|
XC90 '02–'15 General Forum for the P2-platform XC90 model |
Information |
|
Cam belt failureViews : 12473 Replies : 70Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Sep 11th, 2009, 10:16 | #1 |
New Member
Last Online: Sep 11th, 2009 11:57
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: High Wycombe
|
Cam belt failure
Hi I wondeer if someone can help. I have a Volvo XC90 (2004) with 60,000 miles full Volvo service history. I purchased this from a main dealer and am second owner.
I recently had a cam belt failure as I was driving on the motorway and now have an enormous bill from Volvo for a new engine. Has anyone else had a similar issue and what did you do. I cannot afford the quote I have been given by Volvo. My argument is that the Cam belt should not have failed as Volvo recommend this to be replaced at 96,000 miles and I am no where near thsi mileage |
Sep 11th, 2009, 15:54 | #2 |
Member
Last Online: Oct 31st, 2013 14:19
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Somerset
|
I work for a Ford dealer, so can't guarantee that Volvo's procedure is the same, but Ford's warranty on cambelts is:
"12 months, or next due scheduled replacement, whichever occurs first" meaning that you have a maximum of one year guarantee on belts. Always seems a bit out of order, bearing in mind that most Ford belts have an 8 or 10 year/ 80 - 100k replacement schedule, but that is all thats offered. |
Sep 11th, 2009, 17:27 | #3 |
Master Member
Last Online: Aug 31st, 2010 20:49
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Deep Down Under ;)
|
Mate, look up the details on when the belt is meant to be changed. Should be in your service history.
If it's at about 80k, or 8 years, as I suspect, could well be more these days - do not pay for a new/re-built engine. (or as you stated above) It FAILED BEFORE it was meant to be changed. Going by the above, if a belt failed at 1 year and 3.5 months, with only 8,000 miles on it, and they say "it's out of warranty" its utter bollocks. Do you have any Warranty aswell? Policies cover this sort of thing. You have adhered (as best to my/your knowledge) to your schedule changing intervals. The fact that it's got a Full Volvo Service history backs up your case. They should pay for it, or Volvo themselves. Fight mate. edit: *editted some parts, read the OP more carefully |
Sep 11th, 2009, 20:14 | #4 |
Experienced Member
Last Online: Today 16:35
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
|
are there no open policies on your car for this problem?? You need to ask the dealer to show you the list for your particular car which they can print off , OR ask customer services .
If nothing applies , didnt you hear any strange noises sometime before it failed ? If all else fails the best option is to obtain a second hand engine and have this fitted .
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience . |
Oct 24th, 2009, 11:44 | #5 |
New Member
Last Online: Jan 4th, 2010 19:45
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Uckfield
|
I Also have a 2004 XC 90 with 69,000 miles and a full service history and the cam belt tensioner failed last week, car is with main dealer and I am waiting for them to asses the full amount of damage to the engine
|
Oct 24th, 2009, 11:49 | #6 |
Experienced Member
Last Online: Today 16:35
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
|
An economic repair here is a new head about £1300 ( not a full engine at £3700 ) It is very unlikely the bottom end is damaged , because the camshaft bearing caps are designed to snap and relieve the forces if this happens ...but check all 5 piston heights above the block , if within about 0.1 mm then you wont have a bent connecting rod ... Pistons are designed to be higher than the block ..
Labour times for fitting a new head is very similar to that of fitting a new engine ...
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience . |
Oct 24th, 2009, 13:15 | #7 |
Grumpy Old Git
Last Online: Apr 19th, 2024 09:16
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Yorkshire
|
I think you have a pretty compelling case to take to Trading Standards if Volvo do not pay up - it has full Volvo service history, and the belt is barely into 2/3rds of Volvo's recommended change interval. Complications may arise in proving it was the belt that failed and not some other component which overstressed the belt causing it to fail.
I'd agree that a replacement engine is not required - if it was me (and I don't have any warranty) I'd change the head and any other components as required - it is unlikely to have damaged the crankshaft, so you'll be looking at maybe a few pistons, maybe a conrod, bearings, valves (I'm assuming its an interference engine - most are these days) along with new belt, tensioner, water pump as a precaution etc. As a very rough guess £1000-1500 using a secondhand head (from say Brandons). HOWEVER, if Volvo do the repair under warranty, then I would demand a new engine just to be awkward! Good luck!
__________________
S40 2.4i '07 Japanese import '96 850R - https://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=312484 Ex Danish Embassy '96 940 GLE LPT - https://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=326071 |
Oct 24th, 2009, 14:00 | #8 |
VOC Member
Last Online: Mar 18th, 2024 12:17
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Henley on Thames
|
Did your belt actually break or did the timing belt tensioner fail? The reason I ask is that there seem to be quite a few failures at early mileages of timing belt tensioners in these engines , reference in other Volvo forums, Honest John, etc.. If it was the timing belt tensioner, it is apparently recommended by Volvo to be changed at 96 thou / 8 years
__________________
[IMG]Volvo2 by Strider'swoman, on Flickr[/IMG] Current '96 945 2.3 lpt - Aurigas, tailgate spoiler, sports grille, lpg fuelled Previous '88 764 TD, '92 945 TD, '88 745, '81 244 DL |
Oct 24th, 2009, 14:13 | #9 |
Forum Support Team
Last Online: May 26th, 2024 06:36
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Here.... obviously!
|
Im not sure where you stand with warranties but i would of thought with a full service history that the dealer that serviced it previously would offer to do the work as goodwill at a cheap rate at least
|
Oct 24th, 2009, 14:54 | #10 |
New Member
Last Online: Jan 4th, 2010 19:45
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Uckfield
|
It was the tensioner that failed causing the belt to jump
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|