Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > S40 / V40 '96-'04 General

Notices

S40 / V40 '96-'04 General Forum for the Volvo S40 and V40 (Classic) Series from 1995-2004.

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Average MPG

Views : 14737

Replies : 143

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jul 17th, 2010, 09:23   #11
BobbyV
Senior Member
 
BobbyV's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 29th, 2024 16:52
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Notts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean1985 View Post
reading some of the XC90 posts about cruise control and they reckon it uses more fuel than not using it. In my opinion i seem to get better MPG using CC. can anyone confirm if its more economical using CC? are there any tests been done to compare the differances? would be nice to know so i can save as much as poss.
I found it less economical when i was running with heavy traffic as itwould constantly accelerate hard to get bak up to speed if I had to brake. Also u can ease of and accelerate gradually without it hen needed
BobbyV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 17th, 2010, 15:09   #12
960kg
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Dec 28th, 2022 12:25
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mercville
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean1985 View Post
reading some of the XC60 posts about cruise control and they reckon it uses more fuel than not using it. In my opinion i seem to get better MPG using CC. can anyone confirm if its more economical using CC? are there any tests been done to compare the differances? would be nice to know so i can save as much as poss.
.....with the info centre when using foot control on the motorway the mpg figure is difficult to control economically, but when i am on cruise control the mpg figure is surprisingly controlled and does prove for me to be more easy on the fuel........
__________________


Mercedes C320CDI Sport Estate 3 litre V6 7 Gear Auto
Remap 290bhp 628Nm torque @ 1600revs 45.1mpg
960kg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 17th, 2010, 16:51   #13
jez v40
Senior Member
 
jez v40's Avatar
 

Last Online: Sep 23rd, 2014 20:55
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: accrington
Default

i recently did a 190 round trip to north wales, mpg was 57, around town normally get around 38, 02 reg 115bhp diesel v40 (184k)
jez v40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 17th, 2010, 19:53   #14
myatt1972
Senior Member
 
myatt1972's Avatar
 

Last Online: Dec 28th, 2023 01:04
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: stafford
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 960kg View Post
.....with the info centre when using foot control on the motorway the mpg figure is difficult to control economically, but when i am on cruise control the mpg figure is surprisingly controlled and does prove for me to be more easy on the fuel........
Exactly the same for me, when on cruise I have the instant fuel showing and the readings are much more stable than I can do with my foot.
Keith...
myatt1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 17th, 2010, 20:08   #15
Dean1985
Master Member
 

Last Online: Jun 4th, 2021 20:51
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Norwich
Default

Glad to know, maybe the XC60 is differant then. at least on the V/S40 it's more economical with cruise on
Dean1985 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 17th, 2010, 20:36   #16
v70classic
New Member
 

Last Online: Aug 18th, 2010 19:04
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: hereford
Default

on my v70 2.5 diesel year 2000 i'm averaging 46.8mpg, which is mainly country roads and a small bit of town use, on a recent trip to bordeaux in france i averaged around 54mpg at speeds around 90mph. So it was definatley worth the extra hunting out a diesel one, and its like of refinement at low speed can be overlooked.
v70classic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 18th, 2010, 00:06   #17
dodger49
New Member
 

Last Online: Aug 25th, 2010 21:56
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: carlisle
Default

My '97 102,000-mile 2.0 V40 used to be capable of driving from Carlisle to Arras in N France on one tank of petrol - about 450 road miles - with two people and a light load on, and around 70-75mph. (Of course we take advantage of a boat for 20-odd miles of it - even a Volvo can't motor on water). That's an average of just over 40mpg.

Last time I measured the same journey, with three people and quite a lot more gear in the back for a longer hol, it turned in 404.....had to fill up on the amber light just before the Dover ferry terminal, so about 37mpg.

When my mum was in hospital over in the north East last year I drove over there and ferried my dad backwards and forwards to visit her for several days...lot of time spent on the A1 and I deliberately kept as close to 60 mph as poss - turned in 505 miles on one tank. ie 46mpg.

However, I recently treated the fuel system with some stuff I hadn't previous heard of - BG 44K - and not only is the engine now sounding and pulling like it did 60-odd thousand miles ago, but on a half tank of gas, mixed driving, a lot around town, it has managed more than 230 miles (42mpg). I'll report in again at the end of the tank. The car will also be going down the west coast ofr France next month and I'll be recording its performance in detail (just to annoy Ms Dodger49 as much as anything else). I'll be dead keen to see the mpg results for sustained crusing.
dodger49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19th, 2010, 01:05   #18
DWM
VOC Member
 
DWM's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 4th, 2023 18:13
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Oxford
Default

Just done a 600-mile outing this weekend - mainly a mixture of M-way and A roads, taking no special care to be economical (plenty of foot-to-floor overtaking to make reasonable progress in E Sussex in particular, where time for many people seems to have slowed to an intolerable standstill...). Started with full tank, and filled up again after 455 miles when the gauge showed 45 miles left and started flashing at me. About 37mpg at 45mph average. Info centre agrees and seems to be accurate.

If my info centre is to be believed, about 50mpg could be achieved on cruise control at a steady 50mph. Slowing down really does help, as all the advice says - it's simple aerodynamics. That said, slowing down is no substitute for having a diesel if this is what you care about. I achieved an easy 44mpg average last week in a borrowed V70 2.5D with 220k miles on, taking even less trouble to be economical...
__________________
(Formerly) 1988 745 B230K (Phoenix)
DWM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19th, 2010, 01:05   #19
chunderground
xc90 exec black+privacy
 

Last Online: Jul 12th, 2012 17:45
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: london
Default xc90 d5 fuel consumption

Driving with an eco right foot I can readout average MPG up to 24.5 mpg but drops to 22 wihen booting it. Average with my granny driving style is 23.5 mpg. Average speed is consistantly 22 mph.
Please give average speed with average mpg if you can.
This is my 09 with DPF

Last edited by chunderground; Jul 19th, 2010 at 01:08.
chunderground is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19th, 2010, 01:12   #20
DWM
VOC Member
 
DWM's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 4th, 2023 18:13
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Oxford
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dodger49 View Post
My '97 102,000-mile 2.0 V40..... I deliberately kept as close to 60 mph as poss - turned in 505 miles on one tank. ie 46mpg
I don't get this: I thought the tank was 60 litres i.e. about 13.3 gallons. In which case this surely works out as 38 mpg (???)
__________________
(Formerly) 1988 745 B230K (Phoenix)
DWM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:07.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.