Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > 850 / S70 & V70 '96-'99 / C70 '97-'05 General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

850 / S70 & V70 '96-'99 / C70 '97-'05 General Forum for the 850 and P80-platform 70-series models

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

RICA 280 vs. 304

Views : 9613

Replies : 150

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Oct 7th, 2005, 11:13   #11
volvotuning
Guest
 

Location:
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

Well there you have it. Go for the 280 bhp version. No one will dispute this. Price is £340.75 inc VAT and the official figures are 280 bhp and 405 Nm torque.

Adam.
 
Old Oct 7th, 2005, 15:39   #12
sholtby
Premier Member
 
sholtby's Avatar
 

Last Online: May 26th, 2010 20:17
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: north east
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

Don,

Have you ever compared the Rica and MTE software to see if there are any significant differences in boost pressure, fueling, timing etc?

Simon
sholtby is offline  
Old Oct 7th, 2005, 20:26   #13
Shestica
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Oct 16th, 2009 11:52
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: West Midlands
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304



>It is just a plain lack of honesty..maybe stupidity or
>gullibility for any party, be they a supplier or user to make
>exagerated and/or unachievable claims for a product and its
>effect in this respect.
>
>
>Don.Norchi.
>
>www.kalmar-union.com
>
>TME software for serious Volvo Tuning.

Interesting.

So Don, what you are effectively saying is that "Anyone" that has paid money for a Rica 300+ BHP off the shelf upgrade is stupid and gullible, has been lied to and tricked out of money. Also you are effectively saying that Rica Engineering BV (An international company that works with most major manufacturers in the automotive industry wordwide and that has been in business for years) is making false claims and lying to its customers.....?

Is that what you are saying Don?

(And i would like a reply please)




Shestica is offline  
Old Oct 7th, 2005, 21:26   #14
SaffronC70
aka Whitey
 
SaffronC70's Avatar
 

Last Online: Sep 8th, 2008 00:34
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Walton-on-Thames, Surrey
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

This is my Rica 340 (light line) vs. MTE 19T (dark line) maps :

http://chriswhiteuk.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/dyno/comp.jpg

Done on the same day, same rollers, same operator.

Whatever you go for, you'll be impressed !!

Chris

More dyno plots on website.
________________________________________________

http://chriswhiteuk.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/sava.jpg with a few go faster modifications . .

http://chriswhiteuk.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
SaffronC70 is offline  
Old Oct 7th, 2005, 21:38   #15
pyaap
Non-T4 T4s RULE!!!!
 
pyaap's Avatar
 

Last Online: Mar 29th, 2017 11:24
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bristol / Bath
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304


>>It is just a plain lack of honesty..maybe stupidity or
>>gullibility for any party, be they a supplier or user to
>make
>>exagerated and/or unachievable claims for a product and its
>>effect in this respect.


I think this is a very fair point and wish that all businesses abide by such policies. Any business which exagerates their claims will eventually get caught out and have to face the music; its simply a matter of time.


>So Don, what you are effectively saying is that "Anyone" that
>has paid money for a Rica 300+ BHP off the shelf upgrade is
>stupid and gullible, has been lied to and tricked out of
>money. Also you are effectively saying that Rica Engineering
>BV (An international company that works with most major
>manufacturers in the automotive industry wordwide and that has
>been in business for years) is making false claims and lying
>to its customers.....?

So then Shestica, are you then categorically stating that every car which gets a RICA 300+bhp remap indeed has 300+bhp and no less? I would like an answer too :-)
pyaap is offline  
Old Oct 7th, 2005, 21:48   #16
adieu
Master Member
 
adieu's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 5th, 2021 19:07
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: swindon
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6...ingroad8da.jpg
__________________
Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary… That’s what gets you.

A turbo: Exhaust gasses go into the turbocharger and spin it, witchcraft happens and you go faster
adieu is offline  
Old Oct 7th, 2005, 21:59   #17
adieu
Master Member
 
adieu's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 5th, 2021 19:07
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: swindon
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

Sorry forgot the text....lol


Here ya go:

http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6...ingroad8da.jpg

Here is my Graph from my rolling roads. The Black is the Rica chip and the Red is the run done with MTE. Ok so they wern't done on the same day but you can see that both bits of software give the same power BUT the MTE software gave me more torque. I paid nearly £600 for my RICA and never saw the 300BHP promised by the advert....Has anyone? If so maybe you should post your results also, if carried out on a 3rd party rolling road.

And my car now has a Hybrid Turbo from Turbo Technics, a 2.5" cat back system and a KN induction kit and I still only see 195BHP at the wheels. Please bear in mind my car is now customed mapped to allow everyday SAFE driving (limited to 1.1Bar)...No worries of it blowing up in my face or bending something. Maybe why I only see 195BHP.

I also have some more graphs from before anything was done other than the Rica map...they only show 173BHP!!!!!!


Remember I paid nearly £600 for a 300 Bhp upgrade .......

1996 T5R 855....90ish K on the clock when chipped

300BHP..............NO CHANCE!!!!!


Please also remember I have the only Hybrid turbo fitted to an 850 in the UK and this cost me alot and gave me an extra 22bhp. So when Don say's you have to spend money he means it....lol

See my link below for other graphs.


Regards

Iain
__________________
Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary… That’s what gets you.

A turbo: Exhaust gasses go into the turbocharger and spin it, witchcraft happens and you go faster
adieu is offline  
Old Oct 7th, 2005, 22:31   #18
Shestica
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Oct 16th, 2009 11:52
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: West Midlands
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

>
>>>It is just a plain lack of honesty..maybe stupidity or
>>>gullibility for any party, be they a supplier or user to
>>make
>>>exagerated and/or unachievable claims for a product and
>its
>>>effect in this respect.
>
>
>I think this is a very fair point and wish that all businesses
>abide by such policies. Any business which exagerates their
>claims will eventually get caught out and have to face the
>music; its simply a matter of time.
>
>
>>So Don, what you are effectively saying is that "Anyone"
>that
>>has paid money for a Rica 300+ BHP off the shelf upgrade is
>>stupid and gullible, has been lied to and tricked out of
>>money. Also you are effectively saying that Rica Engineering
>>BV (An international company that works with most major
>>manufacturers in the automotive industry wordwide and that
>has
>>been in business for years) is making false claims and lying
>>to its customers.....?
>
>So then Shestica, are you then categorically stating that
>every car which gets a RICA 300+bhp remap indeed has 300+bhp
>and no less? I would like an answer too :-)

I'm not stating anything, merely asking a question.

I'll let Don answer "my" question in his own time.
Shestica is offline  
Old Oct 7th, 2005, 22:36   #19
adieu
Master Member
 
adieu's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 5th, 2021 19:07
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: swindon
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

Shestica

So your not claiming that Rica or whoever supplies the chip can give a T5R 300 bhp? Just by playing with the ECU program?

And if this is the case why do you question Don?

Regards

Iain

__________________
Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary… That’s what gets you.

A turbo: Exhaust gasses go into the turbocharger and spin it, witchcraft happens and you go faster
adieu is offline  
Old Oct 7th, 2005, 22:37   #20
pyaap
Non-T4 T4s RULE!!!!
 
pyaap's Avatar
 

Last Online: Mar 29th, 2017 11:24
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bristol / Bath
Default RE: RICA 280 vs. 304

>I'm not stating anything, merely asking a question.

No problem, I totally understand your reluctance to answer my question. Actually, I think it looks like some others have answered it for you ;-)
pyaap is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:56.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.