Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > S60 & V60 '11-'18 / XC60 '09-'17 General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

S60 & V60 '11-'18 / XC60 '09-'17 General Forum for the P3-platform 60-series models

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Wing mirror destruction

Views : 2171

Replies : 24

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jan 30th, 2017, 19:49   #21
norco
Member
 

Last Online: May 6th, 2019 20:06
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North West
Default

I am in the process of taking someone to court after someone U turned into my xc. They denied liability. So far it's cost £300 excess and £100 hike in premium until resolved. It's infuriating and a slow process - happened last April! I got a dash cam shortly after.
norco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 30th, 2017, 20:29   #22
TheLeeds
Senior Member
 
TheLeeds's Avatar
 

Last Online: Dec 11th, 2023 12:02
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hants / Sussex
Default

Glad to hear you got a decent outcome.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lordlichfield View Post
I know that the other party hit your car but if this had gone to court fully I'm pretty sure it would have been a 50/50 result.

I've been in court twice in the last 5 years and regardless of what actually happened, in my experience the judge goes for the simplest judgment. The opposing barrister would argue that responsibility to avoid the collision lay with both parties in this video you can see hear is the sound of the collision but not the collision itself.

There is a lot of info that the judge has to go through before coming to that decision and I think you did well to get the other party to admit responsibility.
You would be unlikely to see a barrister presenting a case in the county court, especially on the small claims track, which is where most straightforward money claims are dealt with. On the small claims track, each side pays their own costs other than the court fees, which are initially paid by the claimant and then added onto the judgment debt if the defendant loses. This means that if either of the parties have legal representation at the hearing, the costs of this are their own problem and cannot usually be claimed against the losing party.

Looking at the dash cam footage of this incident, I'd say there was little the OP could have done to avoid the accident, other than by driving up the kerb on the left, which would have quite likely caused damage costing much more to rectify than just a mirror. You can see how much room the oncoming driver has to her left, and I'm sure any district judge looking at the footage would have realized that if the other driver had utilised this space rather than maintaining her course, then the damage would not have happened.



Most county court debt cases don't go as far as an actual hearing anyway. I'd say at least 80% of default summonses issued out of the county court are undefended. When a default summons is ignored, the claimant is entitled to apply for a default judgment 14 days after the presumed date of service, (28 days if the defendant files an acknowledgement of service).
With the exception of cases where there is death or personal injury involved, it is quite possible pursue a claim against a third party yourself, and simply notify your own insurer. Put "For information purposes only" at the top of the letter, so they can't say they weren't told about it. This also means they can't legitimately treat the matter as a claim against your policy.

Unless you are very busy, or very rich, it's almost never worth accepting the suggestion of a knock for knock agreement. All these agreements do is perpetuate the laziness of insurance claims departments, who don't want to do the job their policy holders have already paid them to do.
__________________
Recreate a visit to the homeopath by simply drinking some tap water and throwing £50 out of the window

Last edited by TheLeeds; Jan 30th, 2017 at 20:31.
TheLeeds is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheLeeds For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 30th, 2017, 21:06   #23
deepsix
Senior Member
 
deepsix's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 24th, 2024 08:42
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Romsey
Default

I was in County Court last week to claim uninsured losses against a transport company's insurance company. (incident 2015, wing mirror ripped off and paintwork around damaged; total cost to repair £1200)

The legal protection policy solicitors appointed (Winns) wouldn't take case on as said it would go 50/50, but I pushed via my own insurers. The defendant didn't show up. It was just me, my barrister and his barrister (representing his insurers). I won by default, though I'm sure my Barrister would have ripped his to shreds.

My insurance company; (Ageas, who were faultless throughout) got all their initial costs awarded (my car repairs court costs barrister etc) and I got all my out of pocket costs; excess, expenses etc.

It was a matter of principle and I dug my heels in. Hopefully white van man will think twice about rampaging around the countryside, fleeing the scene and thinking he'd get away with it. He did stop for a couple of seconds then fled at speed when I reversed up to him. I had to chase him into a cul de sac 2 miles away where he denied all responsibility. He only had one full arm which made me think he may not have been insured. Police were not interested obviously as it falls out with their criteria.

Who wins? I got my excess back and expenses, but not time lost. My insurers get all their costs back, but lose me as a client as even though they didn't reduce my no claims they increased the premium 43%
Result ?
__________________
1973 1800ES
2017 V90 CC D5 power pulse. Polestar and lots of toys.

I'm a Hornithologist, I love exotic birds.
deepsix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 30th, 2017, 23:56   #24
RoyMacDonald
VOC Member
 
RoyMacDonald's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 1st, 2023 11:27
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Rye, East Sussex
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deepsix View Post
I was in County Court last week to claim uninsured losses against a transport company's insurance company. (incident 2015, wing mirror ripped off and paintwork around damaged; total cost to repair £1200)

The legal protection policy solicitors appointed (Winns) wouldn't take case on as said it would go 50/50, but I pushed via my own insurers. The defendant didn't show up. It was just me, my barrister and his barrister (representing his insurers). I won by default, though I'm sure my Barrister would have ripped his to shreds.

My insurance company; (Ageas, who were faultless throughout) got all their initial costs awarded (my car repairs court costs barrister etc) and I got all my out of pocket costs; excess, expenses etc.

It was a matter of principle and I dug my heels in. Hopefully white van man will think twice about rampaging around the countryside, fleeing the scene and thinking he'd get away with it. He did stop for a couple of seconds then fled at speed when I reversed up to him. I had to chase him into a cul de sac 2 miles away where he denied all responsibility. He only had one full arm which made me think he may not have been insured. Police were not interested obviously as it falls out with their criteria.

Who wins? I got my excess back and expenses, but not time lost. My insurers get all their costs back, but lose me as a client as even though they didn't reduce my no claims they increased the premium 43%
Result ?
Wasn't this guy was it? Hit us in Broadoak and ran. Didn't know he had lost his number plate.

Roy

Roy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Lorry-no-Plate-Hit-&-Run.jpg (182.9 KB, 8 views)
__________________
1984 245 SE 1986 345 SE Auto
1991 940 TD Auto 2003 XC90 D5 SE AWD Geartronic2002 V70 D5 SE Auto 2014 V40 D2 SE Tiptronic Cross Country 2017 V40 D2 Cross Country Geartronic Pro 2015 XC60 D5 Polestar SE Lux Nav AWD Geartronic
RoyMacDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31st, 2017, 17:56   #25
deepsix
Senior Member
 
deepsix's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 24th, 2024 08:42
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Romsey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyMacDonald View Post
Wasn't this guy was it? Hit us in Broadoak and ran. Didn't know he had lost his number plate.

Roy

Roy
No his was a 15 reg Citroen Relay curtain side van marauding around with a one armed driver.
__________________
1973 1800ES
2017 V90 CC D5 power pulse. Polestar and lots of toys.

I'm a Hornithologist, I love exotic birds.
deepsix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to deepsix For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:21.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.