Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > 200 Series General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

200 Series General Forum for the Volvo 240 and 260 cars

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Re-drilling alloys?

Views : 2363

Replies : 26

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jul 24th, 2013, 00:35   #21
wooble
Stay gold baby!
 

Last Online: Jul 24th, 2022 16:15
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bristol
Default

It would make them et38. 8.5" et38 would poke out from under the arches a lot, if you want an idea jack up one side, rest a 1" wooden batten across the studs and offer up the wheel to see what the poke is like with spacers. you'd probably need to roll the rear arches at least as well with wheels that far out. Fully laden, I've got less than 2mm clearance between my tyres and the arch lips, and I'm only running moderate offset 16x7s. For an example, the wheels pictured here are the equivalent of zero offset 8.5" on the front, so imagine wheels poking another 38mm further out. Those are my old wheels, and they were ridiculous fitment on a 240, hence why I sold them for a pile to an american with more money than sense, even if they were highly tasty

Personally I'd redrill and they'd fit just right, if you want to buy wheels for value or investment buy 4x100, 4x108 or 5x100 BBS or Compomotives, respray and watch the money roll in :P
wooble is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wooble For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 24th, 2013, 00:56   #22
Magnumpi
Master Member
 
Magnumpi's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 18th, 2024 20:42
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surrey
Default

Hhmmm, ok then so with spacers its looking like on the fronts its a no go. I have jacked up the back taken a wheel off and held the wheels up resting on the ends of the studs (how long are the studs?) to get an idea and on the rears atleast It appeared to me as they were still quite inset, but the track is narrower on the back is It not? I'll Check on the fronts tomo and possibly make some wooden spacers to get a proper idea.

I didn't buy them specifically to make money, more because they are one of my favourite wheel designs ever , but the fact they were relatively cheap was a bonus. I paid £350 for mine, currently there is only one set on eBay with the same dimensions admitedly fully restored , but up for £1800! I've not seen a set for less than £800, i could always swap barrels/rims for more suitable offsets.
__________________
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

Wanted 240 parts: Front black hockey sticks
Saloon rear lights
Front suspension struts
Magnumpi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24th, 2013, 20:32   #23
jonah
Member
 

Last Online: Feb 7th, 2024 18:56
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Staffordshire, UK.
Default

Most wheels have some degree of positive offset and adding a spacer reduces the offset, e.g. adding a 25mm spacer to a set of et40 FWD Volvo rims to make them et15 so they fit on a RWD model.

Adding a 25mm spacer to your already low offset et13 wheels will send them into negative offset, so the wheels will be et-12.

My 240 has slightly shortened trailing arms, to centre the wheels, and I have removed most of the rear arch lips and the 7.5" wide et-12 wheels I have are still a very snug fit with 225/45/17 tyres. I can't see 8.5" wide et-12 wheels having any chance of fitting.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by brodgar View Post
Please dude your family, not me
jonah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24th, 2013, 21:45   #24
wooble
Stay gold baby!
 

Last Online: Jul 24th, 2022 16:15
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bristol
Default

^^ this is correct. I was speaking from the bottom of 8 pints of Red Stripe last night, which would explain my miserable maths failure. I would suggest everyone else ignores my embarrassing mathematical failure. oops.
wooble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24th, 2013, 23:08   #25
crogthomas
Master Member
 
crogthomas's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 18th, 2024 16:12
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnumpi View Post
(how long are the studs?)
27mm

Try looking for FWD wheels, which are usually 40 or so ET. With a 20-27mm spacer they will end up around 15-20 ET which is very nearly what the Volvo wheels are.
crogthomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25th, 2013, 23:28   #26
Magnumpi
Master Member
 
Magnumpi's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 18th, 2024 20:42
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surrey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wooble View Post
^^ this is correct. I was speaking from the bottom of 8 pints of Red Stripe last night, which would explain my miserable maths failure. I would suggest everyone else ignores my embarrassing mathematical failure. oops.
Oh you utter scoundrel, just as I thought i was getting my head around it you throw me that curve-ball!

All joking aside i asked due to the wealth of miss-information about et across internet forums, It appears most people dont know what they are on about and the correct info gets lost.

I had already come to the conclusion they are et-12 with spacers as et is relative to the centerline of the rim so spacers make them negative, i Just wanted confirmation.

I did a rather non scientific test of taping a plumb bob to both front and back arches then measuring the gap from tyre wall to string, the front was 45mm, the rears 70mm so the track has a difference of 25mm front to back. Wish I'd know that when i trial fitted the rears.
I tested the fronts by Holding them up to the studs, they stick past the arch a fair few mm.
The gap from rear wheel lip to strut tower was 35mm, and as above the studs are 27mm so It would leave a gap of 8mm IF I was to get them redrilled, but still not sure If It would steer of even function properly!

I did take photos while doing so but modern tech defeats me and i can no longer get the pics from my phone to my pc.

Cheers for all the help guys.
__________________
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

Wanted 240 parts: Front black hockey sticks
Saloon rear lights
Front suspension struts
Magnumpi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28th, 2013, 01:14   #27
minesa240x3
loyalty
 
minesa240x3's Avatar
 

Last Online: Jul 28th, 2022 19:16
Join Date: May 2006
Location: faraway
Default

Hi very interesting discussion this and very informative too.
I hope you measured both nearside and offside rear when using the plumbob?

The reason being it varies when the car is loaded or unloaded.Now if you lower the rear by cutting the coils or even buying bespoke lowering springs it will throw the axle across.A shortened or adjustable PANHARD rod is the only way of putting the axle back into center position.

Shortening the front coilsprings will actually push the top of the wheel in and the bottom out but probably only by millimetres so not noticeable.

Regards Brian.
minesa240x3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:55.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.