Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "General Topics" > General Volvo and Motoring Discussions
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

General Volvo and Motoring Discussions This forum is for messages of a general nature about Volvos that are not covered by other forums and other motoring related matters of interest. Users will need to register to post/reply.

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Thinking about a DrivE model....!?

Views : 1783

Replies : 22

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Feb 14th, 2013, 20:01   #11
S70 B5254T
☭Nick☭
 
S70 B5254T's Avatar
 

Last Online: Jun 22nd, 2014 23:30
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lincolnshire
Default

I think the figure of 45mpg was quoted from an automatic doing mixed driving. Over a good number of miles, as the OP is covering, you'd be unlucky to get less than 50-55mpg from a 1.6D manual, unless you're caning it.
__________________

1998 Volvo S70 CD 2.5T 20 valve (B5254T)
Community First Responder transport & Daily Driver
previously...1994 Volvo 854 SE 2.0 20 valve "L411XCC" &
1999 Volvo S40 2.0T SE "T283LTW"

Last edited by S70 B5254T; Feb 14th, 2013 at 20:11. Reason: Added "1.6D"
S70 B5254T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14th, 2013, 20:33   #12
keithjeb
Member
 

Last Online: Apr 10th, 2014 10:17
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Manchester
Default

My average on the commute in a c30 d2 is about 48 (15 miles of m60 car park), 57 on motorway runs. Probably not worth changing specially from a d5,if I were you I'd be looking into a d3, stop start saves little petrol, and will be much more drive able in an s60 than the d2/1.6d
keithjeb is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to keithjeb For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 14th, 2013, 20:49   #13
volvorocks
Rodney
 
volvorocks's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 4th, 2016 05:02
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On The Street
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keithjeb View Post
,if I were you I'd be looking into a d3, stop start saves little petrol, and will be much more drive able in an s60 than the d2/1.6d
The s60 D2 is a fine machine and drives nicely as a manual. Fine round town, and torquey on the motorway. It does lack a bit of oomph sometimes, which is where I agree a D3 would be somewhat better. I always switch stop/start off when getting in the vehicle, as its sometimes a nuisance. Get out of a D2 and then into a D5 and the difference is easy to notice. Then again what do we compare things to? I have and have had some pretty quick motors, although I suppose if you get out of them and get on a performance bike, the cars will feel slow..!!!

The s60 though in D2 form is adequate, unless you require huge performance. The D3 is a step up and a bit better I suppose, although never driven one.

Regards
volvorocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14th, 2013, 21:13   #14
steeshy
New Member
 
steeshy's Avatar
 

Last Online: Jan 13th, 2024 23:52
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Peterhead
Default

Roge 1
I live in Peterhead & travel to Aberdeen everyday for work. From my house door to my works door is a distance of 38 miles, therefore a 76 mile round trip. I changed my old S40 to a new 59 plate 1.6D S40 Drive model on the basis of it's advertised fuel economy.

Below you'll see 3 years worth of driving in the real world and my figures are from the actual fuel receipts (anal retentive I know, ha ha) and not the cars fuel computer. I always run as far as I can on a single tank then fill up 'till until the pump automatically stops as a reasonable constant. In addition I have two others in my car on some days, not an inconsiderable weight penalty.

The best return I had was on a return drive to Swansea from Aberdeen last year where I actually got 69.3mpg.

I've done 62,485 miles so far in 3 years of driving and have not had any problems with the car whatsoever (thank God coz I'm not a fan of Arnlod Clark Volvo Aberdeen aftercare.)

I have two notes of caution (for me anyway.) On single carriageway roads you really need to plan ahead when overtaking. Dropping to 3rd and flooring it is the best way to get it going. My second niggle is that the interior lights to show the headlamps are on reflect in my door mirror at night and is useless as a result.

YEAR 3 OF S40 1.6D drive
Mileage for the last 12 months is 22,292 miles
Fuel used in the last 12 months is 1,769.3 litres = 389.19 gallons
Fuel cost in the last 12 months is £2530.03p
This equates to 57.27mpg or 11.35 pence per mile.

YEAR 2 OF S40 1.6D drive
Mileage for the last 12 months is 18,406 miles
Fuel used in the last 12 months is 1413.05 litres = 310.83 gallons
Fuel cost in the last 12 months is £1985.65p
This equates to 59.21 mpg or 10.78 pence per mile

YEAR 1 OF S40 1.6D drive
Mileage for the last 12 months is 16,626 miles
Fuel used in the last 12 months is 1299.21 litres = 285.79 gallons
Fuel cost in the last 12 months is £1515.67p
This equates to 57.43mpg or 9.11 pence per mile

Regards
Steven
steeshy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to steeshy For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 14th, 2013, 21:20   #15
S70 B5254T
☭Nick☭
 
S70 B5254T's Avatar
 

Last Online: Jun 22nd, 2014 23:30
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lincolnshire
Default

Good figures there Steven Extra power is always nice, but it's hard to argue with MPG figures like that! Every car is a compromise; it's down to the individual and their own priorities.
__________________

1998 Volvo S70 CD 2.5T 20 valve (B5254T)
Community First Responder transport & Daily Driver
previously...1994 Volvo 854 SE 2.0 20 valve "L411XCC" &
1999 Volvo S40 2.0T SE "T283LTW"
S70 B5254T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14th, 2013, 21:23   #16
ozwol
New Member
 

Last Online: Mar 1st, 2013 08:02
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Leeds
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by volvorocks View Post
1.6 D manual S40 is fine, not a powerhouse, but moves along nicely once moving. At 3 years old no reeal faults apart from a boot lid that would not close and the air con condenser. Same for D2 S60. Bit of a slug to start off but again goes nicely once moving. Avoid an auto D2 or 1.6. Terrible gearbox, although fuel is around the 45mpg in normal everyday driving.

Regards
Our d2 auto powershift box is excellent, ultra smooth with intelligent shifts, better than the zf6hp26 in the BM. Why do you say its terrible?
ozwol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14th, 2013, 21:33   #17
keithjeb
Member
 

Last Online: Apr 10th, 2014 10:17
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Manchester
Default

Is that road a 50/60 limit by any chance? That does make ahuge difference according to the trip computer I average touching 75 in the 50 average between Leeds & Manchester
Quote:
Originally Posted by steeshy View Post
Roge 1
I live in Peterhead & travel to Aberdeen everyday for work. From my house door to my works door is a distance of 38 miles, therefore a 76 mile round trip. I changed my old S40 to a new 59 plate 1.6D S40 Drive model on the basis of it's advertised fuel economy.

Below you'll see 3 years worth of driving in the real world and my figures are from the actual fuel receipts (anal retentive I know, ha ha) and not the cars fuel computer. I always run as far as I can on a single tank then fill up 'till until the pump automatically stops as a reasonable constant. In addition I have two others in my car on some days, not an inconsiderable weight penalty.

The best return I had was on a return drive to Swansea from Aberdeen last year where I actually got 69.3mpg.

I've done 62,485 miles so far in 3 years of driving and have not had any problems with the car whatsoever (thank God coz I'm not a fan of Arnlod Clark Volvo Aberdeen aftercare.)

I have two notes of caution (for me anyway.) On single carriageway roads you really need to plan ahead when overtaking. Dropping to 3rd and flooring it is the best way to get it going. My second niggle is that the interior lights to show the headlamps are on reflect in my door mirror at night and is useless as a result.

YEAR 3 OF S40 1.6D drive
Mileage for the last 12 months is 22,292 miles
Fuel used in the last 12 months is 1,769.3 litres = 389.19 gallons
Fuel cost in the last 12 months is £2530.03p
This equates to 57.27mpg or 11.35 pence per mile.

YEAR 2 OF S40 1.6D drive
Mileage for the last 12 months is 18,406 miles
Fuel used in the last 12 months is 1413.05 litres = 310.83 gallons
Fuel cost in the last 12 months is £1985.65p
This equates to 59.21 mpg or 10.78 pence per mile

YEAR 1 OF S40 1.6D drive
Mileage for the last 12 months is 16,626 miles
Fuel used in the last 12 months is 1299.21 litres = 285.79 gallons
Fuel cost in the last 12 months is £1515.67p
This equates to 57.43mpg or 9.11 pence per mile

Regards
Steven
keithjeb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14th, 2013, 21:43   #18
Wiznae
VOC Member
 
Wiznae's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 30th, 2014 18:43
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Cumbernauld
Default

I have had the V70 1.6 DRIVe for just under 2 years and I am absolutely delighted with it - As I said in earlier posts I can get 58 Mpg on a 264 mile run from Cumbernauld to Lincolnshire with the cruise set at 70 - 75

I also, on occasion, take a 74 mile trip (148 round trip) with 3 others and 4 sets of Golf Clubs with no problems whatsover - It is not a rocket but it sure as hell ain't a donkey
__________________
Volvo V70 DRIVe (109) ES November 2010 Edition
Wiznae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14th, 2013, 21:52   #19
volvorocks
Rodney
 
volvorocks's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 4th, 2016 05:02
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On The Street
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozwol View Post
Our d2 auto powershift box is excellent, ultra smooth with intelligent shifts, better than the zf6hp26 in the BM. Why do you say its terrible?
Hi ozwol

Set off fast (pedal to the metal) and nothing happens for a good second, then it flies forward, then it feels as though the brakes are applying then it revs then it settles down. It also cannot decide which gear to be in. I do not like the fact (especially in sport mode (S) ) it holds on to the revs. Whats the point because torque/power runs out on the D2 around 3k - so why does the box allow the engine to rev to 4.5k? Its all noise and no progress.Under normal driving I feel it still holds on to revs for far too long. In the manual s60 D2 it sails up hills in a higher gear on the motorway. In the powershift it kicks down with the slightest application of the throttle - sending the revs well over 3k and goes nowhere!

Put it in manual, and its kind of ''not manual' - the box decides still which gear you 'want' to be in changing down on a whim. I find the box a tad jerky, especially when coming to park. The box in D holds the car on a slight incline (lets say you are parking) and a slight touch of the throttle produces no forward motion. Dab the throttle a bit more and again it 'shoots' forward resulting in the need for a quick application of the brakes.

I suppose it depends what you are used to. I have driven Jag autos RR autos, Merc autos, Renault autos, Toyota autos etc and all were better. Even the old 244 dl auto was ok. When I first got the XC60 I tested the geartronic, and it couldn't decide which gear it wanted to be in.30mph on a town run - hit a slight incline and it changed down then up then down again - It was the same on cruise..!!

Hit a bend and when one wanted to be in say 2nd, the box was in 3rd, or if one wanted to be in 3rd to power out of the bend, the box was in 4th.The car was in either too low a gear or too high a gear.

When we got the XC60 ,I actually originally wanted a T5 XC60 powershift, although this was only in FWD. To get AWD one had to go to the T6 - and this was far too uneconomical even considering I only do about 45k ish over 3 years.

I reckon (although have not driven) that the higher power engines coupled with powershift is fine. Its ok on a Ford, although in the Volvo application, especially on the lower power variants, I cannot get on with it.

This of course is just my opinion, and some may disagree.

Regards

Last edited by volvorocks; Feb 14th, 2013 at 21:57.
volvorocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14th, 2013, 21:57   #20
steeshy
New Member
 
steeshy's Avatar
 

Last Online: Jan 13th, 2024 23:52
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Peterhead
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by keithjeb View Post
Is that road a 50/60 limit by any chance? That does make ahuge difference according to the trip computer I average touching 75 in the 50 average between Leeds & Manchester
It's a mixture of single carriageway A class 60mph road, a twisty B 60mph road and a 70mph dual carriageway.
Forgot to say my S40 is a manual 5 speed box and I dont deliberately drive conservatively either.

Steven
steeshy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:16.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.