main Volvo dealer, they sent me photos showing part of the serpentine belt was in the timing unit causing jumping with possible engine damage. Then I went back to the orginal Garage and had a meeting with Alex (The Owner) I shared the photos showing the sheared belt stuck in the timing belt unit.

He said stated that he felt I was not his responsibility to repair the engine if required. But would give me trade prices.

I said I would pay for the timing kit replacement as it should have been actioned during the initial repair.

I stated there was 50-50 chance of engine damage, as stated by Volvo main dealer.

The garage said he would repair the engine at trade prices. I wanted the initial repair completed correctly and then we review the situation.

He said he did a visual inspection of the time belt area - but did not remove the cover. He said the car was left running for 1 hour, also a colleague said the car was test driven. (These points were not mentioned on the invoice)

He stated that the car had a "recall" issue with the tensioner. He said this may have seized and this was part of the problem.. The Volvo Garage said the tensioner is fine. but does need adjusting at 54k Miles.

I have spoken to a registered vehicle assessors and they say it is a less than 50/50 if I go to court, that I will win. One person suggested an "approximate cause" approach.

I do not think it fair that I may have an engine repair bill. The car is back at original garage but no work has be carried out yet.

What is best practice in this situation.

Thoughts please and thanks Jan
Jan Grzyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17th, 2016, 14:16   #2
Brendan W
Premier Member
Brendan W's Avatar

Last Online: Today 16:53
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wexford

Serpentine failure at that age is rare. If a seized tensioner pulley caused it that would have been apparent at the time the belt was being replaced and it also should have been replaced.
It is very likely that a failed serpentine belt snags the crank pulley and bits of it get left in there. If the old belt had bits missing they should have taken a basic precaution and checked the timing belt cavity for residue. Any such residue can get tightly wound up behind the crank pulley and not make it's presence known till later.
Many would replace the timing belt at this point on the basis that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence of damage to it and serpentine belts always try their best to have a go at timing belts.
IMHO they failed to check as they should have. The only excuse they could have would be if in fact the residue was from an earlier belt failure and the one they removed was intact - a highly unlikely scenario.
You are lucky in one sense that the belt failure didn't kill the engine before it ever got near the garage. It appears that their neglect undid your luck.
I have no doubt that expert opinion could be adduced to support your claim that they should have been more careful.
Brendan W is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:23.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.