Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > 200 Series General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

200 Series General Forum for the Volvo 240 and 260 cars

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Bad, bad combination: Automatic and dieseling!

Views : 1596

Replies : 7

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Sep 18th, 2003, 11:03   #1
Erling
VOC member
 
Erling's Avatar
 

Last Online: May 8th, 2007 20:15
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Stavanger
Default Bad, bad combination: Automatic and dieseling!

My 1987 240 GL has the B230K motor, originally equipped with a Solex Cisac carburettor. I have now found a nearly new Weber 36/36DCD as a replacement. Fitting the carb should be pretty straightforward, all I need is to do is to enlarge the mounting holes a little and it will fit on the existing intake.

The one thing that worries me, is possible problems with dieseling – the B230K has a rather high compression. To prevent this, the Solex carb has an electric circuit that shuts off fuel feed when the engine is stopped, a feature the Weber is lacking. And, as my car has automatic transmission, I will not be able to stall the engine - it will keep on running until the tank is empty!

What can I do if this problem occurs? I am contemplating replacing the mechanical fuel pump with an electrical unit, but the engine would still keep on running until the float chamber is empty, which again would make the next start harder, wouldn't it?

Your thoughts/suggestions are very welcome!

Erling, Norway.
http://home.no.net/ebrox
Erling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18th, 2003, 13:26   #2
cbyard
TDC Member ;-)
 

Last Online: Jun 13th, 2020 19:08
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Witney
Default RE: Bad, bad combination: Automatic and dieseling!

The way to stop dieseling is to make the mixture so weak it won't burn. The obvious way to do this is to cut off the fuel, but you can also do it by letting in lots of air eg by opening a valve to atmosphere on the engine side of the carburetter.

I think the second method is more amenable to DIY ingenuity- maybe a normally open (close when the ignition is turned on) solenoid valve teed off the brake servo vacuum line?

Chris
cbyard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18th, 2003, 18:57   #3
Colin Shepherd
Guest
 

Location:
Default RE: Bad, bad combination: Automatic and dieseling!

http://pic7.picturetrail.com/VOL188/...8/23744414.jpg

Ref. the air valve Chris mentioned, Ford used just such a valve on quite a few of their (later) small OHV engines in Escorts etc.
It should be available from a Ford dealer or scrap yard.
Colin.
  Reply With Quote
Old Sep 19th, 2003, 07:43   #4
Erling
VOC member
 
Erling's Avatar
 

Last Online: May 8th, 2007 20:15
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Stavanger
Default RE: Bad, bad combination: Automatic and dieseling!

Thanks a bunch, both Chris and Colin. I think we're on to something! There are usually a number of early eighties, carburretted Sierras at my local yard - will they be candidates? Also, could I please ask you to be more specific? Are we talking about an electromagnetic valve (pulled from a Ford) spliced into the existing vacuum line between the intake and the brake servo? Or do I need to fit a new line (onto the vacuum line)? The valve should obviously be connected to a circuit that's turned on/off with the ignition.

A link to a picture or a simple sketch to help me understand the layout and what to look for at the yard would have been extremely handy...

Again thanks,
Erling
http://home.no.net/ebrox
Erling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 19th, 2003, 09:54   #5
Erling
VOC member
 
Erling's Avatar
 

Last Online: May 8th, 2007 20:15
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Stavanger
Default RE: Bad, bad combination: Automatic and dieseling!

To anybody who might also be taking the Weber route: There is a great page w/pics showing how these lines are run on a Weber-fitted MGB: http://www.mgbexperience.com/service/weber-hose.html

I also found that the full Haynes Scorpio-book was on the web, so now I've got a print-out of what this "anti-dieseling valve", "anti run-on valve" (those are good search terms) looks like.

Things are definitely looking up!

Erling.
http://home.no.net/ebrox
Erling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 20th, 2003, 01:46   #6
Peter Milnes
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Apr 10th, 2014 00:01
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tonyrefail
Default RE: Bad, bad combination: Automatic and dieseling!


If you are in the VOC then peruse the Technical Driver back issues on this website. There is an article in issue 110 pages 39, 40, 41, 42, inside back cover and back cover, by our esteemed member Kay Campbell on Weber Carb Conversion and V8 power - 700 series. Kay is an extremely able lady with cars (ex R.E.M.E.) and has a better Weber conversion than the stock one. Do try to read the article, I think you will not need an anti-run-on valve. Incidentally most of us old'uns will recognise the symptoms you describe as being what happens when an engine gets coked up (over-rich running). There are a lot of cures for this with quite good results.

All the best, Peter
Peter Milnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 20th, 2003, 20:42   #7
Erling
VOC member
 
Erling's Avatar
 

Last Online: May 8th, 2007 20:15
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Stavanger
Default RE: Bad, bad combination: Automatic and dieseling!

Sorry no, I am not a member – I’m in Norway. I tried to access the archives, but it has been password protected since my last visit. I guess I will try to offer to pay the club for a scan or a photocopy.

As for the valve, I actually found one this morning – from a 1985 Ford Courier. At least, I hope it’s the right valve, but with the parts number on it I hope to be able to check it with the local Ford dealer.

I was a bit muddy in my first post; I have not done the conversion yet. It’s still on the drawing board, the Weber and my car is at present 400 miles apart. The car is not dieseling at all with the Solex, my fears are that it may occur once I install a carb without any anti-dieseling device. Two reasons for my fears: Firstly, because of the B230K’s 10.5:1 compression. But also because of the previous owner’s, my father’s, very careful driving. I suspect that 15 years of rarely exceeding 3000 RPM may not have done the chambrs any good. Hopefully my bit of fun on the Autobahn this summer has cleaned things up a bit! Our equivalent of the AA actually advised me not to use any cleaning additives when I asked them. They said that in worst case soot could come loose in chunks around the valve seats. It made sense to me, so I refrained from this. I will be very interested in a second opinion: Any good brand names or experiences?

Also, do you think I will be happy with the Weber 36/36?

Thanks,
Erling.
http://home.no.net/ebrox/
Erling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 21st, 2003, 00:51   #8
Peter Milnes
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Apr 10th, 2014 00:01
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tonyrefail
Default RE: Bad, bad combination: Automatic and dieseling!


Kay reccommends the 32DGAV carburettor from a Capri, Cortina Mks 3,4, or 5, 2 Litre Pinto engined Sierra, or Mk 2 Granada, complete with manifold, linkage and hoses, to make sure that you do not have to go haring down to the scrapyard again when halfway through the fitting. She gets 75 mph in 300 metres and a top whack in excess of 120 mph. As a bonus she gets 33 mpg at 70 mph.

Perhaps our Bob might be able to download a copy of the article as an attachment for you, but do ask him nicely as befits his good nature.

All the best, Peter
Peter Milnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:24.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.