Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > PV, 120 (Amazon), 1800 General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

PV, 120 (Amazon), 1800 General Forum for the Volvo PV, 120 and 1800 cars

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

No Mount for Slave Cylinder?

Views : 1167

Replies : 27

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Apr 10th, 2020, 00:48   #1
ddininio
New Member
 

Last Online: Apr 11th, 2020 06:05
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Toronto
Default No Mount for Slave Cylinder?

Hi All,

I've got a '64 Amazon that is missing the transmission linkage. It's an M40 transmission. I've got the new parts but there is no where to mount the slave cylinder to the bell housing. I've looking at diagrams, articles and even watched Wheeler Dealers episode and all housings have a mount for the slave cylinder. Mine doesn't. Do I have the wrong housing or am I missing something?

See the two pictures attached. One shows the mount (not mine), the other shows mine (no mount)



Dave
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Housing with Mount (Wheeler Dealers).jpg (58.0 KB, 32 views)
File Type: jpg My trans No Mount.jpg (110.6 KB, 33 views)
ddininio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 10th, 2020, 04:00   #2
Ron Kwas
Premier Member
 
Ron Kwas's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 00:11
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Connecticut, USA
Default

Dave;

First picture is of the Bell housing with Hydraulic Slave, where actuator rod pushes on (forged) throwout lever (as can be seen).
Second picture is of a later Bellhousing with Clutch Cable (not present), where cable pulls on (formed sheetmetal) throwout lever (visible).

So it looks like you've got a cable type bellhousing when in a '64 (with hydraulic clutch), you should have an early type bellhousing.

See also: https://www.sw-em.com/Clutch_-_cable_actuated_Notes.htm

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news...
Ron Kwas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 10th, 2020, 04:04   #3
ddininio
New Member
 

Last Online: Apr 11th, 2020 06:05
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Toronto
Default

Hi Ron,

Thanks for the feedback. How would you suggest I move forward? Change the bell housing to a hydraulic one, or change to a cable system? There is no room for the clutch arm to be pushed (towards back of car). There is only room for it to be pulled towards the engine. Do both hydraulic and cable pull the arm?

Last edited by ddininio; Apr 10th, 2020 at 04:08.
ddininio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 10th, 2020, 10:03   #4
Derek UK
VOC Member
 
Derek UK's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 18th, 2024 17:06
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chatham
Default

Do you have a clutch master cylinder fitted with push rod from the pedal? '64 was Hydraulic with B18. Cable came when Volvo fitted the B20. It's possible that you have a B20/M40? You can mix and match a bit but most would stay away from using a cable clutch on a B18 Amazon. Did Canada have B20 Amazons officially, USA didn't. Bottom line fit a B18 bell housing with hydraulic slave set-up. Hydraulic pushes, cable pulls. The levers are mounted differently inside the bell housing to make this possible.
Derek UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 10th, 2020, 16:34   #5
ddininio
New Member
 

Last Online: Apr 11th, 2020 06:05
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Toronto
Default

Hi Ron,

I know that I have a B18 engine and an M40 transmission. I don't think the hydraulic will work as there is no room between the arm and housing for the arm to be "pushed". There is lots of room for it to be pulled which looks like it was meant for. I would rather not remove the transmission to put a new bell housing in. How difficult would it be to convert it to a cable system?
ddininio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 10th, 2020, 19:39   #6
Volvo_133
VOC member
 

Last Online: Yesterday 17:44
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sheffield
Default clutch

As others have mentioned, the operating arm on a hydraulic clutch is different on the cable type. With the hyd bellhousing and operating arm fitted you will have room for the cyl piston to push. Unless the tunnel has been modified at sometime.
I can remove my gearbox, replace the clutch and refit the gearbox in 4 hours including a tea break! I think your biggest issue will be finding a hyd type bellhousing.
The later cars with the cable clutch do look messy under the hood. Your car will also be period correct if left hydraulic.
Volvo_133 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 11th, 2020, 00:00   #7
grumpydad
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Apr 18th, 2024 20:23
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: eastsussex
Default

Hi
put a pic up of the bulkhead where the clutch and brake cylinder are
that will tell all
grumpydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 11th, 2020, 01:03   #8
ddininio
New Member
 

Last Online: Apr 11th, 2020 06:05
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Toronto
Default

@Volvo 133 - I'm not worried about being period correct or if it looks messy. I definitely know the arm is for a cable, not a piston. But you're right. I can't find a hydraulic housing anywhere. And I have 2 extra cable ones as well. So let's say I want to stay with cable.

@ Ron - attached are 2 pics of the bulkhead. As you can see there is a hold to the right of the brake cylinder where the clutch cylinder goes. I guess the question is, can I run a cable through the firewall and attached it to the pedal? I know I need a pedal with the hook at the top for the cable connect.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Bulkhead1.jpg (136.3 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg Bulkhead2.jpg (136.3 KB, 23 views)
ddininio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 11th, 2020, 01:55   #9
Ron Kwas
Premier Member
 
Ron Kwas's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 00:11
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Connecticut, USA
Default

dd;

The short answer is no...remember, anything CAN be done, but the question to be answered first is: should it be...

Converting the Clutch Pedal from a push-a-rod-into-the-Master-Cyl to a pull-a-cable-end-with-respect-to-a-sheath is quite involved, and not really necessary when the parts to put yours right exist...I suggest you get a hydraulic suitable Bellhousing and associated parts (any 122 donor car will do, and don't tell me you cant find one of those!)

Cheers
Ron Kwas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 11th, 2020, 06:05   #10
ddininio
New Member
 

Last Online: Apr 11th, 2020 06:05
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Toronto
Default

Ron,

I will follow your expert opinion and try to find a hydraulic housing. Unfortunately 122s are very rare in Toronto and Canada for that matter. But I will find one and make it right. Thanks for the advice and support.

Dave
ddininio is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:58.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.