|
700/900 Series General Forum for the Volvo 740, 760, 780, 940, 960 & S/V90 cars |
Information |
|
960 2.5 m90Views : 1312 Replies : 23Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Sep 13th, 2018, 11:40 | #21 |
Member at Large
Last Online: Sep 8th, 2019 12:46
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Southampton
|
Can i just ask which lightened flywheel you used?
And how heavy the stock one is. I have a 2.5 manual and i'm thinking of either a screamer NA 7500 rmp wagon or a t6 swapped boosty-beasty. If the former lighter flywheel is a must. Oh, and did you notice on the 2.5 the flywheel seems well judged for rev-matching? I find as a i shift gear the revs have fallen almost exactly to the next ratio when i bring the clutch up. Didn't notice it in my 940 on the stock DMF. PP |
The Following User Says Thank You to ThePurplePanther For This Useful Post: |
Sep 14th, 2018, 11:31 | #22 |
Senior Member
Last Online: Yesterday 18:40
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Glasgow
|
I only drove the 2.5 car about 40 miles, rough idle, didn't reach temperature and was totally gutless, so no real experience of a good one, went with a Classicswede 5kg (I think) flywheel, about 3kg less than standard, wanted to loose the dmf whilst doing the conversion so figured it made sense to upgrade at the same time
|
The Following User Says Thank You to monty400k For This Useful Post: |
Oct 3rd, 2018, 13:07 | #23 | |
Senior Member
Last Online: Yesterday 18:40
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Glasgow
|
Quote:
|
|
Oct 3rd, 2018, 13:17 | #24 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Yesterday 21:57
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lakenheath
|
Probably slightly slower on acceleration but better on economy and cruising. Think i have the 3.54:1 axle in mine but certainly wouldn't complain if it was a 3.31:1 - better economy!
__________________
Cheers Dave Next Door to Top-Gun with a Honda CR-V & S Type Jag Volvo gone but not forgotten........ |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|