New D5 for XC60 ? - Page 2

RoyMacDonald · Apr 16th, 2009, 00:28

The FWD model is called the XC60 2.4D DRIVEe

There is also an XC70 2.4D DRIVEe but the info Volvo just sent me dosn't say whether it's FWD or AWD, although they do quote the same fuel consumption for both models.

Roy

XC60Owner · Apr 16th, 2009, 09:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewVolvo

New details as given in new XC60 brochure....

Old New
185 / 205 bhp
400 / 420 Nm Torque
2000-2750 / 1500-3250 rpm
9.4 / 8.4s 0-60 (auto)
124 / 127 mph topspeed
25.9 / 28.0 Mpg Urban
41.5 / 46.3 Mpg Extra Urban
34 / 37.7 Mpg Combined

Sounds all good to me. In-gear performance should be good as new engine now have a Bi-Turbo setup.

Big price increase though .... D5 AWD SE Lux increased from 29,050 OTR to 30,745 OTR that's a £1695 increase!

NewVolvo · Apr 16th, 2009, 12:58

Yes, first Volvo indicated a £750 increase and now, as you say, it became £1695.

BUT, according to Volvo, the residuals are supposed to be much better.

JackRussel · Apr 16th, 2009, 17:37

When I changed my order from a MY2009 to MY2010 my dealer told me there was a £750 price increase so that is the price I ordered my car at

XC60Monkey · May 14th, 2009, 16:19

I test drove the 185PS D5 last weekend in the XC60 and was pretty underwhelmed. Was thinking of ordering the 175PS D4 but it looks like I'm gonna go for the 205PS D5 now. Does anyone have any comments to sway me either way on my choice of new engine as the maximum torque ranges appear to have been extended down to 1500rpm. The new D5 does cost a lot more - I'm not a power freak - just need a decent response when I pull away from a junction.

NewVolvo · May 14th, 2009, 19:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by XC60Monkey

I test drove the 185PS D5 last weekend in the XC60 and was pretty underwhelmed. Was thinking of ordering the 175PS D4 but it looks like I'm gonna go for the 205PS D5 now. Does anyone have any comments to sway me either way on my choice of new engine as the maximum torque ranges appear to have been extended down to 1500rpm. The new D5 does cost a lot more - I'm not a power freak - just need a decent response when I pull away from a junction.

Well, I have had the "previous" 163 bhp 2.4D as a rental in Sweden several times and it is not slow at all. All cars have been auto by the way. Plenty of oomph. I would imagine that even the "old" D5 with 185 bhp should be fine too.

All about if you want the power or not. BUT, by not having it, I think you would always regret it.

XC60Owner · May 15th, 2009, 10:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewVolvo

Well, I have had the "previous" 163 bhp 2.4D as a rental in Sweden several times and it is not slow at all. All cars have been auto by the way. Plenty of oomph. I would imagine that even the "old" D5 with 185 bhp should be fine too.

All about if you want the power or not. BUT, by not having it, I think you would always regret it.

I agree. I am impressed by my D5 185bhp. Floor it and it really shifts. 0-60 is not fantastic but is certainly respectable.

XC60Monkey · May 15th, 2009, 14:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by XC60Owner

I agree. I am impressed by my D5 185bhp. Floor it and it really shifts. 0-60 is not fantastic but is certainly respectable.

Ok - I've decided on the D4 175PS - anyone have any views on lack of AWD - will I miss it for 100% onroad driving?

Nice But Dim · May 15th, 2009, 14:46

That's the one I've gone for too - my view was the reduction in weight and noise thro' not having the rwd drive train - increased economy and lower tax status - to me was the ideal....... and to be honest who actaully uses the 4wd in their commute - I would not....

Quote:

Originally Posted by XC60Monkey

Ok - I've decided on the D4 175PS - anyone have any views on lack of AWD - will I miss it for 100% onroad driving?

JackRussel · May 15th, 2009, 14:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by XC60Monkey

Ok - I've decided on the D4 175PS - anyone have any views on lack of AWD - will I miss it for 100% onroad driving?

It's hard to miss something if you've never had it. There may be the odd occasion when AWD will get you out of a sticky situation, snow being the most obvious example, but also any other situation when traction is at a premium e.g. cornering in the wet. Depends how hard you like to push your car but you will reach the limit of FWD traction before you reach the limit of AWD traction in certain situations.

My wife and daughter tow a horse box in out of muddy fields so for us, FWD was essential.

Apr 16th, 2009, 00:28	#11
RoyMacDonald VOC Member Last Online: Feb 1st, 2023 11:27 Join Date: May 2007 Location: Rye, East Sussex View Photos By: RoyMacDonald	The FWD model is called the XC60 2.4D DRIVEe There is also an XC70 2.4D DRIVEe but the info Volvo just sent me dosn't say whether it's FWD or AWD, although they do quote the same fuel consumption for both models. Roy __________________ 1984 245 SE 1986 345 SE Auto 1991 940 TD Auto 2003 XC90 D5 SE AWD Geartronic2002 V70 D5 SE Auto 2014 V40 D2 SE Tiptronic Cross Country 2017 V40 D2 Cross Country Geartronic Pro 2015 XC60 D5 Polestar SE Lux Nav AWD Geartronic

Apr 16th, 2009, 12:58	#13
NewVolvo VOC Member Last Online: Oct 23rd, 2022 19:52 Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Köln, Germany View Photos By: NewVolvo	Yes, first Volvo indicated a £750 increase and now, as you say, it became £1695. BUT, according to Volvo, the residuals are supposed to be much better. __________________ 2019 XC60 T6 R-Design 2017 S6 Avant 1996 850R 1987 780 Bertone Lots of previous Volvo's

Apr 16th, 2009, 17:37	#14
JackRussel Junior Member Last Online: Dec 8th, 2009 16:25 Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Edinburgh	When I changed my order from a MY2009 to MY2010 my dealer told me there was a £750 price increase so that is the price I ordered my car at __________________ MY2010 XC60 D5 (205PS) SE Premium

May 14th, 2009, 16:19	#15
XC60Monkey Junior Member Last Online: Nov 28th, 2013 12:02 Join Date: May 2009 Location: London	I test drove the 185PS D5 last weekend in the XC60 and was pretty underwhelmed. Was thinking of ordering the 175PS D4 but it looks like I'm gonna go for the 205PS D5 now. Does anyone have any comments to sway me either way on my choice of new engine as the maximum torque ranges appear to have been extended down to 1500rpm. The new D5 does cost a lot more - I'm not a power freak - just need a decent response when I pull away from a junction.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)